Chinese Journal of Medical Education ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 601-605.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210114-00070

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of ultrasound simulator in assessing residents' skill of obstetric ultrasound scanning

Zhao Yongfeng1, Tang Xiaohong2, Peng Hong1, Liu Wengang1, Li Linlu1, Yuan Le2, Zhou Ping1   

  1. 1Department of Ultrasound, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China;
    2Clinical Skill Center, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
  • Received:2021-01-14 Online:2021-07-01 Published:2021-06-29
  • Contact: Zhou Ping, Email: zhouping1000@hotmail.com, Tel: 0086-731-88618403
  • Supported by:
    National Medical Examinations Centre Empirical Research Project (20190066)

Abstract: Objective To explore the feasibility of introducing ultrasound simulator test in assessing residents' obstetric ultrasound scanning skills. Methods An experimental comparative method was used in this study. In September 2019, 30 residents in the Department of Ultrasound of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University were included in the study as examinees. They completed two runs of obstetric ultrasound scan skill assessments on volunteer pregnant women and on ultrasound simulator (P1, S1, S2, P2), respectively. The scores in volunteer pregnant women tests and simulator tests were compared, and the correlation between scores recorded in volunteer pregnant women tests and simulator tests was analyzed. The difficulty and differentiation degrees of tests were observed. The inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Scores from volunteer pregnant women test were P1= (50.39±9.71), P2= (53.39±10.63) and the scores from simulator test were S1= (54.41±9.52), S2= (57.51±9.76). Scores in S1 were higher than that of P1, and scores in S2 were higher than that of P2 (P<0.01). A positive correlation between the two sets of scores was found (r=0.784, P<0.01). The difficulty degrees of simulator test and volunteer pregnant women test were PS1=0.54, PS2=0.58, PP1=0.50, PP2=0.53 respectively and the differentiation degrees of simulator test and volunteer pregnant women test were DS1=0.67, DS2=0.65, DP1=0.70, DP2=0.72 respectively. The inter-rater reliability of simulator test and volunteer pregnant women test was high (simulator test: ICC=0.838, P<0.01;volunteer pregnant women test: ICC=0.762, P<0.01). The test-retest reliability of simulator test and volunteer pregnant women test was high (simulator test: ICC=0.878, P<0.01;volunteer pregnant women test: ICC=0.760, P<0.01). Conclusions Although there are differences between scores recorded in simulator test and volunteer pregnant women test, the simulator test is highly correlated with volunteer pregnant women test. The difficulty degree of simulator test is medium, the differentiation degree is high, and the reliability is high. Simulator test is expected to be an alternative to the test with volunteer pregnant women in assessing residents' skill of obstetric ultrasound scanning.

Key words: Simulator, Obstetric ultrasound scanning, Skill assessment, Residents

CLC Number: