中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 696-700.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.09.012

• 研究生教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同培养类型临床医学硕士研究生学位论文盲评结果分析

李一峰, 李念念, 叶韧, 赵嘉芸   

  1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院科研处研究生管理科,合肥 230022
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-04 出版日期:2019-09-01 发布日期:2020-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 赵嘉芸,Email:790730435@qq.com,电话:0551-62923665
  • 基金资助:
    安徽医科大学国际学生教育管理委托性项目(9021283101)

Analysis of blind evaluation results of master's degree thesis of clinical medicine in different culture types

Li Yifeng, Li Niannian, Ye Ren, Zhao Jiayun   

  1. Graduate Management Section,Scientific Research Department,the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230022,China
  • Received:2018-12-04 Online:2019-09-01 Published:2020-12-09
  • Contact: Zhao Jiayun,Email:790730435@qq.com,Tel:0086-551-62923665

PDF (PC)

15

摘要： 目的 了解实行临床医学专业学位硕士研究生“四证合一”培养模式后,学术型和专业型2种培养类型硕士研究生学位论文的盲评结果,分析学位论文存在的问题与不足,探讨改进的措施与对策。方法 采用资料分析方法,选择安徽医科大学第一附属医院2015级304名临床医学硕士研究生的学位论文为研究资料,采用SPSS21.0软件,按照学术型和专业型2种培养类型对学位论文的盲评结果进行对比分析。结果 通过秩和检验,学术型硕士研究生和专业型硕士研究生的学位论文总体评价秩均值分别为169.87、142.22(Z=2.86,P<0.01)。其中,内科学学术型硕士研究生和专业型硕士研究生的学位论文总体评价秩均值分别为63.92、50.39(Z=2.50,P=0.019),外科学学术型硕士研究生和专业型硕士研究生的学位论文总体评价秩均值分别为59.32、45.32(Z=2.35,P=0.012)。各分项指标中学位论文创新性、论文工作量、科研能力和技术能力、从论文看作者学风、论文选题等5项指标的评阅结果,学术型硕士研究生均优于专业型硕士研究生,两者差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。学位论文8项评价指标与总体评价之间均具有较强的相关性(均P＜0.01)。结论 安徽医科大学第一附属医院学术型硕士研究生的论文质量优于专业型硕士研究生,硕士研究生存在着科研能力不足、创新性不高,论文书写规范性欠缺等问题,应当制定和实施相应的硕士研究生培养和改革措施,提高导师的指导能力,强化研究生科研能力和创新思维的培养,提高研究生的培养质量。

关键词: 临床医学硕士研究生, 学位论文, 评阅结果, 分析

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the results of blind evaluation of academic and professional training master's degree thesis after the implementation of the "unification of four certificates "training model for postgraduates majoring in clinical medicine,and to analyze the existing problems and deficiencies,and to explore improvement measures and countermeasures.Methods The data analysis method was used.A total of 304 master's thesis from 2015 grade of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University was selected as research material with the method of date analyzing.The results of blind evaluation were compared between academic and professional training types with SPSS 21.0 software.Results Through the rank sum test,the overall evaluation rank-average values of academic master's and professional master's degree thesis are 169.87,142.22 (Z=2.86,P<0.01),and the rank-average values of the academic master's and professional master's degree thesis in internal science are 63.92,50.39 (Z=2.50,P=0.019),the rank-average values of the academic master's and professional master's degree thesis in surgery was 59.32,45.32 (Z=2.35,P=0.012).Among the sub-indicators,the results of the thesis innovation,the workload of the thesis,the scientific research ability and the technical ability,the author's academic style,the topic selection of the paper,etc.the academic masters are better than the professional masters (all P<0.05).There are strong correlations between the eight evaluation indicators of the dissertation and the overall evaluation (all P<0.01).Conclusions The quality of the academic master's degree of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University is better than that of the professional master's degree.The postgraduate students have problems such as insufficient scientific research ability,low innovation,and lack of normative writing.The corresponding postgraduate training and reform measures should be formulated to improve the guidance ability of the tutor,strengthen the cultivation of postgraduate research ability and innovative thinking,and improve the quality of postgraduate training.

Key words: Master of clinical medicine, Degree thesis, Evaluation results, Analysis

中图分类号: