中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 920-923.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220308-00279

• 留学生教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国—东盟高等医学教育合作意向和需求的调查与分析

白婧, 孙秋丹, 李晓佳   

  1. 北京大学医学部国际合作处,北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-08 出版日期:2022-10-01 发布日期:2022-09-29
  • 通讯作者: 孙秋丹, Email: sunqd@bjmu.edu.cn

Investigation and analysis on collaboration intentions and needs on higher medical education between China and ASEAN countries

Bai Jing, Sun Qiudan, Li Xiaojia   

  1. Office of International Cooperation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2022-03-08 Online:2022-10-01 Published:2022-09-29
  • Contact: Sun Qiudan, Email: sunqd@bjmu.edu.cn

PDF (PC)

37

摘要： 目的 了解中国和东盟院校在医学教育领域合作的意向和需求,促进中国和东盟医学教育的共同发展。方法 2020年5月,采用自制调查问卷对中国—东盟高校医学联盟的43个成员单位在医学教育领域的合作意向、专长与挑战等进行调查。采用描述性统计分析相关数据。结果 20所中国院校和10所东盟院校完成了问卷调查。中国和东盟院校合作意愿较高的领域包括本科生课程设置(中国14所、东盟8所)、科研能力培养(中国17所、东盟7所)和在线课程(中国17所、东盟7所);研究生科研能力培养(中国18所、东盟9所)、研究生交流(中国18所、东盟9所)、短期课程培训/研讨会(中国19所、东盟8所)、在线课程(中国14所、东盟7所);医学生临床观摩/轮转(中国15所、东盟9所)、青年学术会议与研讨会(中国18所、东盟7所)。中国和东盟院校均认为自身在本科生课程设置(中国11所、东盟6所)、研究生短期课程培训/研讨会(中国10所、东盟5所)、临床观摩/轮转(中国10所、东盟5所)方面具备专长。超过一半的中国和东盟院校认为双方合作不存在挑战。结论 中国和东盟院校在医学教育领域的合作意向点较多,双方在在线课程等方面的合作意愿均较强。在部分领域中国或东盟院校的单方合作意愿高,未来应立足双方合作的意向点,进一步挖掘双方在医学教育方面的专长和特色,深化医学教育合作、促进中国和东盟医学教育发展。

关键词: 中国, 东盟, 医学教育, 学生交流, 国际合作

Abstract: Objective The study aims to collect information of collaboration needs on medical education from medical universities/colleges in China and ASEAN and provide suggestions for the development of medical education in China and ASEAN countries. Methods A self-constructed questionnaire survey was adopted to collect data on collaboration intentions, expertise and challenges of the 43 member institutions of China-ASEAN University Consortium on Medicine and Health in medical education in May, 2020. Descriptive statistics was applied for data analysis. Results In total, 20 Chinese members and 10 ASEAN members completed the survey. The study found that both Chinese and ASEAN universities/colleges were particularly interested in cooperation in curriculum design (14 for China, 8 for ASEAN), cultivation of scientific research ability (17 for China, 7 for ASEAN) and online courses (17 for China, 7 for ASEAN) for undergraduate medical education; cultivation of graduate scientific research ability (18 for China, 9 for ASEAN), graduate exchange (18 for China, 9 for ASEAN), short courses training/workshop (19 for China, 8 for ASEAN) and online courses (14 for China, 7 for ASEAN) for postgraduate medical education; clinical observation/rotation (15 for China, 9 for ASEAN), and youth conference & workshop (18 for China, 7 for ASEAN) as to the forms of student exchange. Besides, both Chinese and ASEAN universities/colleges had expertise in curriculum design for undergraduate medical education (11 for China, 6 for ASEAN), short courses training/workshop for postgraduate medical education (10 for China, 5 for ASEAN), and clinical observation/rotation (10 for China, 5 for ASEAN) for student exchange. More than half of Chinese and ASEAN members believed that they had no challenges in cooperation on medical education. Conclusions Both Chinese and ASEAN universities/colleges have a strong willingness to conduct international cooperation in many areas of medical education, including online courses and other aspects. However, in certain areas Chinese or ASEAN institutions have a higher willingness to conduct cooperation than their counterpart. They should further explore their advantages and characteristics of both sides in medical education based on mutual interests, deepen cooperation in medical education and finally promote the development of medical education in the region.

Key words: China, ASEAN, Medical education, Student exchange, International cooperation

中图分类号: