中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 310-314.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240312-00239

• 医学教育评估 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于产业需求导向的药学类专业发展指标体系构建

许扬名1, 宋建飞2, 姚文兵3   

  1. 1中国药科大学国际医药商学院2021级公共管理专业硕士研究生,南京 211198;
    2南京大学教育研究院高等教育研究所,南京 210008;
    3中国药科大学国际医药商学院,南京 211198
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-12 出版日期:2025-04-01 发布日期:2025-03-31
  • 通讯作者: 宋建飞,Email: songjianfei2013@126.com; 姚文兵,Email: wbyao_cpu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国药科大学高等药学教育科学规划课题(1302140001-045)

Construction of pharmacy professional development indicator system based on industrial demand orientation

Xu Yangming1, Song Jianfei2, Yao Wenbing3   

  1. 1 Master's Degree in Public Administration, Class of 2021, School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China;
    2 Institute of Higher Education, Graduate School of Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China;
    3 School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University , Nanjing 211198, China
  • Received:2024-03-12 Online:2025-04-01 Published:2025-03-31
  • Contact: Song Jianfei, Email: songjianfei2013@126.com; Yao Wenbing, Email: wbyao_cpu@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Scientific Planning Project of Higher Pharmaceutical Education in China Pharmaceutical University (1302140001-045)

摘要: 目的 基于产业需求构建药学类专业发展指标体系,以期在专业结构调整、人才培养方面与产业需求相适应。方法 通过文献分析法和德尔菲法构建指标体系,运用百分权重法确定各项指标权重。结果 2轮函询问卷有效回收率均≥80%,权威系数为0.74,肯德尔协同系数分别为0.110、0.150(均P<0.001)。最终形成包含4个一级指标、16个二级指标和49个三级指标的药学类专业发展指标体系。结论 构建的药学类专业发展指标体系具有科学性,可以为药学类专业设置动态调整和专业人才培养提供参考。

关键词: 药学, 产业需求, 德尔菲法, 专业发展, 指标体系

Abstract: Objective To construct a professional development index system for pharmacy-related majors based on industrial demand, in order to adapt to industrial demand in professional restructuring and talent cultivation. Methods The indexes were screened by literature analysis method and Delphi method, and the weights of the indexes were determined by using the percentage weight method. Results The effective recovery rate of the questionnaires in the 2 rounds of correspondence inquiry was ≥80%, the authority coefficient was 0.74, and the Kendall's W values were 0.110 and 0.150 (both P<0.001), finally forming a pharmacy professional development indicator system containing 4 primary indicators, 16 secondary indicators and 49 tertiary indicators. Conclusions The professional development index system of pharmacy-related majors is scientific and can inform the dynamic adjustment of professional settings and talent cultivation.

Key words: Pharmacy, Industrial demand, Delphi method, Professional development, Evaluation index system

中图分类号: