中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 788-795.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20241129-01231

• 医学教育评估 • 上一篇    下一篇

护理学专业思政合力育人评价量表的编制

万丽红1, 潘俊豪2, 张琪1, 王晓丹3, 杨朵朵1, 李卓然1   

  1. 1中山大学护理学院基础护理学教研室,广州 510089;
    2中山大学心理学系,广州 510006;
    3中山大学护理学院本科教务办公室,广州 510089
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-29 发布日期:2025-09-28
  • 通讯作者: 万丽红, Email: wanlh@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中华医学会医学教育分会和全国医学教育发展中心2023年医学教育研究立项课题重点立项项目(2023A49)

Development and reliability and validity test of the current situation and effectiveness evaluation scale of integrated ideological and political education in nursing from students' perspective

Wan Lihong1, Pan Junhao2, Zhang Qi1, Wang Xiaodan3, Yang Duoduo1, Li Zhuoran1   

  1. 1Department of Fundamental Nursing, School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510089, China;
    2Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China;
    3Undergraduate Academic Affairs Office, School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510089, China
  • Received:2024-11-29 Published:2025-09-28
  • Contact: Wan Lihong, Email: wanlh@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    The Medical Education Branch of the Chinese Medical Association and the National Medical Education Development Center in 2023 Medical Education Research Key Project(2023A49)

摘要: 目的 编制基于学生视角的护理学专业思政合力育人评价量表。方法 基于背景—输入—过程—成果评价模型和教育生态学理论,采用德尔菲法,于2024年6至7月通过便利抽样法调查我国28个省(自治区、直辖市)1 311名护理学专业应届毕业生,编制护理学专业思政合力育人评价量表,并对其进行信度和效度检验。结果 ①3轮函询专家的积极系数分别为100.0%、100.0%和95.0%,专家权威系数为0.908;第三轮函询的条目重要性评分为4.26~5.00分,满分率为36.8%~100.0%,变异系数为0~0.17,肯德尔和谐系数为0.155(P<0.001)。②条目水平内容效度为0.95~1.00,量表水平的内容效度为0.95。③验证性因子分析模型的卡方自由度比为2.75,比较拟合指数(CFI)为0.952,Tucker-Lewis指数(TLI)为0.949,标准化残差均方根(SRMR)为0.032,平均平方误差平方根(RMSEA)为0.037,组合信度(CR)为0.738~0.934,平均方差萃取量(AVE)为0.779~0.969。④量表的克朗巴赫系数为0.990,折半信度系数为0.963,重测信度系数为0.797。编成的量表包括9个维度和44个条目。结论 基于学生视角的护理学专业思政合力育人的现状与成效评价量表具有良好的信度和效度,可作为客观评价护理学专业思政合力育人质量的可靠工具。

关键词: 护理学, 专业, 思政教育, 合力育人, 成效评价, 量表

Abstract: Objective To develop the current situation and effectiveness evaluation of integrated ideological and political education (CSEE-IIPE) Scale in nursing from students' perspective.Methods Based on the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model and education ecology theory as the theoretical framework, the initial version of CSEE-IIPE was developed through Delphi expert consultation. From June to July 2024, 1 311 fresh graduates in nursing in 28 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) were surveyed using the convenience sampling method.Results The positive coefficients of consultation with experts was 100.0%, 100.0% and 95.0%; the expert authority coefficient was 0.908. The mean importance scores of items were 4.26~5.00,and the full score ratios were 36.8%~100.0%, the coefficients of variation were 0~0.17, the Kendall's coefficient of harmony was 0.155 (P<0.001). The content validity indexes of item level were 0.95~1.00, and the content validity index of scale level was 0.95. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fit indexes were χ2/df=2.75,CFI=0.952,TLI=0.949,SRMR=0.032,RMSEA=0.037,CR=0.738~0.934,AVE=0.779~0.969,indicating a good fit. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the CSEE-IIPE Scale was 0.990; the split half reliability was 0.963; the retest reliability was 0.797. The CSEE-IIPE Scale included 44 items in 9 dimensions.Conclusions The CSEE-IIPE Scale in nursing from students' perspective has good reliability and validity. It can be used as a reliable tool to objectively evaluate the quality of integrated ideological and political education in nursing major.

Key words: Nursing, Specialties, Ideological and political education, Integrated education system, Effectiveness evaluation, Scale

中图分类号: