中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 952-955.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.06.032

• 医学教育评估 • 上一篇    下一篇

头戴式记录仪在临床操作技能评价中的信度研究

刘嘉祯, 陆耀红, 邹扬, 王洪, 王道珍, 李萍   

  1. 200233 上海市第六人民医院教学办公室
  • 出版日期:2017-06-01 发布日期:2020-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 李萍, Email:lipingxu365@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中华医学会医学教育分会和中国高等教育学会医学教育专业委员会2016年医学教育研究课题(2016B-PG021)

Reliability research on the wearable recording equipment applied in the clinical skill evaluation

Liu Jiazhen, Lu Yaohong, Zou Yang, Wang Hong, Wang Daozhen, Li ping   

  1. Teaching Department, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China
  • Online:2017-06-01 Published:2020-12-09
  • Contact: Li Ping, Email:lipingxu365@163.com

摘要: 目的 研究头戴式记录仪在医学操作技能评价中的信度。方法 运用头戴式记录仪对39名学生的外科操作技能考核过程进行录像,3名考官进行现场评分及录像评分,通过比较现场评分及录像评分,得出头戴式记录仪考核的复本信度、评分者信度和重测信度。 结果 头戴式记录仪考核的复本信度、评分者信度和重测信度较高。结论 头戴式记录仪运用在临床操作技能评价中的信度较高,能够在不影响考生的情况下,捕捉到考生在技能操作中的细节,是一种可以实现异时异地评分的远程医学考试设备。

关键词: 头戴式记录仪, 信度研究, 临床医学, 操作技能

Abstract: Objective To study the reliability of wearable recording equipment used in the medical operation skills evaluation.Methods The wearable recording equipment were used to record 39 students' medical operation skill performance in a test, 3 examiners give score through watching the video. 1 of the 3 examiners does the on-site evaluation as well. Through the comparison of on-site score and video score, to test copy reliability, rater reliability and test-retest reliability of the wearable recording equipment.Results The copy reliability (0.486), rater reliability (0.934 and 0.611) and test-retest reliability (0.918 and 0.903) are high.Conclusions Without the influence on the students, the equipment can capture more details of their performance. With the help of the record, the examiners can evaluate the students in a different time and difference place.

Key words: Wearable recording equipment, Reliability research, Clinical medicine, Skill evaluation