住院医师规范化培训专业基地过程性评价体系的构建与思考

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230222-00166

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 58-62.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230222-00166

住院医师规范化培训专业基地过程性评价体系的构建与思考

谢文照¹, 何庆南²

¹中南大学湘雅三医院毕业后医学教育办公室,长沙 410013;
²中南大学湘雅三医院,长沙 410013

收稿日期:2023-02-22 出版日期:2024-01-01 发布日期:2023-12-29
通讯作者: 何庆南, Email: heqn2629@csu.edu.cn
基金资助:
2021年湖南省卫生健康委员会科研课题一般资助项目(202115011989)

Construction and reflection on the process evaluation system of professional bases for standardized residency training

Xie Wenzhao¹, He Qingnan²

¹Postgraduate Medical Education Office, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China;
²The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China

Received:2023-02-22 Online:2024-01-01 Published:2023-12-29
Contact: He Qingnan, Email: heqn2629@csu.edu.cn
Supported by:
2021 Hunan Provincial Health Commission Scientific Research General Funding Project (202115011989)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的构建住院医师规范化培训(简称“住培”)专业基地过程性评价体系。方法 2022年12月至2023年3月,基于背景—输入—过程—结果评价模型(context-input-process-product evaluation)(简称CIPP模型),借鉴中国住院医师核心胜任力框架,采用德尔菲法构建住院医师规范化培训专业基地过程性评价指标体系,采用克朗巴赫系数和内容效度指数计算专家咨询问卷的信度及效度。结果遴选来自中南大学3所附属医院9个专业的18位专家进行咨询,专家权威系数为0.867。构建的指标体系包括4个一级指标(背景、输入、过程、结果)、7个二级指标(培训目标、生源质量、培训方案、指导医师教学水平、住院医师胜任力水平、住培结业考核结果、住院医师就业情况)和18个三级指标,并明确了每个指标的具体内容和评分方法。第二轮专家咨询问卷的克朗巴赫系数为0.937,内容效度指数为0.960。结论基于CIPP模型构建的住培专业基地过程性评价体系具有权威性,指标体系具有良好的信度及效度,实现了对住培专业基地培训全过程的评价和动态监测,促进了住培内涵建设,有助于保障和提高住院医师的胜任力。

关键词: 评价研究, 住院医师规范化培训, 专业基地, 胜任力导向, 背景—输入—过程—结果评价模型, 过程性评价, 指标体系, 德尔菲法

Abstract: Objective To construct a process evaluation system of professional bases for standardized residency training (referred to as ″residency training″). Methods From December 2022 to March 2023, anevaluation index system of professional bases for standardized residency training was constructed based on the context-input-process-product evaluation model (CIPP model), drawing on the core competency framework for residents in China, using the Delphi method, and Cronbach's coefficient and content validity index to calculate the reliability and validity of the expert consultation questionnaire. Results Eighteen experts from nine specialties in three hospitals of Central South University were selected for consultation, and the expert authority coefficient was 0.867. The constructed index system included four first-level indexes (content, input, process, and product), seven second-level indexes (training objectives, quality of the student population, training program, teaching level of the supervising physician, competency level of the residents, results of the residency completion assessment, and residents' employment status) and 18 tertiary indicators, and the specific content and scoring method of each indicator were clarified. The Cronbach's coefficient of the second round of expert consultation questionnaire was 0.937, and the content validity index was 0.960. Conclusions The process evaluation system of the professional base of residency training constructed based on the CIPP model is authoritative, and the index system has a good degree of credibility and validity, which realizes the evaluation of the whole process of the training in the professional base of residency training, and the dynamic monitoring of the professional base, promotes the connotation construction of residency training, and helps to guarantee and improve the competence of residents.

Key words: Evaluation studies, Standardized residency training, Professional base, Competency orientation, Context-input-process-product evaluation model, Process evaluation, Index system, Delphi method

中图分类号:

R-05

谢文照, 何庆南. 住院医师规范化培训专业基地过程性评价体系的构建与思考[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024, 44(1): 58-62.

Xie Wenzhao, He Qingnan. Construction and reflection on the process evaluation system of professional bases for standardized residency training[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2024, 44(1): 58-62.

参考文献

[1] 中国医师协会.中国医师协会关于印发住培内容与标准、基地标准(2022年版)的通知[EB/OL]. (2022-08-15)[2023-03-10].https://www.ccgme-cmda.cn/news/15117/article.
[2] 方才妹, 吴振龙. 2018年住院医师规范化培训基地评估特点浅析[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2019,3(2):97-102.
[3] 方才妹, 周玉皆, 胡素佩, 等. 住院医师规范化培训基地评估与认证一体化实施的思考[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2021,5(5):385-390. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2021.05.001.
[4] 姜晓莹, 陈予宁, 陈蓬来, 等. 住院医师规范化培训基地和专业基地协同运作的实践与思考[J].全科医学临床与教育,2021,19(8):673-675. DOI: 10.13558/j.cnki.issn1672-3686.2021.008.001.
[5] 周玉皆, 康丽娜, 乔羽, 等. 内科专业基地评估存在的问题及建议[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2018,2(1):18-21,25.
[6] 李腾飞. 新时代教师专业发展过程性评价体系初探[J].教育实践与研究,2023(15):8-10.
[7] 王强, 顾志娥, 陈晖, 等. 基于信息技术的过程管理联动院级督导对住培教学活动、培训质量的影响[J].江苏卫生事业管理,2022,33(6):820-823. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7803.2022.06.034.
[8] 战京燕, 王少坤, 娄景秋, 等. 基于PDCA循环的院级督导在提高住培教学阅片质量和内涵建设中的作用[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2023,7(6):467-471. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2023.06.009.
[9] 黄虑, 姜昊文, 周颖杰, 等. 住院医师规范化培训基地形成性评价的实施与管理[J].中国继续医学教育,2022,14(11):190-193. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2022.11.050.
[10] Gandomkar R. Comparing Kirkpatrick's original and new model with CIPP evaluation model[J]. J Adv Med Educ Prof, 2018,6(2):94-95.
[11] Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Englander R, et al. A call to action: the controversy of and rationale for competency-based medical education[J]. Med Teach, 2017,39(6):574-581. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315067.
[12] 王金梅. 基于CIPP模型的护理本科人才培养核心竞争力评价指标体系的构建与初步应用研究[D]. 南昌:南昌大学,2022.
[13] Ten Cate O. Competency-based postgraduate medical education: past, present and future[J]. GMS J Med Educ, 2017,34(5):Doc69. DOI: 10.3205/zma001146.
[14] Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world[J]. Lancet, 2010,376(9756):1923-1958. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.
[15] 李海潮. 第二代医学教育改革与胜任力导向医学教育的关系分析[J].中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(11):801-806. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.11.001.
[16] 蓝妍玲, 乡汝浩, 刘智慧, 等. 带教师资视角下的住院医师规范化培训现状与对策研究——基于CIPP评价模型[J].现代医院,2023,23(1):133-136,139. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-332X.2023.01.037.
[17] 刘明鼎, 张艳敏. 基于CIPP评价模型的混合式教学模式评价体系构建探究[J].吉林省教育学院学报,2023,39(3):127-134. DOI: 10.16083/j.cnki.1671-1580.2023.03.023.
[18] 王勤, 熊丽娟, 熊莉娟. 基于德尔菲专家咨询法构建综合医院病区分类评价指标研究[J].护理研究,2019,33(13):2345-2347. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2019.13.040.
[19] 孙振球.医学统计学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:510-514.
[20] 薛晓琳, 王天芳, 于春光, 等. 疲劳自评量表的信、效度评价[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2008,28(6):550-554. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-5370.2008.06.019.
[21] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):152-155. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
[22] 白娟, 禄保平, 张超. 加强住院医师规范化培训信息化平台建设的思考[J].中医药管理杂志,2021,29(5):183-186.
[23] 祁伟, 张卓, 李晓瑜, 等. 住院医师规范化培训信息化管理系统建设的思考[J].中国继续医学教育,2023,15(10):174-177. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2023.10.039.

住院医师规范化培训专业基地过程性评价体系的构建与思考

Construction and reflection on the process evaluation system of professional bases for standardized residency training

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐杭, 侯建林, 王维民. 调控本科临床医学专业招生规模的院校教育资源指标体系构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024, 44(1): 1-5.
[2]	姚瑶, 刘莹, 邓宇璇, 穆攀伟, 陈璐, 黎尚荣. 内科住院医师规范化培训基地指导医师教学查房培训效果研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024, 44(1): 48-52.
[3]	沈丽琼, 罗璐瑶, 何莉, 陈谨瑜, 张岑, 叶燕青, 王时雨, 黄梦婷. 基于PDCA循环的住院医师规范化培训出科考核改革研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024, 44(1): 63-67.
[4]	泮丹红, 金巍巍, 鲁超, 马君, 牟一平. 多学科协作教学在胰腺外科住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(9): 697-700.
[5]	任晔, 潘溯洋, 张津铭, 熊伟, 祝文涛. 住院医师临床研究论文撰写现状及培训需求的调查与分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(8): 590-594.
[6]	晏文娟, 邬卫东, 訾聃, 李悦鸣, 文秀, 孙思莹. 贵州省妇产科住院医师规范化培训学员核心胜任力的调查与分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(8): 625-628.
[7]	弓婷婷, 刘建华, 李昕, 刘纯岩, 陈野, 胡海霞, 贾胜男. 基于分层递进的线上线下教学在放射科住院医师规范化培训中的探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(8): 629-632.
[8]	包文晗, 王悦. 临床病理讨论会在肾内科住院医师规范化培训中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(7): 525-528.
[9]	艾慧俊, 周利芬, 戴丽雅, 卢陈英, 周宁, 叶玲红, 陈方红. 分级进阶式以图导学在住院医师心脏超声教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(7): 534-538.
[10]	严飞, 柴栖晨, 吕晶, 陈进. 全科医学专业住院医师规范化培训学员对缓和医疗的认知和培训需求调查[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(7): 539-542.
[11]	陈灵杉, 朱倩寅, 沈又纲, 沈翠珍. 高校课程思政评价指标体系构建研究述评[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(7): 553-557.
[12]	潘赛英, 周汝云, 陈宏翔, 李偶连, 杨荣萍. 形成性评价在住院医师核心胜任力培养中的应用探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(6): 467-470.
[13]	刘芳, 王凌云, 刘维维. 以胜任力为导向的社区慢性病管理专科护士培训方案的构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(5): 321-325.
[14]	齐殿君, 江南, 于晓松. 我国高校附属医院开展全科医学住院医师规范化培训情况调查[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(4): 298-302.
[15]	向军, 徐莉莉, 蔡敏, 张雯, 蔡定芳, 杨云柯. 中医住院医师规范化培训研究的可视化分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(4): 303-306.