中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 1057-1061.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210714-00885

• 专稿 •    下一篇

医学生全球胜任力指标体系构建的研究

鲁曼1, 刘虹2, 郑志杰3   

  1. 1北京大学医学部教育处教学管理办公室 100191;
    2北京大学医学部教育处 100191;
    3北京大学公共卫生学院全球卫生学系 100191
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-14 发布日期:2021-11-29
  • 通讯作者: 郑志杰, Email: zhengzj@bjmu.edu.cn, 电话: 010-82806537

The development of index system of the global competency for medical students

Lu Man1, Liu Hong2, Zheng Zhijie3   

  1. 1Section of Teaching Management, Education Office, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China;
    2Education Office, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China;
    3Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2021-07-14 Published:2021-11-29
  • Contact: Zheng Zhijie, Email: zhengzj@bjmu.edu.cn, Tel: 0086-10-82806537

PDF (PC)

302

摘要： 目的 探究构建医学生全球胜任力指标体系。方法 通过文献研究和访谈法初步形成了专家函询问卷,采用德尔菲法对33名专家进行2轮专家函询,计算各级指标的重要性赋值。结果 2轮专家函询问卷回收率分别为93.9%(31/33)和100.0%(31/31),专家的权威系数分别为0.82和0.86,专家意见协调系数分别为0.273和0.306,经Kendall协调系数W检验差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。调整与优化后的医学生全球胜任力指标体系包含4个一级指标、11个二级指标和40个三级指标。结论 采用德尔菲法构建的医学生全球胜任力指标体系具有较高的科学性和可靠性,兼顾了国际化和本土化的需求。

关键词: 医学生, 全球化, 全球胜任力, 指标体系, 构建

Abstract: Objective To explore and construct a index system of the global competency for medical students. Methods Through literature research and interview, an expert correspondence questionnaire was created. Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of expert correspondence to 33 experts to calculate the importance assignment of indicators at all levels. Results The recovery rates of the two rounds of expert correspondence questionnaires were 93.9% (31/33) and 100.0% (31/31) respectively, the authority coefficients were 0.82 and 0.86, respectively and the coordination coefficients of expert opinions were 0.273 and 0.306,respectively. The differences were statistically significant as shown by the test of Kendall coefficient of concordance W (all P<0.01). The adjusted and optimized connotation index system of the global competency for medical students includes 4 primary indicators, 11 secondary indicators and 40 tertiary indicators. Conclusions The connotation index system of global competency for medical students constructed by Delphi method has high scientificity and reliability, covers the needs of both internationalization and localization.

Key words: Medical students, Globalization, Global competency, Index system, Development

中图分类号: