高仿真模拟教学在护理本科教育中应用效果的meta分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220613-00776

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 58-62.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220613-00776

高仿真模拟教学在护理本科教育中应用效果的meta分析

王艳杰¹, 李婉晴², 李魏¹, 刘艳霞¹, 马景双¹, 毛智慧¹, 蒋丹¹, 张丽娟¹

¹辽宁中医药大学护理学院护理实训教研室,沈阳 110032;
²辽宁中医药大学2020级护理学专业硕士研究生,沈阳 110032

收稿日期:2022-06-13 出版日期:2023-01-01 发布日期:2022-12-29
通讯作者: 王艳杰, Email: wangyanjie0103@163.com
基金资助:
辽宁中医药大学2020年度教学改革研究项目(LNZYJG2020010);辽宁省教育厅2019年度科学研究项目(L201936);辽宁中医药大学2021年“课程思政”专项教学改革研究项目(LNZYJGSZ2021048)

Effect of high-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education: a meta-analysis

Wang Yanjie¹, Li Wanqing², Li Wei¹, Liu Yanxia¹, Ma Jingshuang¹, Mao Zhihui¹, Jiang Dan¹, Zhang Lijuan¹

¹Division of Nursing Practical Training, School of Nursing, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang 110032, China;
²Master Degree Candidate, Nursing Major, Enrolled in 2020, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang 110032, China

Received:2022-06-13 Online:2023-01-01 Published:2022-12-29
Contact: Wang Yanjie, Email: wangyanjie0103@163.com
Supported by:
2020 Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Teaching Reform Project (LNZYJG2020010); 2019 Scientific Research Project of Education Department of Liaoning Province(L201936); 2021 Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Ideological and Political Teaching Reform Special Project (LNZYJGSZ2021048)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨高仿真模拟(high-fidelity simulation,HFS)教学在护理学专业本科教育中的应用效果。方法于2022年2月12日,检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、万方、中国知网、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库中关于HFS教学与传统教学比较的随机对照试验和类实验性研究。按照纳入与排除标准筛选文献,采用RevMan 5.3对文献进行Meta分析。结果共纳入34篇文献,其中英文16篇,中文18篇,总样本量为3 318名护理学专业本科生。文献质量评价结果为A级1篇,其余均为B级。Meta分析结果显示,HFS教学有助于学生掌握知识[标准化均数差(standardized mean differences,SMD)＝0.80,95％CI=0.59～1.02,P＜0.001]、提升技能(SMD＝0.86,95％CI=0.65～1.08,P＜0.001)和临床综合能力(SMD＝0.39,95％CI=0.14～0.64,P=0.002)。结论 HFS教学对护理学专业本科生在掌握知识、提高技能和临床综合能力方面有效。

关键词: 护理, 高仿真模拟教学, 本科教育, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) in undergraduate nursing education. Methods On February 12, 2022, randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies on the comparison between HFS and traditional teaching were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, VIP and China Biology Medicine(CBM) database. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3. Results A total of 34 literatures were included, including 16 English literatures and 18 Chinese literatures. The total sample size was 3 318 undergraduate nursing students. The quality evaluation result of the literatures included 1 paper with grade A, and the rest were all grade B. Meta-analysis showed that HFS could help students to master knowledge [standardized mean differences(SMD)=0.80, 95%CI=0.59～1.02, P＜0.001],improve skills(SMD=0.86, 95%CI=0.65～1.08, P＜0.001) and clinical comprehensive competence(SMD=0.39, 95%CI=0.14～0.64, P=0.002). Conclusions HFS is effective in mastering the knowledge, improving skills and clinical comprehensive competence of undergraduate nursing students.

Key words: Nursing, High-fidelity simulation, Undergraduate education, Meta-analysis

中图分类号:

R-04

王艳杰, 李婉晴, 李魏, 刘艳霞, 马景双, 毛智慧, 蒋丹, 张丽娟. 高仿真模拟教学在护理本科教育中应用效果的meta分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(1): 58-62.

Wang Yanjie, Li Wanqing, Li Wei, Liu Yanxia, Ma Jingshuang, Mao Zhihui, Jiang Dan, Zhang Lijuan. Effect of high-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education: a meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2023, 43(1): 58-62.

参考文献

[1] Labrague LJ, McEnroe-Petitte DM, Bowling AM, et al. High-fidelity simulation and nursing students' anxiety and self-confidence: a systematic review[J]. Nurs Forum, 2019,54(3): 358-368. DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12337.
[2] 成磊, 冯升, 徐燕, 等. 高仿真模拟人在护理教学中应用效果的系统评价[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2013, 30(17): 6-11.
[3] Warren JN, Luctkar-Flude M, Godfrey C, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation-based education on satisfaction and learning outcomes in nurse practitioner programs[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2016, 46: 99-108.
[4] Ahn H, Kim HY. Implementation and outcome evaluation of high-fidelity simulation scenarios to integrate cognitive and psychomotor skills for Korean nursing students[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2015, 35(5): 706-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.021.
[5] Stroup, Carrie. Simulation usage in nursing fundamentals: integrative literature review[J]. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 2014, 10(3): e155-e164. DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.10.004.
[6] 胡雁,郝玉芳. 循证护理学 [M]. 第2版,北京:人民卫生出版社, 2018:56-57.
[7] Aqel AA, Ahmad MM. High-fidelity simulation effects on CPR knowledge, skills, acquisition, and retention in nursing students[J]. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, 2014, 11(6): 394-400. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12063.
[8] Akalin A, Sahin S. The impact of high-fidelity simulation on knowledge, critical thinking, and clinical decision-making for the management of pre-eclampsia[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2020, 150(3): 354-360. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13243.
[9] Blakeslee JR. Effects of high-fidelity simulation on the critical thinking skills of baccalaureate nursing students: A causal-comparative research study[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2020, 92: 104494. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104494.
[10] Blum CA, Borglund S, Parcells D. High-fidelity nursing simulation: impact on student self-confidence and clinical competence[J]. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh, 2010, 7: Article 18. DOI: 10.2202/1548-923X.2035.
[11] Brannan JD, White A, Bezanson JL. Simulator effects on cognitive skills and confidence levels[J]. J Nurs Educ, 2008, 47(11): 495-500. DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20081101-01.
[12] ildan Çalιm S, Cambaz Ulaş S, Demirci H, et al. Effect of simulation training on students' childbirth skills and satisfaction in Turkey[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2020, 46: 102808. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102808.
[13] Jang A, Song M, Kim S. Development and effects of leukemia nursing simulation based on clinical reasoning[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(8): 4190. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18084190.
[14] Lee J, Lee Y, Lee S, et al. Effects of high-fidelity patient simulation led clinical reasoning course: focused on nursing core competencies, problem solving, and academic self-efficacy[J]. Jpn J Nurs Sci, 2016, 13(1): 20-28. DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12080.
[15] Merriman CD, Stayt LC, Ricketts B. Comparing the effectiveness of clinical simulation versus didactic mMethods to teach undergraduate adult nursing students to recognize and assess the deteriorating patient[J]. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 2014, 10(3): e119-e27. DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.09.004.
[16] Rodgers DL, Securro S Jr, Pauley RD. The effect of high-fidelity simulation on educational outcomes in an advanced cardiovascular life support course[J]. Simul Healthc, 2009, 4(4): 200-206. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181b1b877.
[17] Terzi B, Topbaş E, Bingöl G, et al. Comparison of the effects of two different teaching methods in blood pressure measurement training: a randomized controlled study[J]. Blood Press Monit, 2019, 24(6): 294-298. DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000401.
[18] Tosterud R, Hedelin B, Hall-Lord ML. Nursing students' perceptions of high- and low-fidelity simulation used as learning methods[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2013, 13(4): 262-270.
[19] Ling FK, Abdullah K, Gan SC, et al. The impact of high fidelity patient simulation on the level of knowledge and critical thinking skills in code blue management among undergraduate nursing students in Malaysia[J]. SAGE Open, 2021, 11(2):1-10. DOI:10.1177/21582440211007123.
[20] Mutlu B, Yιlmaz OE, Dur S. The effect of high- and low-fidelity simulators in learning heart and lung sounds by undergraduate nurses: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Contemp Nurse, 2019, 55(4-5): 351-359. DOI: 10.1080/10376178.2019.1662321.
[21] Fawaz MA, Hamdan-Mansour AM. Impact of high-fidelity simulation on the development of clinical judgment and motivation among Lebanese nursing students[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2016, 46: 36-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.026.
[22] 王宁, 徐江华. 高仿真模拟教学在健康评估实践教学中的应用[J]. 全科护理, 2020, 18(4): 504-509. DOI: 10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2020.04.032.
[23] 方敏, 杨宝义, 汪蓉,等. 虚拟现实技术在急危重症护理学实验教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2015, 12(11): 820-822. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2015.11.005.
[24] 刘航, 黄莉, 谭颖, 等. 高仿真模拟综合实验教学在基础护理技能强化训练中的应用[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2017, 36(11): 1575-1577. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4351.2017.11.047.
[25] 潘玲玲, 赵爱平, 袁莉萍, 等. 高级模拟人在护生临床实习期间危重症护理教学中的应用探讨[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2016, 31(11): 1024-1027. DOI: 10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2016.11.026.
[26] 孙志岭, 徐桂华, 王丹文. 高仿真情景模拟教学在健康评估教学中的应用[J]. 重庆医学, 2012, 41(11): 1136-1138.
[27] 田红梅, 杨丽娜, 何剑. 以组为单位仿真模拟教学法在护生强化训练中的实践[J]. 中国病案, 2015(5): 80-82.
[28] 吴菁, 沈洁, 崔静, 等. 高仿真模拟人技能训练系统在护理学基础教学中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2013, 28(15): 77-78. DOI: 10.3870/hlxzz.2013.15.077.
[29] 赵文婷, 郭小燕, 张静,等. Sim-Man仿真模拟教学法在《基础护理学》实验教学中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2018, 24(16): 73-75. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2018.16.030.
[30] 黄四碧, 刘丽华, 杨涛, 等. 高级智能综合模拟人ECS在急诊护理学实训教学中的应用[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2013, (24): 3263-3264,3267. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2013.24.007.
[31] 姜文莉, 高歌心, 符丽燕. 综合模拟人在急救护理学教学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2008, 5(4): 170-172. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2008.04.012.
[32] 李文艳, 任刚, 胡春媚. 高级智能综合模拟人在护理生心肺复苏实训中的应用[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2014, (4): 555-556. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2014.04.056.
[33] 柳家贤, 谈益芬. SimMan综合模拟系统在急救护理学实验教学中的应用[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2014, 32(24): 72-73.
[34] 高燕, 赵立民. 高端模拟系统在护理本科生急救技能培训中的应用[J]. 护理研究, 2008, 22(1): 79-80. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2008.01.037.
[35] 刘艳平. 仿真人模拟教学在急救护理技能教学中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2009, 24(1): 29-30. DOI: 10.3870/hlxzz.2009.01.029.
[36] 魏宁, 张慧敏, 邱文波, 等. 高仿真模拟教学在传染病护理学实验课中的应用[J]. 全科护理, 2018, 16(4): 388-391. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4748.2018.04.002.
[37] 吴向莉. Simman 3G超级综合全功能模拟人在《急危重症护理学》实验教学中的应用[J]. 九江学院学报(自然科学版), 2017, 32(4): 27-28,32.
[38] 牛桂芳, 孙建萍, 武晓红, 等. 高仿真模拟教学对护理本科生临床能力影响的研究[J]. 中华护理教育, 2014, 11(5): 351-353. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2014.05.008.
[39] 邱寅龙. 基于SimMan 3G高端模拟人情景模拟教学法在ICU护生临床思维教学中的应用效果[J]. 全科护理, 2021, 19(17): 2446-2448. DOI: 10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2021.17.039.
[40] 达珍, 普珍, 孙宏玉. 护理学本科毕业生胜任力现状调查与分析——基于混合研究视角[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(3): 422-427. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.03.019.
[41] Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care[J]. Qual Saf Health Care, 2004, 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): i2-10.
[42] Carvalho D, Azevedo IC, Cruz G, et al. Strategies used for the promotion of critical thinking in nursing undergraduate education: a systematic review[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2017, 57: 103-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.07.010.
[43] Yuan HB, Williams BA, Fang JB. The contribution of high-fidelity simulation to nursing students' confidence and competence: a systematic review [J]. Int Nurs Rev, 2012: 26-33. DOI:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00964.x.

高仿真模拟教学在护理本科教育中应用效果的meta分析

Effect of high-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education: a meta-analysis

PDF (Mobile)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	肖光红, 路娜, 庄思敏, 侯佳文, 赵亚楠, 马喜梅, 王艳红. 培训需求分析在护理人员专业培训中应用的综述[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(1): 53-57.
[2]	单亚维, 周雪美, 孙连荣, 祁雯雯, 刘晓. 情动理论视域下精神科护理学课程线上教学中学生同理心培养研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(9): 827-831.
[3]	黄雪燕, 陈坚翱, 陆露梦, 董玉红. 创新团队培训在护理创新人才培养中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(9): 832-835.
[4]	阮小丽, 蚁淳, 谢琼, 程梦慧, 李舒平. 基于人性照护理论的共情能力培训在护理专业基础护理学课程中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(9): 836-840.
[5]	何之璨, 车文静, 吴向未, 陈洁婷. 新疆某高校医学本科生教育环境感知类型与胜任力成长的关系研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(8): 687-691.
[6]	肖非, 刘曦, 陈惠丽, 吴庆, 洪仲思. 本科传染病学课程思政教学的探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(8): 713-716.
[7]	曾麒丹, 丁雪梅, 张薇薇, 张晓丽. 临床医学、预防医学与护理学专业课程思政教学实践方案的系统评价[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(7): 623-627.
[8]	景雪冰, 王硕, 韩庆坤, 房晓杰, 魏玉莲, 乔娟, 崔菡斐. 多学科协作模式在临床护理实践教学中的应用与展望[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(7): 651-655.
[9]	王丹, 于晨, 谢阿娜. 医学院校本科临床医学专业招生规模变化研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(5): 385-389.
[10]	高未印, 靳帅, 符鑫, 路潜. 护理领域置信职业行为研究的英文文献计量学分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(5): 413-416.
[11]	陈秋红, 王艳茹, 李晓静. 护理学专业本科生实习前后职业期望与职业成熟度的对比研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(3): 228-231.
[12]	姚秀钰, 沈伊如, 余灵灵, 王萧冉, 康子华. 护理学专业实习学生完成能力现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(2): 163-167.
[13]	王艳波, 崇月. 护理硕士专业学位研究生心理护理临床实践课程建设探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(12): 1128-1132.
[14]	卢秀丽, 梁文丽, 黄凤莲. 我国护理硕士专业学位研究生教育研究热点的可视化分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(12): 1133-1137.
[15]	姚赟, 陈兰, 冯科曙, 蒋玉芬, 吴智水. 基于情景教学法的患者安全感知能力培训项目的构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(11): 1000-1002.