中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 819-823.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20221120-01456

• 教学技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字计划系统联合3D打印模板在肿瘤科进修医师穿刺培训中的应用

吉喆, 姜玉良, 孙海涛, 范京红, 邱斌, 李袤, 陈意   

  1. 北京大学第三医院肿瘤放射治疗科,北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-20 出版日期:2023-11-01 发布日期:2023-10-31
  • 通讯作者: 吉喆, Email: aschoff@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学第三医院创新转化基金(BYSYZHKC2021117);国家临床重点专科建设项目(2021)

Application of digital planning system combined with 3D-printing puncture template in puncture training for refresher doctors

Ji Zhe, Jiang Yuliang, Sun Haitao, Fan Jinghong, Qiu Bin, Li Mao, Chen Yi   

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2022-11-20 Online:2023-11-01 Published:2023-10-31
  • Contact: Ji Zhe, Email: aschoff@163.com
  • Supported by:
    The Innovation and Transformation Fund of Peking University Third Hospital (BYSYZHKC2021117); The Special Fund of the National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Program(2021)

摘要: 目的 探讨数字计划系统结合3D打印穿刺模板在进修医师穿刺技术培训中的应用效果。方法 选取2021年12月至2022年6月在北京大学第三医院肿瘤放射治疗科进行进修培训的42名医师为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其平均分为试验组和对照组。试验组采用数字计划系统联合穿刺模板的教学方式,对照组采用传统教学方式。以成绩考核和问卷调查来评价教学效果。采用χ2检验和独立样本t检验统计数据。结果 试验组医师理论知识、阅片能力、临床技能考核成绩均高于对照组[(92.24±2.51)分比(90.33±3.10)分,(92.33±3.34)分比(87.48±4.67)分,(90.95±2.56)分比(85.81±3.70)分],其差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。试验组和对照组医师认为学习难度较大者分别为3人(14.3%)和11人(52.4%);认为达到进修目标者分别为17人(81.0%)和9人(42.9%);在进修结束3个月后开展了穿刺技术者分别为14人(66.7%)和6人(28.6%),其差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论 采用数字计划系统联合3D打印模板的教学方式有助于提高进修医师对理论知识的理解和实践操作的掌握,有助于相关人才的培养。

关键词: 肿瘤科,医院, 计划系统, 3D打印模板, 进修医师, 穿刺

Abstract: Objective To explore the application of digital planning system combined with 3D-printing puncture template in the training of puncture skills for refresher doctors. Methods A total of 42 trainees who received advanced training in the Department of Radiation Oncology of Peking University Third Hospital from December 2021 to June 2022 were selected. They were randomly divided into the study group and the control group. The trainees in the study group used the teaching method of planning system combined with puncture template, while the students in the control group used the traditional teaching method. To evaluate the training outcomes by examination and questionnaire. Data were analyzed by χ2 test and independent sample t test. Results The theoretical knowledge, image reading ability, and clinical skill assessment scores of the physicians in the study group were higher than those in the control group [(92.24±2.51) score compared to (90.33±3.10) score, (92.33±3.34) score compared to (87.48±4.67) score, and (90.95±2.56) score compared to (85.81±3.70) score, respectively]. The differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). In the study group, three physicians (14.3%) believed that the learning difficulty was relatively high, compared to eleven physicians (52.4%) in the control group; furthermore, 17 individuals (81.0%) in the study group and 9 (42.9%) in the control group believed they had achieved their further education goals; after 3 months of further education, 14 individuals (66.7%) in the study group and 6 (28.6%) in the control group underwent puncture techniques. The differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusions The teaching method of planning system combined with 3D printing template is helpful to improve trainees′ understanding of theoretical knowledge and mastering of practice skills, and it is also beneficial for cultivating relevant talents.

Key words: Oncology service,hospital, Planning system, 3D-printing template, Refresher doctor, Puncture

中图分类号: