医学教育研究中的定量和定性研究方法

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.02.001

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 81-92.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.02.001

• 专稿 • 下一篇

医学教育研究中的定量和定性研究方法

吴红斌¹, 王维民²

¹北京大学医学教育研究所/全国医学教育发展中心 100191;
²北京大学医学部/全国医学教育发展中心 100191

收稿日期:2018-08-16 出版日期:2019-02-01 发布日期:2020-12-08
通讯作者: 王维民, Email: wwm@bjmu.edu.cn, 电话: 010-82801264
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(71804005);北京大学医学部学科建设项目(BMU2017YB005)

Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research

Wu Hongbin¹, Wang Weimin²

¹Institute of Medical Education/National Center of Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China;
²Peking University Health Science Center/National Center of Health Professions Education Development, Beijing 100191, China

Received:2018-08-16 Online:2019-02-01 Published:2020-12-08
Contact: Wang Weimin, Email: wwm@bjmu.edu.cn, Tel: 0086-10-82801264
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars (71804005); Discipline Construction Project of Peking University Health Science Center (BMU2017YB005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 医学教育改革与发展的推进需要高水平的医学教育研究作为支撑。本文介绍了2014年在Medical Teacher上发表,并作为欧洲医学教育委员会提供给医学教育工作者作为实践指南的2篇医学教育研究方法的论文,其目的在于为我国医学教育领域的研究者、管理者和教师提供参考,以便使之理解医学教育研究方法的特点,明白医学教育研究中定量研究和定性研究方法在提供医学教育证据上的不同贡献,便于根据所研究的问题选择合适的医学教育研究方法,更加科学和规范地开展医学教育研究。本文的主体部分包括研究范式、研究过程、定量研究设计、定性研究设计、研究对象与样本选择、数据收集与分析等6个部分,期望能够对开展医学教育研究有所参考和借鉴。

关键词: 医学教育, 研究方法, 定量研究, 定性研究

Abstract: The reform and development of medical education should be supported by high-level medical education research. This paper reviews and introduces two research papers about the methods in medical education, which are published in the journal of medical teacher and these two papers have been regarded as the AMEE Guide. The purpose of this paper is to provide medical educators in China, especially those who are interested in and new to medical education research, with some references and a basic understanding of the methods of medical education research. Also, helps them to understand that how quantitative and qualitative methods contribute to the medical education evidence through different approaches and how to select the most appropriate approach according to the research questions. The main body of this paper includes six parts: research paradigm, research process, quantitative research design, qualitative research design, research object and sampling procedures, data collection and analysis. We thinks that the above six parts are of great reference and guiding significance for medical education research in China.

Key words: Medical education, Research methods, Quantitative research, Qualitative research

中图分类号:

R-05

吴红斌, 王维民. 医学教育研究中的定量和定性研究方法[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2019, 39(2): 81-92.

Wu Hongbin, Wang Weimin. Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2019, 39(2): 81-92.

参考文献

[1] 殷晓丽,郭立,门寒隽,等.我国医学教育研究的现状及反思——基于5本主要医学教育学术刊物2007年刊载论文的分析[J].复旦教育论坛,2011,9(1):87-91.
[2] Tavakol M, Sandars J. Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: AMEE Guide No 90: Part I[J].Medical Teacher,2014,36(9):746-756.DOI: 10.3109/0142159x.2014.915298
[3] Tavakol M, Sandars J.Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: AMEE Guide No 90: Part II[J].Medical Teacher,2014,36(10):838-848. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2014.915297.
[4] Norman G. Research in medical education: Three decades of progress[J].BMJ, 2002,324(7353):1560-1562.DOI:10.1136/bmj.324.7353.1560.
[5] Tavakol M, Torabi GS. Using evaluation research to improve medical education. [J].Clinical Teacher,2010,7(3):192-196.DOI:10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00383.x.
[6] Guba E.The paradigm dialoge[M].London: Sage Publication,1990:15-27.
[7] Denzin N, Lincoln Y. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research[M].Thousands Oaks: SAGE,2011:1-19.
[8] Griffin K, Museus SD. Application of mixed-methods approaches to higher education and intersectional analyses[J].New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(151):15-26.DOI:10.1002/ir.396.
[9] Liehr P, Smith M. Nursing research: Methods, critical appraisal and utilization [M].St.Louis: Mosby,2002:107-120.
[10] Morse J, Field P. Qualitative research methods for health professionals[M]. Thousand Oaks:SAGE,1995:43.
[11] Burlington BS. Evidence-based nursing: The research-practice connection[J].3^rd edition. Critical Care Nurse,2013,33(4):83-83.
[12] Brown C. Research methods for pharmaceutical practice and policy[M].London:Pharmaceutical Press.2010:17-35.
[13] Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches[M].Thousands Okas:SAGE,2003:103.
[14] Lodico M, Spaulding D, Voegtle K. Methods in educational research: From theory to practice[M].San Faransico: John Wiley & Sons,2010:440.
[15] Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education[M].London: Routledge,2008:10-12.
[16] Khatami S, Macentee MI, Pratt DD, et al. Clinical reasoning in dentistry: A conceptual framework for dental education[J].Journal of Dental Education,2012, 76(9):1116-1128.DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8191.2012.01496.x.
[17] Tavakol S, Dennick R, Tavakol M. Medical students' understanding of empathy: A phenomenological study[J].Medical Education,2012,46(7):306-316.DOI:10. 1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04152.x.
[18] Holloway I, Biley FC. Being a qualitative researcher[J].Qual Health Res,2011, 21(7):968-975.DOI:10.1177/1049732310395607.
[19] Ashley P, Boyd B. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to research in environmental management[J].Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 2006,13(2):70-78.DOI:10.1080/14486563.2006.10648674.
[20] Taylor B. Qualitative research in the health sciences: Methodologies, methods and processes[M].New York:Routledge,2013:162-176.
[21] Henderson R. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook[J].Studies in Continuing Education,2011,33(3):372-374.DOI:10.1080/0158037X.2011.609670.
[22] Aveyard H. Doing a literature review in health and social care: A practical guide[J]. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling,2010,43(1):180-182.DOI: 10.1080/03069885.2014.975101.
[23] Sclater M. Applying theory to educational research: An introductory approaches with case studies[M].Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell,2012:157-176.
[24] Reeves S, Kuper A, Hodges BD. Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography [J].BMJ,2008,337(7668):512-514.DOI:10.1136/bmj.a1020.
[25] Levin KA. Study design III: Cross-sectional studies[J].Evid Based Dent,2006, 7(1):24-25.DOI:10.1038/sj.ebd.6400375.
[26] Goldstein H. Longitudinal studies and the measurement of change[J].Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,1968,18(2):93-117.DOI:10.2307/2986775.
[27] Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, et al. The devil is in the third year: A longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school[J].Acad Med,2009, 84(9):1182-1191.DOI:10.1038/35044120.
[28] Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice[J].Nurse Education Today,2015,23(6):467-467.DOI:10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00079-0.
[29] Atkinson P, Pugsley L. Making sense of ethnography and medical education[J]. Medical Education,2010,39(2):228-234.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02070.x.
[30] Stern PN. Grounded Theory Methodology: Its uses and processes[J].Image,2010, 12(1):20-23.DOI:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1980.tb01455.x.
[31] Dickson GL, Flynn L. Nurses' clinical reasoning: Processes and practices of medication safety[J].Qual Health Res,2012,22(1):3-16.DOI:10.1177/1049732311 420448.
[32] Levy P, Lemeshow S. Sampling of populations: Methods and applications[M]. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Son,2008:10-16.
[33] Starks H, Trinidad SB. Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory[J].Qual Health Res,2007,17(10):1372-1380.DOI:10.1177/10
49732307307031.
[34] Edwards P. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: Systematic review[J].BMJ British Medical Journal,2002,324(7347):1183-1185.DOI:10.1136/ bmj.324.7347.1183.
[35] Britten, Nicky. Qualitative research: Qualitative interviews in medical research[J].BMJ,1995,311(6999):251-253.DOI:10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251.
[36] Schutt RK. Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research [M].Thousand Oaks:SAGE,2006:124-130.

医学教育研究中的定量和定性研究方法

Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘畅, 董越, 张子旬, 胡畅, 彭志勇. 我国医学教育期刊论文中部分问卷调查的质量分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(9): 721-725.
[2]	张进, 杨立斌, 郭庆峰, 曹德品. 形成性评价在本科临床医学教育中的应用研究综述[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(9): 731-735.
[3]	李鸿鹤, David A Hirsh, Tara A Singh, Yamini Saravanan, Rachel Hathaway, Bianca Shagrin, Elizabeth Gaufberg, Arundhati Ghosh, 刘君, 李扬龄, 闻德亮. 发达国家纵向整合临床实习模式的发展及其对我国医学教育的启示[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(9): 748-698.
[4]	吴雪霁, 汪慧, 张玉华, 毛及, 刘玉清, 景钦隆, 罗雷, 张周斌. 基于微信的新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情基层防控继续教育平台的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(8): 610-614.
[5]	唐琳, 归航. 由美国医学教育改革展望“目标驱动”的医学教育课程创新体系[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(8): 649-653.
[6]	丁蕾, 邵莉, 王慧, 唐华, 杨静, 郭晓奎, 胡翊群. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下医学人才培养的思考[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(7): 481-485.
[7]	叶青, 杨劲, 成于珈, 董卫国. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下加强医院感染教育的思考[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(7): 490-494.
[8]	吴红斌, 谢阿娜, 王维民. 我国八年制医学教育的回顾与展望[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(7): 513-518.
[9]	新时代医学教育发展与改革专家组. 专家共识:改革医学教育,为健康中国2030保驾护航[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(6): 401-404.
[10]	孙宝志. 医学教育质量文化建设中存在的问题分析与对策[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(6): 405-408.
[11]	王征, 张帆, 刘慧琳. 基于文献计量学的老年医学教育研究现状和热点分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(5): 329-333.
[12]	李崎, 方利群, 左云霞, 朱涛, 刘进. 模拟医学教育师资存在的问题与应对策略[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(5): 354-357.
[13]	王维民, 文历阳. 致敬医学精神做好顶层设计服务全民健康[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(4): 241-247.
[14]	陈漫, 肖飞, 黎子华, 郑少燕, 辛岗. 医学教育纵向研究数据库构建研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(3): 161-164.
[15]	吴越, 翟双庆, 袁娜, 杨芳, 王小璇, 焦楠. 我国医学教育研究热点与发展趋势分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(11): 853-857.