中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 82-85.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.01.019

• 教育技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

心肺复苏质量反馈装置除颤监护仪在精准心肺复苏技能教学中的应用

廖瑾莉, 徐嘉, 詹红, 祝锋, 张婉婉, 曾庆理, 熊艳   

  1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-18 发布日期:2020-12-08
  • 通讯作者: 熊艳,Email：way1111@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科学技术研究基金(B2014110); 广东省科技计划项目(2014A020212150)

Training effectiveness improvements of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills by using monitor/defibrillator with quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (Q-CPR) feedback in undergraduate medical students

Liao Jinli, Xu Jia, Zhan Hong, Zhu Feng, Zhang Wanwan, Zeng Qingli, Xiong Yan   

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, SUN Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2017-03-18 Published:2020-12-08
  • Contact: Xiong Yan, Email: way1111@126.com
  • Supported by:
    Medical Science and Technology Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (B2014110); Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangdong Province (2014A020212150)

PDF (PC)

16

摘要： 目的 评价应用带心肺复苏质量(Q-CPR)反馈装置除颤监护仪培训医学生精准心肺复苏技能的成效。方法 以中山大学2011级八年制临床医学专业72名学生为研究对象。将其分为两组,实验组32名学生和对照组40名学生。对实验组学生采用Q-CPR反馈装置除颤监护仪进行心肺复苏培训,对照组采用常规方法培训。比较两组培训前后理论测试、操作技能考核成绩并采用教学效果评价调查表评估教学满意度。结果 两组学生培训后,实验组学生对培训效果的主观评价满意度较对照组高;两组学生的心肺复苏按压、通气及电除颤质量较培训前成绩明显提高,且实验组按压质量较对照组好,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 带心肺复苏质量反馈装置除颤监护仪有望成为医学教育中提高心肺复苏培训成效的有益工具。

关键词: 心肺复苏质量反馈, 心肺复苏术, 医学生, 培训效果

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the training effectiveness improvements of CPR skills by using monitor/defibrillator with Q-CPR (quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation) feedback in undergraduate medical students. Methods Seventy-two medical students in the emergency department were enrolled in this study. Thirty-two students were trained by using monitor/defibrillator with Q-CPR feedback and assigned into experimental group,whereas the other 40 students were assigned into control group and trained with traditional lecture and demonstrating. Knowledge test,skill performance and evaluation of teaching effect evaluation questionnaire of the course were applied to evaluate the training effectiveness. Results Scores of skill performance and personal satisfaction assessment in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group; Quality evaluation in chest compression,ventilation and defibrillation was improved in both groups,whereas performance improvement in chest compression in experimental group was significantly better than that in control groups. Conclusions Monitor/defibrillator with Q-CPR feedback may be applied as a useful tool to improve basic life support skills in CPR training for medical students.

Key words: Monitor/defibrillator with Q-CPR feedback, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills, Undergraduate education, Training effectiveness