中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 626-629.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.04.032

• 医学教育评估 • 上一篇    下一篇

五年制临床医学专业学生儿科学考试试卷分析的实践研究

温宇, 张艾, 陈瑜, 周建华, 罗小平   

  1. 430030 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院儿科学教研室
  • 出版日期:2017-04-01 发布日期:2020-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 陈瑜, Email:1030756510@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    2016年湖北省教育厅高等学校教学研究项目(2016040); 2016年华中科技大学教学研究项目(20); 2016年华中科技大学第二临床学院教学研究项目(4)

Practical study on analysis and evaluation of the final examination paper and score on pediatrics for students majoring in clinical medicine

Wen Yu, Zhang Ai, Chen Yu, Zhou Jianhua, Luo Xiaoping   

  1. Teaching and Research Section of Pediatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030,China
  • Online:2017-04-01 Published:2020-12-09
  • Contact: Chen Yu, Email:1030756510@qq.com

PDF (PC)

12

摘要： 目的 通过对华中科技大学2012级五年制临床医学专业学生儿科学考试成绩的综合分析,发现教学过程中的薄弱环节和存在问题,提出改进措施,提高教学质量。方法 对华中科技大学同济医学院第二临床学院2012级五年制临床医学专业二大班学生的115 份儿科学考试试卷和学生成绩进行量化统计分析。结果 考试成绩呈偏态分布,平均成绩为(63.7±13.1)分,选择题、名词解释题、简答题和病例分析题平均难度系数(P)分别为0.71、0.53、0.58和0.56,其中难度系数小于0.4的有9题(共16分);区分度(D)分别为0.28、0.36、0.40和0.36,其中区分度小于0.2的有17道题(共18分)。Cronbach's α信度系数为0.87。结论 试卷题型分配比较全面,试题总体难度适中,区分度良好,信度高,基本反映了学生对儿科学知识点的掌握程度。试卷质量分析有助于评估考试的公平性,有助于促进学科试题库的更新,有助于发现教学的薄弱环节,有助于引发教学工作者的反思,对于提高教学质量具有积极的促进作用。

关键词: 儿科学, 试卷分析, 成绩分析, 教学评价

Abstract: Objective To analyze and evaluate the final examination papers on Pediatrics in our 2012 grade undergraduates specializing in clinical medicine. Find out the teaching problems and bring forward some countermeasures to improve the effects and qualities of pediatric teaching.Methods Excel 2007 and SPSS 19.0 were used to analyze the examination paper and score of Pediatrics for 115 students.Results The distribution of the scores shows skew distribution, with the mean score being 63.7, the standard deviation 13.1, and the paper reliability was 0.87. The degree of difficulty (P value) of single-choice question, noun explanation, short-answer, question and clinical case analysis was 0.71, 0.53, 0.58 and 0.56, respectively. The discrimination of single-choice question, noun explanation, short-answer, question and clinical case analysis was 0.28, 0.36, 0.40 and 0.36, respectively.Conclusions The results show that the examination paper was reliable with comprehensive test items, moderate difficulty and reasonable score distribution. The analysis was helpful to assess the fairness of the exam and revealed some problems of the students and teaching. It provides some experience on how to upgrade the level of test paper preparation and helps to trigger the reflection of teaching workers. What is more, it plays a great role in improving the teaching quality.

Key words: Pediatrics, Examination paper analysis, Score analysis, Teaching evaluation