中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 395-400.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250630-00725

• 国外医学与比较医学教育 • 上一篇    

健康中国视域下中美护理学专业认证比较研究

陈晓洵1, 杨棉华2, 谢阿娜3, 侯建林3, 苏静4   

  1. 1汕头大学医学院2024级护理硕士专业学位研究生,汕头 515041;
    2汕头大学医学院医学教育评价与研究中心,汕头 515041;
    3北京大学医学教育研究所,北京 100191;
    4汕头大学医学院护理学系,汕头 515041
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-30 出版日期:2026-05-01 发布日期:2026-04-30
  • 通讯作者: 苏静,Email:jsu@stu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国高等教育学会2024年度高等教育科学研究规划课题(24YJ0201);广东省本科高校教学质量与教学改革工程建设项目(粤教高函〔2023〕4号-589)

A comparative study of nursing accreditation between China and the United States in the context of the Healthy China Initiative

Chen Xiaoxun1, Yang Mianhua2, Xie Ana3, Hou Jianlin3, Su Jing4   

  1. 1Master of Nursing, Enrolled in 2024, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China;
    2Center of Medical Education Assessment and Research, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515014, China;
    3Institute of Medical Education, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China;
    4Department of Nursing, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
  • Received:2025-06-30 Online:2026-05-01 Published:2026-04-30
  • Contact: Su Jing,Email:jsu@stu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    The 2024 Higher Education Scientific Research Planning Project of China Association of Higher Education (24YJ0201); Guangdong Undergraduate Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Engineering Construction Project (Yue Jiao Gao Han [2023] 4-589)

摘要: 本研究通过分析中美护理学专业认证体系的异同,对进一步完善我国护理学教育和专业认证体系提出建议。美国采用高等护理教育委员会和护理教育认证委员会并行的认证模式,强调动态调整及与行业衔接,覆盖了多层次护理教育;我国则以护理学本科专业认证体系为主,注重规范统一,但在覆盖范围、国际兼容性等方面有待提升。本研究提出,我国可以借鉴国际经验,优化专业认证分层标准,建立动态机制;促进护理临床实践能力的阶段性培养和跨学科学习;将专业认证结果与教育政策联动,推动学生培养与医疗需求对接,为“健康中国2030”培养高质量护理人才提供保障。

关键词: 护理学, 护理教育研究, 专业认证, 中美比较, 分层认证

Abstract: A comparative analysis of nursing education accreditation systems was conducted between China and the United States, and recommendations are proposed for enhancing China′s nursing education and accreditation framework. The US employs a parallel accreditation model through Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education and Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing, which comprehensively covers multi-level nursing programs and emphasizes dynamic standard adjustment and industry alignment. In contrast, China primarily focuses on undergraduate nursing accreditation and prioritizes standardization, while demonstrating limitations in scope and international compatibility. This study proposes that China can draw on international experiences to refine tiered accreditation standards and establish a dynamic mechanism for nursing education. Additionally, the need for progressive training in clinical competencies and the promotion of interdisciplinary learning is emphasized. By linking accreditation outcomes with educational policies, this approach aims to align nursing education with healthcare demands, thereby contributing to the cultivation of high-quality nursing talent for the Healthy China 2030 initiative.

Key words: Nursing, Nursing education research, Professional accreditation, China-US comparison, Tiered accreditation

中图分类号: