中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 221-224.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2020.03.015

• 医学教育评估 • 上一篇    下一篇

护理学博士研究生学术论文水平评价的分析与思考

赵立成1, 姜兆权2, 李红玉3   

  1. 1锦州医科大学学生处 121000;
    2锦州医科大学护理学院内科护理学教研室 121000;
    3锦州医科大学医学教育研究所 121000
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-18 发布日期:2020-12-10
  • 通讯作者: 李红玉, Email: medicaler@163.com, 电话: 0416-4673107

Analysis and reflection on the evaluation of academic papers of nursing doctoral students

Zhao Licheng1, Jiang Zhaoquan2, Li Hongyu3   

  1. 1Student Office of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, China;
    2Department of Internal Medicine Nursing of Nursing College of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, China;
    3Medical Education Institute of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, China
  • Received:2019-04-18 Published:2020-12-10
  • Contact: Li Hongyu, Email: medicaler@163.com, Tel: 0086-416-4673107

PDF (PC)

11

摘要： 目的 探讨学科评估背景下护理学专业博士研究生学术论文存在的问题,为护理学专业学科建设提供科学依据。方法 2019年1月,以国内23家护理学博士一级学科授权点单位2015年12月至2018年12月的博士研究生学术论文为研究对象,收集每所院校20篇英文论文,10篇中文论文。从论文分类、影响因子、引用次数、第一作者及通讯作者单位情况等方面对论文进行分析。结果 共收集688篇论文。其中,护理学专业论文占比46.2%(318/688),与护理学专业相关的论文占比35.6%(245/688),其他学术论文占比18.2%(125/688)。护理学专业论文和护理学专业相关论文来源期刊影响因子最高为6.02,其中影响因子大于3的期刊论文占比4.5%(31/688);其他学术论文来源期刊影响因子最高为14.09,其中影响因子大于3的期刊论文占比6.2% (41/688)。以院校为单位计算,所提交论文被引用次数合计最高为522次,最低为19次。第一作者单位与提交论文单位不同的论文占比2.3%(16/688)。在某些院校提交的论文中,甚至有10.0%(3/30)的论文第一作者和通讯作者均非本单位作者。结论 23所院校提交的论文中非护理学专业学术论文偏多,这说明一些院校对护理学科的发展目标定位尚不够准确。护理学专业学术论文所载期刊影响因子及论文被引用次数偏低。未来在学科建设中应该明确护理学科的发展方向,加强护理学科的纵向研究,提高护理学专业学术论文的质量。

关键词: 护理学, 学科评估, 学术论文评审, 一级学科

Abstract: Objective To explore the problems existing in the Doctoral students' academic papers of nursing under the background of subject evaluation, so as to provide scientific basis for the discipline construction of nursing. Methods From January 2019, 20 English papers and 10 Chinese papers were collected from 23 domestic primary discipline authorized units of nursing from December 2015 to December 2018. This paper analyzes the classification, influencing factors, citation times and the first author and corresponding author units. Results Totally 688 papers were collected. Among them, nursing professional papers accounted for 46.2% (318 / 688), nursing related papers accounted for 35.6% (245 / 688), and other academic papers accounted for 18.2% (125 / 688). The highest influential factors of nursing professional papers and nursing related papers were 6.02, of which 4.5% (31 / 688) were papers with more than 3 influencing factors, and 14.09 (41 / 688) were other academic papers with more than 3 influencing factors. Calculated by institutions, the total number of citations of submitted papers is 522 at most and 19 at least. 2.3% (16 / 688) of the papers were from the first author's unit and the submitting unit. Among the papers submitted by some universities, even 10.0% (3 / 30) of the first authors and corresponding authors are not authors of their own units. Conclusions There are more academic papers of non nursing major submitted by 23 colleges and universities, which indicates that some colleges and universities are not accurate enough in the development goal orientation of nursing discipline. The influencing factors and cited times of nursing academic papers are low. In the future, we should make clear the development direction of nursing discipline, strengthen the vertical research of nursing discipline, and improve the quality of nursing professional academic papers.

Key words: Nursing, Subject evaluation, Academic paper evaluation, First level subject

中图分类号: