中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 553-557.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220823-01070

• 医学教育评估 • 上一篇    

高校课程思政评价指标体系构建研究述评

陈灵杉1, 朱倩寅1, 沈又纲2, 沈翠珍2   

  1. 1浙江中医药大学护理学院内科护理学教研室,杭州 310053;
    2浙江中医药大学教师教学发展中心 高等教育研究所,杭州 310053
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-23 发布日期:2023-06-30
  • 通讯作者: 沈翠珍, Email: shencuizhen@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省第一批省级课程思政教学项目(126);教育部2021年第二批产学合作协同育人项目(202102070027)

Review on the construction of evaluation index system of curricular political and virtuous awareness in universities

Chen Lingshan1, Zhu Qianyin1, Shen Yougang2, Shen Cuizhen2   

  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University School of Nursing, Hangzhou 310053, China;
    2Teachers′ Teaching Development Center & Institute of Higher Education, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China
  • Received:2022-08-23 Published:2023-06-30
  • Contact: Shen Cuizhen, Email: shencuizhen@163.com
  • Supported by:
    The First Batch of Provincial Curricular Political and Virtuous Awareness Teaching Projects of Zhejiang Province(126); The Second Batch of Industry-University Cooperation Collaborative Education Projects in 2021 of Ministry of Education of the People′s Republic of China (202102070027)

摘要: 目的 对高校课程思政评价指标体系构建的研究进行分析,了解课程思政评价指标体系构建的现状和问题。方法 以“课程思政”“评价体系”“评价指标体系”为关键词检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普中文科技期刊数据库的期刊论文,检索年限为2017年1月1日至2022年8月20日,对检索结果进行描述性统计分析。结果 共检索出论文118篇,最早的论文发表于2018年,其中,25篇(21.2%)论文描述了评价指标体系的构建方法。这25篇论文中,有9篇(36.0%)的评价指标体系只采用单一构建方法,16篇(64.0%)的评价主体为教师和学生,有11篇(44.0%)的评价指标体系有明确的权重赋值,4篇(16.0%)的评价指标体系进行了信效度检验。结论 高校课程思政评价指标体系构建的研究逐渐受到重视,但是评价指标体系构建过程的科学性有待提高,评价主体有待多元,内容有待完善。

关键词: 述评, 课程思政, 评价指标体系

Abstract: Objective To analyze the research on the construction of evaluation index system of curricular political and virtuous awareness in universities, and to describe the current situation and problems thereof. Methods Relevant literature were retrieved inChina National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals by the key words ″curricular political and virtuous awareness″ and ″evaluation system″ and ″evaluation index system″ from Jan 1st, 2017 to Aug 20th, 2022. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results A total of 118 papers were retrieved. The earliest article was published in 2018. Among them, 25 papers (21.2%) described the construction methods of evaluation index system. Among the 25 papers, the evaluation index systems of 9 papers (36.0%) merely used single construction method, and 16 papers (64.0%) chose teachers and students as evaluation subjects. Only 11 papers (44.0%) had clear weight assignments of the evaluation index systems, and reliability and validity were analyzed in 4 papers (16.0%). Conclusions More and more attention has been paid on the research of the construction of evaluation index system of curricular political and virtuous awareness in universities. However, the scientificity of the construction process of the evaluation index system needs to be improved, the evaluation subject needs to be diversified and the evaluate content needs to be improved.

Key words: Editorial, Curricular political and virtuous awareness, Evaluation index system

中图分类号: