Chinese Journal of Medical Education ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 315-320.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240219-00151

• Foreign and Comparative Medical Education • Previous Articles    

A comparison of national nurse licensure examination in five countries and implications for China

Pan Shucheng1, Shang Shaomei1, Zhou Weijiao1, Liu Hanyu2, Feng Shicong3, Jiang Zhehan4   

  1. 1 Department of Geriatric Nursing Rehabilitation, School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China;
    2 Master Degree Candidate, Medical Education, Enrolled in 2022, School of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
    3 Master Degree Candidate, Medical Education, Enrolled in 2023, School of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
    4 Institute of Medical Education, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2024-02-19 Online:2025-04-01 Published:2025-03-31
  • Contact: Jiang Zhehan, Email: jiangzhehan@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72104006); Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72474004); Peking University Health Science Center Education and Teaching Research Project (2024YB40); Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (GZC20240067); Scientific Research Project of the National Traditional

Abstract: National Nursing Licensure Examination (NNLE) is recognized as an entry-level examination for nursing occupation, securing the entry quality of the nursing workforce. This paper reviews current situation of NNLE systems in five countries, China, the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and South Korea, including their similarities and differences in the examination administration, legal frameworks, entry qualifications, specific examination formats (including types of questions, quantity, and duration), examination content, and pass rates. Furthermore, it proposes implications for future development of China's NNLE: firstly, to enhance legislative support for nurses; secondly, to foster the professional development of examination management organizations; thirdly, to optimize the educational requirements for nursing; fourthly, to employ sophisticated and simulation-based measurement techniques to facilitate multi-dimensional and dynamic examination assessments; and fifthly, to advocate for the establishment of a scientific and standardized examination system.

Key words: Nurses, Practice qualification examination, Entry-level system, Comparison, Implication

CLC Number: