综合性医院全科医学临床带教师资综合评价指标体系初步构建

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240718-00755

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 707-714.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240718-00755

综合性医院全科医学临床带教师资综合评价指标体系初步构建

郝立晓¹, 李静¹, 陈超², 陈丽芬², 王亚军², 岳敏¹, 贾建国¹

¹首都医科大学宣武医院全科医学科,北京 100053;
²首都医科大学宣武医院教育处,北京 100053

收稿日期:2024-07-18 出版日期:2025-09-01 发布日期:2025-09-02
通讯作者: 郝立晓, Email: haolixiao@xwhosp.org
基金资助:
中华医学会医学教育分会毕业后医学教育学组/继续医学教育学组2021年度教育管理课题(21QT001)

Preliminary construction of a comprehensive evaluation index system for general practice clinical teaching instructors in general hospitals

Hao Lixiao¹, Li Jing¹, Chen Chao², Chen Lifen², Wang Yajun², Yue Min¹, Jia Jianguo¹

¹Department of General Practice, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China;
²Education Department, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China

Received:2024-07-18 Online:2025-09-01 Published:2025-09-02
Contact: Hao Lixiao, Email: haolixiao@xwhosp.org
Supported by:
The Educational Management Project of the Post-Graduation Medical Education Group/Continuing Medical Education Group of the Medical Education Branch of the Chinese Medical Association in 2021(21QT001)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的初步构建综合性医院全科医学临床带教师资综合评价指标体系。方法 2023年8至9月,通过文献研究初步确定综合性医院全科医学临床带教师资综合评价指标体系,采用德尔菲专家咨询法对30名专家进行函询,采用归一化法确定指标权重。结果 2轮专家函询的有效问卷回收率均为100.0%,专家积极性较高;2轮函询的个人权威系数均为0.7~0.9,群体权威系数平均值均为0.81,均≥0.7;2轮函询的Kendall^,s W值分别为0.495和0.482(均P＜0.001)。共纳入职业素养、临床专业能力、教学能力和科研能力4个一级指标、18个二级指标和57个三级指标。结论本研究初步构建了我国全科医学临床带教师资综合评价指标体系,具有一定的科学性和可靠性,可以为综合性医院全科医学临床带教师资评价提供一定的参考。

关键词: 家庭医学, 临床带教师资, 综合性医院, 评价指标体系

Abstract: Objective To preliminary construct a comprehensive evaluation index system for general practitioners in clinical teaching in general hospitals. Methods From August to September 2023, a comprehensive evaluation index system for general practitioners in clinical teaching in general hospitals was initially determined through literature research. A Delphi expert consultation method was used to conduct a questionnaire survey among 30 experts, and the normalization method was used to determine the index weights. Results The effective questionnaire recovery rate of both rounds of expert consultation was 100.0%, and the experts were highly motivated. The individual authority coefficients of the 30 experts in both rounds were 0.7-0.9, and the average group authority coefficients both were 0.81, all ≥ 0.7. The Kendall's W values of the two rounds were 0.495 and 0.482 (all P<0.001), respectively. A total of 4 first-level indicators, including professional quality, clinical professional ability, teaching ability and research ability, 18 second-level indicators, and 57 third-level indicators were included. Conclusions This study initially established a comprehensive evaluation index system for general practitioners in clinical teaching in general hospitals in China, which is scientifically and reliably designed and can provide a certain reference for the evaluation of general practitioners in clinical teaching in general hospitals.

Key words: Family medicine, Clinical teacher, General hospital, Evaluation index system

中图分类号:

郝立晓, 李静, 陈超, 陈丽芬, 王亚军, 岳敏, 贾建国. 综合性医院全科医学临床带教师资综合评价指标体系初步构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(9): 707-714.

Hao Lixiao, Li Jing, Chen Chao, Chen Lifen, Wang Yajun, Yue Min, Jia Jianguo. Preliminary construction of a comprehensive evaluation index system for general practice clinical teaching instructors in general hospitals[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2025, 45(9): 707-714.

参考文献

[1] 武艳菊. 河北省住院医师规范化培训临床基地全科师资现状调查研究[D]. 石家庄:河北医科大学, 2023.
[2] Sherbino J, Frank JR, Snell L. Defining the key roles and competencies of the clinician-educator of the 21st century: a national mixed-methods study[J]. Acad Med, 2014,89(5):783-789. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000217.
[3] The Royal Australian college of general practitioners.Standards for general practice education and training requirement for fellowship 2005[EB/OL].[2025-08-05].http://www.racgp.org.au/Content//NavigationMenu/educationandtraining/Fellowship/Requirementsforellowship/2005felllowship.pdf,2005.
[4] Walsh A, Antao V, Bethune C, et al. Fundamental teaching activities in family medicine: a framework for faculty development[M]. Mississauga:College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC),2015:2-18.
[5] 胡传来. 紧抓全科医学学科建设推动全科医学人才战略[J]. 实用全科医学, 2008,6(3): 221-223.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4152.2008.
[6] 卢祖洵. 我国全科医学师资队伍现状分析与建设构想[J].全科医学临床与教育,2011,9(2):121-122.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3686.2011.02.001.
[7] 梁丽喆, 陶弘武, 陆飞, 等. 中医住院医师规范化培训过程考核的实践与探索[J]. 中国毕业后医学教育, 2020,4(1): 93-96.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2020.01.024.
[8] 刘振华, 雷升云, 王欲晓, 等. 专科师资进行全科师资规范化培训的局限性探讨与建议[J]. 中国毕业后医学教育, 2019,3(2): 145-147.
[9] 李庆林, 张进, 张淑娥, 等. 临床教师胜任力研究现状分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021,41(4): 314-317. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200629-00980.
[10] 徐友凤, 陈立新, 张珍珍, 等. 基于胜任力理论的医药卫生高职“双师型”教师队伍建设探讨[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2020,38(17): 16-18.
[11] 王一杰. 综合医院全科医学师资胜任力评价指标体系构建研究[D]. 滨州:滨州医学院, 2021.
[12] 赵轶明, 王永晨. 全科医学临床师资综合指标体系的初步构建[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2020,19(9): 1102-1107. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20191208-00254.
[13] 陆媛, 王朝昕, 王明虹, 等. 基于层次分析法全科临床师资标准的构建研究[J].中国全科医学,2016,19(4):442-446. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.04.017.
[14] 潘小炎. 广西全科医生综合素质评价指标体系研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2013.
[15] 刘瑶, 祝墡珠, 张向杰, 等. 全科医生规范化培训临床教学基地师资准入标准研究[J].中华全科医师杂志, 2014,13(7): 534-538. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2014.07.003.
[16] Srinivasan M, Li ST, Meyers FJ, et al. “Teaching as a competency”: competencies for medical educators[J]. Acad Med, 2011,86(10):1211-1220. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822c5b9a.
[17] Li AT, Lin JW. Constructing core competency indicators for clinical teachers in Taiwan: a qualitative analysis and an analytic hierarchy process[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2014,14:75. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-75.
[18] 李智莉, 葛彩英, 赵新颖, 等. 全科医师科研能力的现状、存在问题和对策分析[J].继续医学教育,2020,34(4):51-53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2020.04.027.
[19] 邵爽, 金光辉, 陈超, 等. 2003-2012年全科医学学科相关科研论文的分布情况研究[J].中国全科医学,2015(1):116-120. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2015.01.38.
[20] 王一杰, 于婷婷, 李梦涵, 等. 全科师资胜任力现状及国内外评价标准研究[J]. 中国毕业后医学教育, 2020,4(6): 561-564,572. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2020.06.021.
[21] 姚隆, 曾闽榕, 李华, 等. 我国住院医师规范化培训的现状与对策[J]. 海南医学, 2018,29(11): 1612-1614.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2018.11.041.
[22] 吴佩丽, 张素素, 孙嘉. “双轨合一”模式下医学专业型研究生科研素质提升实践与探索[J].医学教育研究与实践,2018,26(5):804-807. DOI: 10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2018.05.024.
[23] 纪伟伟, 蔡梓薇, 勾天瑜, 等. 综合性医院全科医学师资建设中的问题与应对策略[J].中国卫生产业,2017,14(26):196-198. DOI: 10.16659/j.cnki.1672-5654.2017.26.196.
[24] 朱庆双, 贾建国, 樊洁, 等. “5+3”全科医师规范化培训临床师资培养实践与探索[J].医学教育管理,2019,5(3):222-224. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2019.03.006.

综合性医院全科医学临床带教师资综合评价指标体系初步构建

Preliminary construction of a comprehensive evaluation index system for general practice clinical teaching instructors in general hospitals

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李小敏, 张文玉, 段一菲, 罗小娟, 于千惠, 张莉, 罗新乐. 医学专业硕士研究生“三全育人”思想政治教育评价指标体系构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024, 44(8): 629-633.
[2]	肖莹晶, 尼春萍, 娄艳, 李朝慧, 林悦, 李洋, 画妍. 基于决策导向模式的基础护理学实践教学评价指标体系构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024, 44(6): 416-420.
[3]	郝立晓, 李静, 陈丽芬, 陈超, 王亚军, 贾建国. 我国全科医学临床带教师资岗位胜任力评价指标体系研究现状[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024, 44(10): 791-795.
[4]	陈灵杉, 朱倩寅, 沈又纲, 沈翠珍. 高校课程思政评价指标体系构建研究述评[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(7): 553-557.
[5]	王格格, 曾盈, 李觉. 临床医学专业本科毕业生培养质量评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(2): 180-184.
[6]	杨英, 姜辉. 加拿大家庭医学强化技能培训及其启示[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(7): 665-669.
[7]	屈京楼, 朱亚鑫, 曲波. 德尔菲法在医学教育研究中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2019, 39(3): 227-230.
[8]	赵电红, 刘杰, 郑利光. 构建口腔医学院校药物学教师岗位胜任力评价指标体系的研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2019, 39(10): 795-800.
[9]	刘小康, 蔡景一, 王海俊. 应用优序图法确定医学本科生一般能力评价指标体系的研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2017, 37(5): 749-752.