中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 713-716.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20191022-00876

• 研究生教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

“双一流”高校医学研究生导师评价指标体系初探

吴恒璟1, 李金慧2, 吴静3, 钱曙蕾4, 赵艾霞2, 陈琳1   

  1. 1同济大学医学院院办公室,上海 200092;
    2同济大学医学与生命科学部办公室,上海 200092;
    3上海中医药大学护理学院基础护理教研室 201203;
    4同济大学医学院研究生办公室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-22 出版日期:2020-09-01 发布日期:2020-12-08
  • 通讯作者: 陈琳,Email:08165@tongji.edu.cn,电话:021-65981591
  • 基金资助:
    2018年中国学位与研究生教育学会学位与研究生教育研究课题(B1-YX20180501-03);同济大学研究生教育研究与改革项目(2019PT04、2019GL09)

Study on the evaluation index system of medical postgraduate tutor in double first-class universities

Wu Hengjing1, Li Jinhui2, Wu Jing3, Qian Shulei4, Zhao Aixia2, Chen Lin1   

  1. 1Administrative Office, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
    2Administrative Office, Department of Medicine and Life Science, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
    3Fundamental Nursing Office, School of Nursing, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China;
    4GraduateAffairs Office, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2019-10-22 Online:2020-09-01 Published:2020-12-08
  • Contact: Chen Lin, Email: 08165@tongji.edu.cn, Tel: 0086-21-65981591
  • Supported by:
    Academic Degrees and Graduate Education Research Project of Chinese Society of Academic Degrees and Graduate Education in 2018(B1-YX20180501-03); Tongji University Graduate Education Research and Reform Project(2019PT04, 2019GL09)

PDF (PC)

47

摘要： 目的 构建“双一流”高校医学研究生导师评价指标体系。方法 在调研、文献研究和政策分析的基础,采用问卷调查方法,通过2轮专家咨询问卷调查,采用描述性分析、非参数检验、权值因子判断表等方法进行数据分析。结果 2轮问卷总体权威系数为0.84;指标的Kendall's W协调系数为0.122,P=0.001,专家集中程度和协调性高度一致。初步建立了“双一流”高校医学研究生导师评价指标体系,指标体系由3个一级指标、9个二级指标、31个三级指标构成。结论 构建的“双一流”高校医学研究生导师评价指标体系比较合理,为评价医学研究生导师培养研究生的过程质量提供依据。

关键词: “双一流”, 医学研究生导师, 评价指标

Abstract: Objective To explore the evaluation index system of medical postgraduate tutor in double first-class universities.Methods The study preparation was based on preliminary survey, literature research and policies analysis. The study data was collected by two rounds of expert consultation and analyzed by using descriptive analysis, non-parametric test, and weight factor judgment table.Results The overall authority coefficient was 0.84.The Kendall's W coordination coefficient was 0.122, P=0.001, for indicating a high degree of expert concentration and coordination.Conclusions The Evaluation Index System of Medical Postgraduate Tutor in Double First-class Universities has been established, which consists of 3 first-level indexes, 9 second-level indexes and 31 third-level indexes. The study provides a reasonable and effective evaluation system for the process of training postgraduate students by medical tutors.

Key words: Double first-class, Postgraduate tutor, Evaluation index system

中图分类号: