形成性评价研究可视化分析及其对医学教育的启示

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20221122-01466

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 861-865.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20221122-01466

形成性评价研究可视化分析及其对医学教育的启示

钱能, 周鸿鲲, 俞清江

嘉兴学院附属医院肝胆胰外科,嘉兴 314401

收稿日期:2022-10-20 出版日期:2023-11-01 发布日期:2023-10-31
通讯作者: 俞清江, Email: 41995337@qq.com
基金资助:
嘉兴学院临床教学基地教改专项(851521084)

Visual analysis of formative assessment and inspiration of medical education

Qian Neng, Zhou Hongkun, Yu Qingjiang

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314401, China

Received:2022-10-20 Online:2023-11-01 Published:2023-10-31
Contact: Yu Qingjiang, Email: 41995337@qq.com
Supported by:
Education and Teaching Reform Research Progect of Clinical Teaching Base of Jiaxing University (851521084)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过可视化软件分析国内外形成性评价相关文献,为我国教育相关领域形成性评价研究提供参考。方法 2022年7月分别检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普中文科技期刊数据库和Web of Science(WOS)数据库中于1990年1月至2022年6月发表的和形成性评价相关的中英文文献,并采用Citespace软件进行归纳分析总结,分析内容包括发文量、作者、国家、研究机构、引用关系、关键词等。结果共纳入5 537篇中文文献和5 096篇英文文献。近几年中文发文量基本稳定,英文发文量有明显升高趋势。作者方面,国内以中国医科大学齐殿军和湖北大学施德安2个团队影响力较大,国际上以Black,Sadler 等影响力最大。从国家来看,美国、英国、澳大利亚发表文献数量分列前3位,国内发表文献最多的机构为新疆医科大学,英文文献中以明尼苏达大学发文最多。中文高频关键词包括大学英语、教学评价、教学改革等,英文高频关键词为formative assessment,student,education等。近几年国内研究热点为翻转课堂、教学改革、线上教学等,而engagement,assessment literacy,student perception等为英文文献研究的新热点。结论目前国内外形成性评价研究的侧重点和趋势不尽相同,我国研究方向不够明确,建议对形成性评价研究进行更加系统的规划,促进教育事业特别是医学教育健康发展。

关键词: 教育,医学, 形成性评价, 可视化分析

Abstract: Objective To analyze the literatures about formative assessment both in Chinese and English with visual analysis software, and lay a foundation for subsequent research of formative assessment in education related fields in China. Methods In July 2022, the literatures on formative evaluation from January 1991 to June 2022 in CNKI, VIP Periodical, Wanfang Data and Web of Science databases were searched respectively. Citespace software was used to summarize and analyze the literatures. All of the following were analyzed including number, author, country, institution, key words, citation relationship, etc. Results A total of 5 537 Chinese articles and 5 096 English articles were included for following-up analysis. The number of Chinese articles was basically stable while English articles was significantly increased in recent years. Two teams of Dianjun Qi from China Medical University, De′an Shi from Hubei University had great influence in China while Black, Sadler had the greatest influence internationally. The United States, the United Kingdom and Australia were the top three countries publishing most literatures. The Xinjiang Medical University and University of Minnesota published most literatures in Chinese and in English respectively. College English, teaching evaluation, teaching reform and formative assessment, student, education were the key words with the highest frequencies in Chinese and English literatures respectively. Recent Chinese literatures focused on flipped classroom, teaching reform, online learning while engagement, assessment literacy, student perception were the focuses of English literatures in recent years. Conclusions The focus and trend of formative assessment research in China and abroad have many differences and our research direction is not clear enough. We should carry out more systematic planning of formative evaluation research and promote the healthy development of education, especially in medical education.

Key words: Education,medical, Formative assessment, Visual analysis

中图分类号:

R-05

钱能, 周鸿鲲, 俞清江. 形成性评价研究可视化分析及其对医学教育的启示[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(11): 861-865.

Qian Neng, Zhou Hongkun, Yu Qingjiang. Visual analysis of formative assessment and inspiration of medical education[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2023, 43(11): 861-865.

参考文献

[1] 张进, 杨立斌, 张淑娥, 等. 形成性评价在本科临床医学教育中的实施现状与提升策略[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(4): 372-375. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20201014-01469.
[2] 潘赛英, 周汝云, 陈宏翔, 等. 形成性评价在住院医师核心胜任力培养中的应用探索[J].中华医学教育杂志,2023,43(6):467-470. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220906-01119.
[3] Chen C. CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. J Am Soc Inf Sci, 2006,57(3): 359-377. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20317.
[4] 韩颖, 赖晓全, 熊薇, 等. 基于Citespace软件的医院感染文献可视化分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2019,29(20):3154-3158. DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2019-191882.
[5] Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences[M]. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 1988: 1-579. DOI: 10.4324/9780203771587.
[6] Nicol DJ,Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice[J]. Stud high educ,2006,31(2): 199-218. DOI: 10.1080/03075070600572090.
[7] Hattie J,Timperley H. The power of feedback[J]. Rev Educ Res,2007,77(1):81-112. DOI: 10.3102/003465430298487.
[8] Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback[J]. Rev Educ Res,2007,78(1):153-189. DOI:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2007.tb02053.x.
[9] Black P,Wiliam D. Developing the theory of formative assessment[J]. Educ Assess Eval Acc,2009,21(1):5-31. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
[10] Bennett RE. Formative assessment: a critical review[J]. Assess Educ: Princ Policy Pract,2011,18(1): 5-25. DOI:10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678.
[11] Wiliam D. Embedded formative assessment[M]. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press,2011,1-200.
[12] Boud D, Molloy E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design[J]. Assess Eval High Edu, 2013, 38(6): 698-712. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
[13] Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods[M]. 4thed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2014, 1-832.
[14] Carless D,Boud D. The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback[J]. Assess Eval High Edu, 2018,43(8):1315-1325. DOI:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
[15] Black P, Wiliam D. Classroom assessment and pedagogy[J]. Assess Educ,2018,25(6):551-575. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807.

形成性评价研究可视化分析及其对医学教育的启示

Visual analysis of formative assessment and inspiration of medical education

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王慧, 周利华, 李紫夜, 延雪晴. 护理学跨专业教育研究的可视化分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(8): 570-573.
[2]	潘赛英, 周汝云, 陈宏翔, 李偶连, 杨荣萍. 形成性评价在住院医师核心胜任力培养中的应用探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(6): 467-470.
[3]	何斐, 黄春燕, 杨素铧, 胡志坚, 王晓茜, 王心妍, 王晴, 梁栋. 我国公共卫生实践教学基地研究热点和趋势的可视化分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(4): 241-244.
[4]	向军, 徐莉莉, 蔡敏, 张雯, 蔡定芳, 杨云柯. 中医住院医师规范化培训研究的可视化分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(4): 303-306.
[5]	王丹妮, 林世蕾, 李杰, 王鹏, 王婕妤, 陶兴永, 万宇辉. 基于项目的小组合作学习在预防医学课程教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(2): 127-130.
[6]	卢秀丽, 梁文丽, 黄凤莲. 我国护理硕士专业学位研究生教育研究热点的可视化分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(12): 1133-1137.
[7]	姜红宇, 梁磊, 孟怡辰, 闫敏, 时佳子, 王志农, 肖建如, 楼棪. 2000至2021年线上医学教学研究的热点与演化[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(10): 903-906.
[8]	于博, 张娜, 孔慧. 形成性评价结合医视考试系统在耳鼻咽喉科住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(4): 363-367.
[9]	张进, 杨立斌, 张淑娥, 赵晨曦, 曹德品. 形成性评价在本科临床医学教育中的实施现状与提升策略[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(4): 372-375.
[10]	李荣华, 林艳, 殷彩欣, 周英. 基于档案袋的形成性评价在儿科护理学双语教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(4): 376-380.
[11]	柳丽花, 张军, 刘晶, 彭骏, 丁静林. 依托SPOC的形成性评价在医学文献检索课程教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(3): 276-279.
[12]	郭洪彬, 王筝扬, 万英锋, 李新伟, 王义荣. 基于Python编程的形成性评价在神经外科住院医师临床思维能力培养中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(2): 175-178.
[13]	张进, 杨立斌, 郭庆峰, 曹德品. 形成性评价在本科临床医学教育中的应用研究综述[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(9): 731-735.
[14]	陈芳芳, 张京伟, 谢哲, 王欣. 混合式教学结合形成性评价在外科学实验教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(10): 784-787.
[15]	刘冰, 齐殿君. 操作技能直接观察评估在外科住院医师规范化培训中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2019, 39(7): 535-538.