Development and reliability and validity analysis of online learning motivation scale for medical students

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220319-00344

Chinese Journal of Medical Education ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 942-946.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220319-00344

Development and reliability and validity analysis of online learning motivation scale for medical students

Guo Haichen¹, Yang Maoling², Gao Rui³, Li Qinglin³, Zhang Shue³, Yuan Jia³, Wang Yanping³, Li Shuhui³, Wang Guanjun³, Zhang Zhong³, Yang Libin⁴

¹Outpatient Department Office, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China;
²Ministry of Maternal and Child Health Management, Sichuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China;
³Department of Medical Education Management, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China;
⁴College of International Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China

Received:2022-03-19 Online:2022-10-01 Published:2022-09-29
Contact: Yang Libin, Email: yanglib@126.com

Abstract

Abstract: Objective The online learning motivation scale for medical students was developed and its reliability and validity were tested. Methods From June 6 to 14, 2021, a panel discussion method was used to determine the scale of the medical students' motivation for online learning scale. A total of 1 082 medical students enrolled in Harbin Medical University and Jiamusi University were selected by whole-group sampling and stratified sampling to conduct the general situation questionnaire and the medical students' motivation for online learning scale. The reliability and validity of the medical students' online learning motivation scale were analyzed. Results The online learning motivation scale for medical students contains 6 dimensions of external influence, career development, freedom from routine, social service, competence pursuit, and interest in knowledge, with 27 entries. Validation factor analysis showed that the ratio of χ² and degrees of freedom (χ²/DF) was 4.99, the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.06, the goodness of fit index (GFI) was 0.90, the comparative fit quality index (CFI) was 0.95, the normative fit index (NFI) was 0.93, value-added fit index (IFI) was 0.95, non-standard fit index (TLI) was 0.94, and the cronbach coefficient of the scale was 0.95. Conclusions The online learning motivation scale for medical students has good reliability and validity and can be used as a reliable instrument to measure medical students' online learning motivation.

Key words: Students, medical, Online learning motivation scale, Reliability, Validity

CLC Number:

Guo Haichen, Yang Maoling, Gao Rui, Li Qinglin, Zhang Shue, Yuan Jia, Wang Yanping, Li Shuhui, Wang Guanjun, Zhang Zhong, Yang Libin. Development and reliability and validity analysis of online learning motivation scale for medical students[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2022, 42(10): 942-946.

References

[1] 朱桂霖. 大学生网络学习动机激励研究[D].桂林:广西师范大学, 2017.
[2] 杨春, 路海东. 不同形式的评估反馈对大学生的学习动机和学习成绩的影响[J].心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 237-241.
[3] 蔡任栋, 董燕萍.口译学习动机量表的开发与验证[J].外语界, 2017(6): 45-52.
[4] 王警可. 半投射式中学生学习动机量表的初步编制[D].长沙:湖南师范大学, 2013.
[5] Boshier R , Riddell G . Education participation scale factor structure for older adults[J]. Adult Educ Quart, 1978, 28(3):165-175.
[6] 何露露. 成人学习动机的性别比较研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2007.
[7] Strong R, Harder A. Interactionsamong instructional efficacy, motivational orientations, and adult characteristics on master gardener tenure [J]. J Agric Educ Ext, 2011, 52(4): 65-75.
[8] 王改花,傅钢善.网络环境下学习者特征模型的构建及量表的研制[J].远程教育杂志,2018,36(3):64-74. DOI:10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2018.03.007.
[9] 吴峰, 王辞晓, 李杰. 非约束条件下成人在线学习动机量表编制[J].现代远程教育研究, 2015, (4): 60-65. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-5195.2015.04.007.
[10] 王迎, 安玉洁, 黄荣怀. 远程学习者特征模型的构建研究[J].开放教育研究, 2006, 12(1):7.
[11] 国秀玮. 成人学习动机和学习满意度的研究[D].上海:华东师范大学, 2007.
[12] 侯小娜. 师范院校大学生网络通识课程学习动机研究[D].太原:山西师范大学, 2017.
[13] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010: 1.
[14] 李玥, 张丁丁, 佟元任, 等.临床和转化医学研究导师胜任力评价量表的汉化和信效度分析[J].中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(5): 472-476. DOI: 103760/cma.j.cn115259-20200623-00951.
[15] Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors[J]. Multivariate Behav Res, 1966,1(2):245-276. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
[16] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型: AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2017: 11.
[17] 林丽萍, 刘伟霞, 林中燕. 基于PLS-SEM的互联网人群生存质量量表的信度效度评价[J].中国卫生统计, 2020, 37(6): 866-869. DOI:10. 3969 /j. issn. 1002-3674. 2020. 06. 017.
[18] Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. J Marketing Res, 1981, 18(1) : 39-50. DOI: 10.1177/002224378101800104.

Development and reliability and validity analysis of online learning motivation scale for medical students

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 10

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	You Mei, Xu Meihong. Construction of a core competence evaluation index for speciality of nutrition and food hygiene [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2022, 42(7): 581-585.
[2]	Wang Yujie, Zhang Lichuan, Yin Qian, Pang Dong, Lu Qian. Development and reliability and validity test of the nurse core competencies scale based on the WHO framework [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2022, 42(10): 938-941.
[3]	Li Yue, Zhang Dingding, Tong Yuanren, Wei Yizhen, Zhu Huijuan, Liu Jihai, Luo Linzhi, Zhang Shuyang. Reliability and validity of the mandarin version of mentor competency assessment [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2021, 41(5): 472-476.
[4]	Liu Chang, Dong Yue, Zhang Zixun, Hu Chang, Peng Zhiyong. The quality of published survey instruments used in medical education research in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2020, 40(9): 721-725.
[5]	Liang Haifei, Pan Guichang, Gong Jianfeng, Ding Weiren, Zhou Haibo. Utilizing the generalizability theory to improve the clinical skills assessment design [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2020, 40(8): 641-644.
[6]	Zhang Chi, Li Xin, Jia Jinzhong, Huang Tianren, Liu Deping. Construction and reliability and validity analysis of satisfaction scale for medical graduates [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2020, 40(4): 316-320.
[7]	Ma Junhong, Wang Jingchao, Zhou Yufei, Liu Hong. Analysis of the results of the second stage clinical comprehensive skills examination of clinical physician certification test by the students from Peking University Health Science Center [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2019, 39(8): 624-629.
[8]	Yu Jie, Wang Jialin, Wang Mingyu, Guo Aimin, Kang Xiaofeng. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Self-Assessment of Clinical Reasoning and Reflection in nursing undergraduates [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2019, 39(7): 539-544.
[9]	Song Wenwen, Shi Lin, Li Honghe, Wen Deliang. The introduction of the Penn State College of Medicine Professionalism Questionnaire and the evaluation on its validity and reliability [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2019, 39(11): 868-871.
[10]	Liu Jiazhen, Lu Yaohong, Zou Yang, Wang Hong, Wang Daozhen, Li ping. Reliability research on the wearable recording equipment applied in the clinical skill evaluation [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2017, 37(6): 952-955.