中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 665-669.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20211025-01311

• 继续医学教育 • 上一篇    

浙江省154家医院及其助产人员难产助产技术开展和掌握情况研究

苏畅, 周梦林, 陈丹青   

  1. 浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院产科,杭州 310006
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-25 出版日期:2022-07-01 发布日期:2022-06-29
  • 通讯作者: 陈丹青, Email: chendq@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省教育厅资助项目(Y201941807)

Current situation of the midwifery skills on dystocia among 154 hospitals in Zhejiang Province

Su Chang, Zhou Menglin, Chen Danqing   

  1. Obstetrics Department, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310006, China
  • Received:2021-10-25 Online:2022-07-01 Published:2022-06-29
  • Contact: Chen Danqing, Email: chendq@zju.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Project Funded by Department of Education of Zhejiang Province (Y201941807)

摘要: 目的 了解和分析浙江省各级医院和助产人员对难产助产技术的开展和掌握情况。方法 选取2021年浙江省154家医院在职的1 162名助产人员为研究对象,采用问卷调查方法,收集这些医院及其助产人员难产助产技术的开展和掌握情况相关信息,采用卡方检验比较不同医院对各种助产技术的开展情况。结果 在154家医院当中,不同难产助产技术的总体开展率不同,其中肩难产处理和产钳/胎头吸引是医院常规开展最多的[54.5%(84/154),55.2%(85/154)],而其他技术开展相对较少。三级医院比二级医院在常规开展产钳/胎头吸引[68.0%(51/75)比43.9%(29/66)]、双胎阴道分娩[29.3%(22/75)比7.6%(5/66)]及臀位外倒转[36.0%(27/75)比12.1%(8/66)]难产助产技术的比例高,其差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。在助产人员层面,不同技术的掌握率不一致,但仍有26.7%(310/1 162)的助产人员尚未真正掌握任何一项技术。结论 浙江省医院难产助产技术的开展情况不容乐观,助产人员的难产助产能力有待提升,针对目前的情况,应该更合理地分配资源,强化对三级以下医院的帮扶支持,加强助产人员的规范化培训和实践,并针对不同人群进行个体化指导。

关键词: 妇产科学, 难产助产技术, 规范化培训, 个体化指导, 继续医学教育

Abstract: Objective To investigate and analyze the situation of midwifery skills on dystocia among employees from different hospitals and related medical staff in Zhejiang Province. Methods Totally 1 162 in-service staff from 154 hospitals in Zhejiang Province in 2021 joined the project in 2021. Chi-squared test was used to compare the situation of midwifery skills on dystocia from different hospitals. The results were expected to improve the management capacity on dystocia for midwives in these hospitals. Results Among the 154 hospitals, the overall conducting rates of midwifery skills were different, management of shoulder dystocia and forceps operation/fetal head absorption were most likely to be provided by hospitals [with the proportions as 54.5% (84/154), 55.2% (85/154), respectively], and other skills were less provided; and the conducting rate of three midwifery skills were higher in Level-III hospitals than those in Level-II hospitals, including forceps operation/fetal head absorption[68.0%(51/75) vs. 43.9%(29/66)], vaginal delivery of twins[29.3%(22/75)vs. 7.6%(5/66)] and abdominal version for breech presentation [36.0%(27/75) vs.12.1%(8/66)], the differences of were all significant (P<0.05). As for midwives and obstetricians, the mastery rates of different skills varied. However, 26.7%(310/1 162) of them actually do not master any skills. Conclusions The conducting rates of midwifery skills on dystocia were not satisfying among hospitals in Zhejiang Province, and the managing capacity for dystocia of the midwives and obstetricians needs to be improved, the measures should include reasonable resources allocation, supporting first and second-level hospitals, strengthening the standardized training and clinical practice of midwives based on an individualized strategy for midwives with different training experience.

Key words: Obstetrics, Midwifery skills on dystocia, Standardized training, Individualized guidance, Continuing medical education

中图分类号: