Research on the construction of evaluation index system of medical massive open online courses

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220831-01094

Abstract

Abstract: The application of massive open online courses (MOOC) in higher medical education is becoming more and more widespread, the evaluation of medical MOOC has raised considerable concern. Thus the medical MOOC evaluation index system has constructed in 4 steps. First, the evaluation module of medical MOOC is determined based on literature research. Second, the evaluation elements of medical MOOC are extracted through case study. On this basis, the construction of index system is completed through Delphi method, and finally the index weights were calculated via yaahp software. The medical MOOC evaluation index system consists of 5 primary indicators and 13 secondary indicators and their weights as well as 26 points of concern. The construction of the medical MOOC evaluation index system is guided by experts through two rounds of consultation questionnaires, the Cronbach's alpha of which were 0.822 and 0.910 respectively, and the content validity coefficient were 0.974 and 0.923 respectively. The index system has a certain degree of reliability and validity and can provide some reference for medical schools to carry out medical MOOC construction and evaluation.

Key words: Medical education, Medical MOOC, Evaluation, Index system, Delphi method

CLC Number:

R-05
G40-057

Li Xin, Huang Jingzhuo, Xie Jiajun, Li Xue, Zeng Shuo, He Yongtao, Huang Guoqiong. Research on the construction of evaluation index system of medical massive open online courses[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2023, 43(3): 231-235.

References

[1] Chen BY,Kern DE,Kearns RM,et al. From modules to moocs: application of the six-step approach to online curriculum development for medical education[J]. Acad Med,2019,94(5):678-685.DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002580.
[2] Pickering JD, Henningsohn L, DeRuiter MC, et al. Twelve tips for developing and delivering a massive open online course in medical education[J]. Med Teach, 2017,39(7):691-696. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1322189.
[3] Swinnerton BJ, Morris NP, Hotchkiss S, et al. The integration of an anatomy massive open online course (MOOC) into a medical anatomy curriculum[J]. Anat Sci Educ, 2017,10(1):53-67. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1625.
[4] 教育部教育信息化技术标准委员会.CELTS-22网络课程评价[EB/OL].(2002-06-07)[2022-08-31].http://www.celtsc.org/column/jgyzc_bztx.
[5] 邱均平, 欧玉芳. 慕课质量评价指标体系构建及应用研究[J].高教发展与评估,2015(5):72-81. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1672-8742.2015.05.010.
[6] 冯雪松,于青青,李晓明.在实践中探索MOOC评价体系[J].中国大学教学,2015(10):72-81,85.
[7] 童小素, 贾小军. MOOC质量评价体系的构建探究[J].中国远程教育(综合版),2017(5):63-71.
[8] 赵馨蕊, 周雨青, 瞿林云, 等. 基于层次分析法的大学物理MOOC教学质量评价指标体系的建构[J].物理与工程,2018,28(4):45-56. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7104.2018.04.004.
[9] 罗莎. 基于慕课的大学英语翻转课堂环境评价[J].外语电化教学,2018(4):16-22.
[10] 拉尔夫·泰勒.课程与教学的基本原理[M].罗康,张阅,译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2014:1-2.
[11] 李元静.全面质量管理在高校教学管理中的运用[D].成都:西南交通大学,2005.
[12] 罗建河. 论教育管理理论的知识论基础[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2006.
[13] 朱星荧. 我国高等职业教育教学质量保障体系完善研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2011.
[14] 熊立, 梁樑, 王国华. 层次分析法中数字标度的选择与评价方法研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(3):72-79. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6788.2005.03.011.
[15] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):152-155. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
[16] 任吉, 于佳琪. 熵权法在硕士研究生方法论课程质量评价体系构建中的应用[J].黑龙江高教研究,2021,39(9):105-110. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2614.2021.09.016.
[17] 李雪, 黄国琼, 梅文, 等. 医学慕课教学设计规范体系构建研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2020,40(6):421-425. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20191211-01069.
[18] 刘伟, 谭维智. 人工智能时代的师生交互:困顿与突破[J].开放教育研究,2022,28(2):54-63. DOI: 10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2022.02.006.
[19] 夏昉, 葛楠, 刘金萍, 等. 基于结构方程模型的吉林省医学院校大学生慕课满意度状况研究[J].医学与社会,2020,33(12):124-129. DOI: 10.13723/j.yxysh.2020.12.025.
[20] 李斐,黄明东.“慕课”带给高校的机遇与挑战[J].中国高等教育,2014(7):22-26.