中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 316-320.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230511-00475

• 医学教育评估 • 上一篇    

药学院教师思想政治和师德师风评估体系的构建

王珣1, 赵姗2   

  1. 1北京大学药学院学科与师资建设办公室,北京 100191;
    2北京大学药学院,北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-11 出版日期:2024-04-01 发布日期:2024-03-29
  • 通讯作者: 赵姗, Email: zhaoshan@bjmu.edu.cn

Construction of evaluation system of faculties' ideological, political and professional ethics in school of pharmaceutical sciences

Wang Xun1, Zhao Shan2   

  1. 1Office of Academic Development and Human Resources, Peking University School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China;
    2 Peking University School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2023-05-11 Online:2024-04-01 Published:2024-03-29
  • Contact: Zhao Shan, Email: zhaoshan@bjmu.edu.cn

PDF (PC)

42

摘要： 目的 构建药学院教师思想政治和师德师风评估体系。方法 采用文献研究法初步确定了药学院教师思想政治和师德师风评估指标、评估办法、评估流程。然后,采用德尔菲法对18名专家进行2轮意见征询。结果 2轮专家咨询均回收有效问卷18份;第二轮咨询的评估指标变异系数小于17.5%,Kendall协调系数为0.388,P<0.001,克朗巴赫系数为0.682,每项二级指标所采用评估办法均有17位及以上专家同意,每类评估流程均得到全部专家同意。根据专家意见调整和优化后形成了包括6项一级指标、33项二级指标的药学院教师思想政治和师德师风评估指标;确定了包括个人自评,所在党支部、授课对象、课题组成员、教师工作小组分别对其评估的5种评估办法,以及各项二级指标所选取的评估办法;确定了包括人才引进、预聘制中期评估和届满评估、研究技术系列届满评估等5类评估流程。结论 药学院教师思想政治和师德师风评估体系较为全面、有效、易于执行,可以为高校二级学院开展教师思想政治和师德师风评估提供参考。

关键词: 药学, 教师, 思想政治和师德师风, 评估体系

Abstract: Objective To construct the evaluation system of faculties' ideological, political and professional ethics in school of pharmaceutical sciences. Methods The literature research method was used to determine the evaluation indicators, evaluation patterns, and evaluation processes preliminary. Delphi method were used to conduct subsequent two rounds of expert consultation to 18 experts. Results The effective questionnaire response number for both rounds of expert consultation was 18. The coefficient of variation of evaluation indicators for the second round of consultation was less than 17.5%, Kendall's coordination coefficient was 0.388 (P<0.001), Cronbach's α was 0.682. Seventeen or more experts agreed on the evaluation method, and all experts agreed on each type of evaluation process. An evaluation index consisting of 6 primary indicators and 33 secondary indicators have been formed; five evaluation methods selected for different secondary indicators have been determined; five evaluation processes have been determined after adjusting and optimizing according to expert opinions. Conclusions The evaluation system for the ideological and political education and professional ethics of faculties in school of pharmaceutical sciences is relatively comprehensive, effective, and easy to implement, which provide a reference for the evaluation of the ideological and political education and professional ethics of faculties in secondary schools/colleges of universities.

Key words: Pharmacy, Faculty, Faculties' ideological, political and professional ethics, Evaluation system

中图分类号: