中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 153-157.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.01.033

• 国外医学与比较医学教育 • 上一篇    

国内外妇产科学教育研究主题及方法的对比分析

刘颖, 张燕蕾, 张大庆   

  1. 100191 北京大学医学图书馆综合业务办公室(刘颖、张燕蕾),医学人文研究院(张大庆)
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-07 发布日期:2020-12-08
  • 通讯作者: 张燕蕾,Email:zhangyanlei@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学医学部2014年度教育教学研究课题(2014012301)

A comparative study on research themes and methods of obstetrics and gynecology education

Liu Ying, Zhang Yanlei, Zhang Daqing   

  1. Administrative Office, Health Science Library, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China (Liu Y, Zhang YL); Institute of Medical Humanities, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China (Zhang DQ)
  • Received:2017-09-07 Published:2020-12-08
  • Contact: Zhang Yanlei, Email: zhangyanlei@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Peking University Health Science Center Medical Education Program (2014012301)

摘要: 目的 系统阐述近十年国内外妇产科学教育研究的主题和方法,为国内相关研究提供参考。方法 以文献计量和内容分析的方式,对国内外2007年至2016年妇产科学教育研究文献进行分析。结果 国内妇产科学教育研究主题较分散且不够深入,研究热点过于集中,研究方法较单一,多为定量分析,质性研究缺乏。结论 国外妇产科学教育研究有可借鉴之处,在借鉴国外的理论方法时,还需注意结合本土的情况,进行创新性探索。

关键词: 妇产科学, 医学教育, 研究主题, 研究方法

Abstract: Objective To expound the theme and methods in obstetrics and gynecology education research in China and abroad in the past decade, and provide reference for domestic related research. Methods Papers published from 2007 to 2016 were analyzed using methods of bibliometric and content analysis. Results The results show that: the themes in China are scattered and not deep enough, and research focus is too concentrated. The methods of research are unitary. In other words, most of them are quantitative analysis, but qualitative research is lack. Conclusions The theme and method abroad are available for reference, and we need to pay attention to local conditions and innovative exploration.

Key words: Obstetrics and gynecology, Medical education, Research theme, Research methods