中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 733-736.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.05.021

• 研究生教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

临床医学硕士专业学位研究生职业胜任力评价方法研究

胥娇, 王志博, 董靖竹, 薄红   

  1. 150001 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院继续教育部(胥娇、董靖竹、薄红);
    150040 哈尔滨,黑龙江中医药大学人文与管理学院管理学教研室(王志博)
  • 出版日期:2017-05-01 发布日期:2020-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 薄红, Email:bohong2247@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中华医学会医学教育分会和中国高等教育学会医学教育专业委员会2016年医学教育研究立项课题(2016B-YJS022)

Research on evaluation methods of professional competency for standardized training of clinical medical professional degree postgraduates

Xu Jiao, Wang Zhibo, Dong Jingzhu, Bo Hong   

  1. Department of Continuing Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China(Xu J, Dong JZ, Bo H);
    Department of Management, Humanities and Management College, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150040, China(Wang ZB )
  • Online:2017-05-01 Published:2020-12-09
  • Contact: Bo Hong, Email:bohong2247@163.com

摘要: 目的 根据临床医学硕士专业学位研究生规范化培训要求,建立一套综合的、客观的、适宜的职业胜任力评价方法,为完善规范化培训提供建议。方法 综合运用文献分析法、专题讨论法及专家咨询法,对临床医学硕士专业学位研究生职业胜任力评价方法进行探讨,对数据进行统计分析。结果 职业胜任力评价应遵循定性与定量、主观与客观相结合的原则;评价主体以导师为主、多方参与;评价内容涉及基准性胜任力和鉴别性胜任力两大体系;评价方式坚持考核与考试评价相结合;评价体系体现了评价功能、导向功能与借鉴功能,适用于研究生培养的各个领域。结论 职业胜任力评价方法可为临床医学硕士专业学位研究生规范化培训提供参考依据。

关键词: 临床医学, 专业学位研究生, 职业胜任力, 规范化培训, 评价方法

Abstract: Objective To construct a set of comprehensive, objective, suitable professional competency evaluation method, which providing advices on the improvement the professional competency of professional degree graduate students to meet the request of standardized training for postgraduates.Methods The literature analysis, panel discussion and expert consultation were used to explore the evaluation method of professional competency, and then the data were analyzed.Results The evaluation of professional competency for clinical medical professional degree postgraduates should adhere to principles of combining qualitative and quantitative, subjective andObjective as well. The main body of evaluation should be tutors, and other parts should participate as well. The content of the evaluation involves the benchmark competency and the identify competency. Evaluation methods should adhere to the combination of assessment and examination evaluation, and the evaluation results can be widely used in every field of graduate education.Conclusions Evaluation methods of professional competency for clinical medical professional degree postgraduates were essential, and can provide reference for standardized training for clinical medical students.

Key words: Clinical medicine, Professional degree postgraduates, Professional competency, Standardized training, Evaluation method