中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 721-725.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.10.001

• 专稿 •    下一篇

中国临床医学专业(本科)认证工作的评价分析

张舒1, 王维民2, 陈娟3   

  1. 1北京大学公共卫生学院公共卫生硕士研究生 100191;
    2北京大学医学部 100191;
    3北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理学系 100191
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-10 出版日期:2019-10-01 发布日期:2020-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 陈娟,Email:chenjuan@bjmu.edu.cn,电话:010-82801521

Evaluation and analysis of the accreditation of the Chinese medical education (undergraduate)

Zhang Shu1, Wang Weimin2, Chen Juan3   

  1. 1Master of Public Health,School of Public Health,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;
    2Peking University Health Science Center,Beijing 100191,China;
    3Department of Health Policy and Management,School of Public Health,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China
  • Received:2019-04-10 Online:2019-10-01 Published:2020-12-09
  • Contact: Chen Juan,Email:chenjuan@bjmu.edu.cn,Tel:0086-10-82801521

摘要: 目的 对中国临床医学专业(本科)认证的实施主体、实施过程和认证结果进行评价,为中国临床医学专业认证工作提出建议。方法 2018年7月~2019年4月以《临床医学专业认证项目元评估指标体系研究》的框架为基础编制评价问卷,以认证专家为对象进行问卷调查,利用李克特评分得出定量评价结果,并结合访谈进行深入分析。结果 中国临床医学专业(本科)认证工作评价表涵盖实用性、可行性、正当性、准确性和评估问责5大维度,其中57个指标的评分在李克特5级量表中均高于4.00分,研究对象对我国临床医学专业认证工作的开展总体评价较高,但在进一步加强认证的客观性、加强对专家进行认证的同质化培训、合理规划认证行程、关注院校的持续改进、加强对临床医学专业认证的再评估等方面还需要进一步改进。结论 中国临床医学专业(本科)认证工作的开展在实用性、可行性、正当性、准确性和评估问责5大维度方面总体评价较好,在现行的评估模式中不失为一种合理的保障医学教育质量的方式;同时,在认证过程中存在着缺乏定量评价指标、对院校持续改进关注不足等问题。

关键词: 认证, 临床医学专业, 评价, 中国

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the implementation subjects,process and results of accreditation of the Chinese medical education (undergraduate),so as to put forward suggestions for implementation.Methods The paper adopts the method of questionnaire survey based on the framework of the study on the meta-evaluation index system of accreditation for the Chinese medical education projects from July 2018 to April 2019.The questions with low scores in the questionnaire were supplemented with expert interviews.Results The accreditation of the Chinese medical education (undergraduate) evaluation sheet covers five dimensions as follows:practicability,feasibility,validity,accuracy,and the assessment of accountability,also includes 57 items which scores are higher than 4.00 in the Richter magnitude scale,the objects of study carry out the higher evaluation in general,but they think the process of accreditation still have several questions,in the aspect of strengthening the objectivity of accreditation,enhancing the homogeneity of experts training,formulating reasonable planning accreditation schedule,paying attention to continuous improvement of colleges and universities,and reinforcing the re-evaluation of the accreditation of the Chinese medical education still need further improvement.Conclusions By the way of accreditation,it is concluded that the development of the accreditation of the Chinese medical education is generally good in five dimensions of practicality,feasibility,legitimacy,accuracy and evaluation and accountability.It can be regarded as a reasonable mode to guarantee the quality of medical education currently.However,there are still some weakness in the process of accreditation,such as the lack of quantitative evaluation indicators,insufficient attention to the continuous improvement of colleges and universities,and inter-group differences in expert evaluation.

Key words: Accreditation, Clinical medicine, Medical education

中图分类号: