中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 377-382.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250821-00990

• 医学教育评估 • 上一篇    下一篇

医学模拟中心专职人员岗位胜任力评价指标体系构建研究

胡琦琦, 任黎   

  1. 四川大学华西第二医院筑浪学院医学模拟中心,成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-21 出版日期:2026-05-01 发布日期:2026-04-30
  • 通讯作者: 任黎,Email:shirley1984310@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    四川大学华西第二医院2024年医院党政管理研究项目(GLYJ2024-12)

Research on the construction of a competency evaluation index system for full-time personnel in medical simulation centers

Hu Qiqi, Ren Li   

  1. Medical Simulation Center, Zhulang Career Development Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2025-08-21 Online:2026-05-01 Published:2026-04-30
  • Contact: Ren Li,Email:shirley1984310@163.com
  • Supported by:
    The 2024 Hospital Party and Administrative Management Research Project of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University (GLYJ2024-12)

摘要: 目的 立足医学模拟中心专职人员岗位的实际需要,构建一套适合我国医学模拟中心专职人员的岗位胜任力评价指标体系,为医学模拟中心专职人员的内涵建设提供参考。方法 2025年2至6月,通过国内外文献分析初步建立医学模拟中心专职人员岗位胜任力评价指标,选取19名医学教育领域经验丰富的专家,采用德尔菲法开展2轮结构化咨询确立指标体系,并采用层次分析法确定各级指标权重。结果 2轮专家咨询有效问卷回收率均为100.0%,专家权威系数均为0.85,专家的肯德尔协调系数分别为0.244和0.232(均P<0.05)。构建的评价指标体系包括3个一级指标、12个二级指标、54个三级指标。结论 医学模拟中心专职人员岗位胜任力评价指标体系较为完善,专家共识度高,可以为医学模拟中心专职人员的内涵建设提供依据。

关键词: 人员管理, 医学模拟中心, 专职人员, 岗位胜任力, 德尔菲法, 评价指标体系

Abstract: Objective To address the practical needs of full-time personnel in medical simulation centers, a competency evaluation index system suitable for full-time personnel of domestic medical simulation centers has been established to inform the capacity building of these personnel. Methods From February to June 2025, through analysis of domestic and international literature, preliminary competency evaluation indicators for full-time personnel in domestic medical simulation centers were established. A total of 19 experienced experts in the field of medical education were selected to conduct two rounds of structured consultations using the Delphi method to establish the indicator system and the analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weights of indicators at all levels. Results The effective response rates for both rounds of expert consultation were 100.0%. The expert authority coefficients were 0.85 for both rounds, and the Kendall′s coefficient of concordance were 0.244 and 0.232, respectively (all P<0.05). The constructed evaluation index system comprises 3 primary indicators, 12 secondary indicators, and 54 tertiary indicators. Conclusions The constructed competency evaluation index system for full-time personnel in medical simulation centers is comprehensive and demonstrates a high level of expert consensus. A valuable reference for enhancing the capacity building of full-time personnel in medical simulation centers can be provided.

Key words: Personnel management, Medical simulation center, Personnel, Competency, Delphi method, Evaluation index system

中图分类号: