中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 656-660.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20211229-01598

• 研究生教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

考官对临床医学硕士专业学位研究生网络远程复试效果的评价与反馈分析

徐昊, 于岩岩   

  1. 北京大学第一医院教育处,北京 100034
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-29 出版日期:2022-07-01 发布日期:2022-06-29
  • 通讯作者: 于岩岩, Email: yyy@bjmu.edu.cn

Evaluation and feedback analysis on the effect of remote retrial interview for professional master candidates of clinical medicine

Xu hao, Yu Yanyan   

  1. Education Department of Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2021-12-29 Online:2022-07-01 Published:2022-06-29
  • Contact: Yu Yanyan, Email: yyy@bjmu. edu. cn

摘要: 目的 分析某高校医学院参加临床医学硕士专业学位研究生网络远程复试的考官对该复试形式的效果评价与反馈情况,探讨该复试形式在新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情防控常态化下的有效性和可行性。方法 2021年3至5月,对2019至2021年参加某高校医学院临床医学硕士专业学位研究生招生复试工作的117名考官进行问卷调查,收集其对网络远程复试的满意度评价和临床技能操作考核方式的选择,了解网络远程复试存在的主要问题。采用Fisher精确检验进行数据分析。结果 97.4%(114/117)的考官认为2019年采用传统线下复试方式的考生符合或超出预期,93.2%(109/117)的考官认为2020至2021年采用网络远程复试方式的考生符合或超出预期,其差异无统计学意义(P=0.215)。考官对网络远程复试形式的整体满意度为84.6%(99/117);考官对“共享屏幕播放预录制的含不规范临床操作环节的视频录像,考生观看并同步纠错”评分最高(2.53 分); 考官认为网络远程复试存在问题排在前3位的是:对考生性格、心理健康情况难以直接观察[78.6%(92/117)],考生的临床技能操作水平难以评估[77.8%(91/117)];对网络和硬件设备要求高[76.1%(89/117)]和考生个体特征无法进行直接观察[76.1%(89/117)];61.5%(72/117)的考官认为网络远程复试不可替代传统线下复试。结论 复试考官对通过网络远程复试录取的考生和复试形式较为满意,网络远程复试和传统线下复试的生源质量一致,考生观看临床操作视频录像并同步纠错是考官认为的最佳临床技能操作考核方式,但网络远程复试无法完全替代传统线下复试。网络远程复试仍需在增强对考生个体特征考察的针对性、探索标准化的临床技能操作考核方式和加强网络技术支持方面进一步探索。

关键词: 临床医学, 专业学位研究生, 网络远程复试

Abstract: Objective To analyze the effect of evaluation and of feedback from online interview in Unified National Graduate Entrance Examination for professional master candidates of clinical medicine at a medical college,and to explore the effectiveness and feasibility of the online remote interview in the background of COVID-19 pandemic. Methods From March to May of 2021, 117 examiners who participated in the retrial at a medical college in Beijing from 2019 to 2021 were investigated by a questionnaire survey. The survey covers their satisfaction with online remote interview,the selection of clinical skill operation assessment methods for clinical skills and the main problems existing in the online remote interview. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results It was found that 97.4% (114/117) and 93.2% (109/117) examiners thought the candidates met their expectations in traditional offline interview in 2019 and in the online interview in 2020 respectively without statistical difference (P=0.215) and 84.6%(99/117) were satisfied with the retrial by online intervies. The examiner gave the highest score (2.53 points) on “sharing the screen to play the pre recorded video with non-standard clinical operation links, and the candidates can watch it and correct it synchronously”. The examiner thinks that the top three problems in the interview were as follows: Difficult to directly acknowlege examinee's personality and mental health [78.6% (92/117)], difficult to evaluate the examinee's clinical skill [77.8% (91/117)], sponge on achivability of network and hardware equipment [76.1% (89/117)] and it is impossible to directly observe the examinee's individual characteristics [76.1% (89/117)]. There are 61.5% (72 / 117) of the examiners believed that the online remote interview can not replace the offline interview. Conclusions The retrial examiners are satisfied with the candidates through remote interview as a retrial method. The quality of the candidats in the online interview is not significantly different with those joining offline interview. It is considered by the examiner the best way to assess clinical skills for candidates to watch clinical operation videos and correct errors synchronously. However, the remote online interview cannot completely replace the traditional offline interview. The remote interview still needs to enhance the pertinence of the investigation of the individual characteristics of candidates and a standardized clinical skill assessment methods and network support are needed.

Key words: Clinical medicine, Professional master, Retrial by online interview

中图分类号: