复盘在国内外护理模拟教育中应用的文献可视化分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240903-00916

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 748-753.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240903-00916

复盘在国内外护理模拟教育中应用的文献可视化分析

刘翠萍¹, 胡娟², 步小龙³, 孙霞⁴

¹山东第一医科大学护理学院妇产科护理学教研室,泰安 271016;
²山东第一医科大学附属省立医院感染性疾病科,济南 250021;
³山东第一医科大学2023级护理学专业研究生,泰安 271016;
⁴山东第一医科大学护理学院麻醉护理与重症监护教研室,泰安 271016

收稿日期:2024-09-03 发布日期:2025-09-28
通讯作者: 孙霞, Email: xiaoyu_801202@126.com
基金资助:
山东第一医科大学教育教学改革研究项目(XZ2022001,XM2022022)

Visual analysis of the application of debriefing in nursing education both in China and in the world

Liu Cuiping¹, Hu Juan², Bu Xiaolong³, Sun Xia⁴

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, School of Nursing, Shandong First Medical University, Taian 271016, China;
²Department of Infectious Diseases, Shandong First Medical University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Jinan 250021, China;
³Master Degree Candidate, Nursing Major, Enrolled in 2023, Shandong First Medical University, Taian 271016, China;
⁴Department of Anesthesia Nursing and Critical Care, School of Nursing, Shandong First Medical University, Taian 271016, China

Received:2024-09-03 Published:2025-09-28
Contact: Sun Xia, Email: xiaoyu_801202@126.com
Supported by:
Shandong First Medical University education and teaching reform research program (XZ2022001, XM2022022)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过分析近20年国内外护理模拟教育中复盘(引导性反馈)的相关文献,梳理该领域的研究现状和发展趋势,为未来的护理教育研究指引方向。方法以科学引文数据库和中国知网等数据库为数据来源,检索自建库至2024年收录的护理模拟教育中复盘的相关文献,应用CiteSpace 软件对其进行可视化分析。结果本研究共纳入英文文献740篇,中文文献41篇,发文量整体呈现波动上升趋势;发文量主要集中在美国;研究热点主要集中在本科护理教育和模拟教学方法等方面;研究前沿主要集中在模拟教学实践标准和教学效果研究等方面。结论复盘逐渐受到国际护理学教育者的关注,但文献质量有待于进一步提高,应通过开展高质量的随机对照试验提升复盘在护理模拟教育应用中的深度和广度。

关键词: 护理学, 复盘, 护理教育, 医学模拟, 可视化分析, 文献计量学

Abstract: Objective To review the current research status and development trends in the field of debriefing in nursing simulation education,by analyzing relevant literature in the field over the past 20 years,so as to provide guidance for future research directions in nursing education. Methods Using data from the Web of Science database and CNKI,we conducted a literature search on debriefing in nursing simulation education from inception to 2024.Visual analysis of these articles was performed using CiteSpace software.Results This study included a total of 740 English articles and 41 Chinese articles,showing an overall increasing trend in publication volume.The majority of publications originated from the United States.The research focus predominantly lies in nursing education and simulation teaching.At the forefront of research are simulation teaching practice standards and studies on teaching effectiveness.Conclusions Debriefing is increasingly capturing the attention of international nursing educators,yet there is room for improvement in the quality of the literature.Enhancing the depth and breadth of debriefing in nursing simulation education can be achieved through conducting rigorous randomized controlled trials.

Key words: Nursing, Debriefing, Nursing education, Medical simulation, Visual analysis, Bibliometrics

中图分类号:

R-05

刘翠萍, 胡娟, 步小龙, 孙霞. 复盘在国内外护理模拟教育中应用的文献可视化分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(10): 748-753.

Liu Cuiping, Hu Juan, Bu Xiaolong, Sun Xia. Visual analysis of the application of debriefing in nursing education both in China and in the world[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2025, 45(10): 748-753.

参考文献

[1] Kim YJ,Yoo JH.The utilization of debriefing for simulation in healthcare: a literature review[J].Nurse Educ Pract,2020,43:102698. DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102698.
[2] Tachakra S, Creagh-Brown B. Using telemedicine for distance education[J]. J Telemed Telecare, 2001,7 Suppl 1:43-44. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X010070S117.
[3] 刘茜.护理模拟教学中应用引导性反馈的研究进展[J].护理学杂志,2015,30(1):96-98. DOI:10.3870/hlxzz.2015.01.097.
[4] Sando CR, Coggins RM, Meakim C, et al. Standards of Best Practice:Simulation Standard VII:participant assessment and evaluation[J].Clinical Simulation in Nursing,2013,9(6):S30-S32. DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.007.
[5] INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: Simulation^SM Participant Evaluation[J]. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 2016, 12: S26-S29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.009.
[6] INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: Simulation^SM Debriefing[J]. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 2016, 12: S21-S25. DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.008.
[7] Levett-Jones T, Lapkin S. A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2014,34(6):e58-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.020.
[8] INACSL Standards Committee, Decker S, Alinier G, et al. Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice^TM the Debriefing Process[J].Clinical Simulation in Nursing,2021,58:27-32.DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.011.
[9] 秦芳,何小凤,史蕾,等.同伴引航式引导性反馈在高仿真情境模拟教学中的应用[J].护理学杂志,2023,38(24):68-71,75.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2023.24.068.
[10] Waznonis AR.Simulation debriefing practices in traditional baccalaureate nursing programs: national survey results[J].Clinical Simulation in Nursing,2015,11(2):110-119. DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2014.10.002.
[11] Clark R, McLean C. The professional and personal debriefing needs of ward based nurses after involvement in a cardiac arrest: an explorative qualitative pilot study[J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2018,47:78-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.03.009.
[12] Neill Mark A,Karen Wotton.High-fidelity simulation debriefing in nursing education: a literature review[J].Clinical Simulation in Nursing,2011,7(5):e161-e168. DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2011.02.001.
[13] Góes F, Jackman D. Development of an instructor guide tool: 'three stages of holistic debriefing'[J]. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, 2020,28:e3229. DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.3089.3229.
[14] Penalo LM. Effects of the virtual simulation prebriefing-debriefing educational strategy on nursing students' self-efficacy and virtual simulation performance:a quasi-experimental study[J].Clinical Simulation in Nursing,2023,82:101431. DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101431.
[15] Koy V, Preechawong S, Yunibhand J, et al. Evaluation of nursing process competencies, nursing quality, and patient safety using virtual simulation with debriefing: a quasi-experimental study[J]. Heliyon, 2023,9(10):e20341. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20341.
[16] 杨冰香,黄润,徐爱京,等.模拟教学引导性反馈的标准和策略[J].中华护理教育,2020,17(1):18-23. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2020.01.003.
[17] Brett-Fleegler M, Rudolph J, Eppich W, et al. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: development and psychometric properties[J]. Simul Healthc, 2012,7(5):288-294. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182620228.
[18] Reed Shelly J. Debriefing Experience Scale:development of a tool to evaluate the student learning experience in debriefing[J].Clinical Simulation in Nursing,2012,8(6):e211-e217. DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2011.11.002.

复盘在国内外护理模拟教育中应用的文献可视化分析

Visual analysis of the application of debriefing in nursing education both in China and in the world

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	魏方泽, 刘骞. 人工智能在外科学教学领域应用现状的文献计量学研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(9): 666-670.
[2]	马丽莉, 杨智蕴, 吕剑虹, 张亚丽, 秦小欢, 张伟英. 基于ARCS学习动机模型的重症护理人文培训课程的构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(8): 588-595.
[3]	金三丽, 韩凤萍, 路潜, 庞冬, 杨萍. 基于屏幕的虚拟模拟在护理学专业小腿骨折情境模拟教学中的应用效果评价[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(8): 616-620.
[4]	许亚红, 安莹, 徐奕旻, 刘溢思, 岳鹏. 护理学专业研究生死亡教育课程建设的探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(7): 481-485.
[5]	丁敏, 刘圣珺, 孙晓靓, 马若琳, 顾浩杰, 单启源, 康宝丽, 徐增光, 徐玮, 陈迟. 医学模拟中心智能信息管理平台建设与应用效果研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(7): 508-513.
[6]	孙玉梅, 周强, 纪璇, 赵国栋. 基于探究共同体的护理学专业混合式课程学习成效及其影响因素研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(6): 408-413.
[7]	曹桂芬, 刘传霞, 方文, 段小妮, 李文. 2003至2023年我国口腔医学研究领域博士学位论文文献计量学分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(5): 384-389.
[8]	张媛媛, 刘婧, 文张, 姜冠潮. 医学模拟教育现状与未来发展[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(4): 241-246.
[9]	厉伟, 田京. 医学模拟中心环境建设要点与现状分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(4): 257-263.
[10]	王芸芸, 杨熙来, 田晓雪, 田旭, 范淑淇, 袁劲松, 沈馨蕊. 本科护理学专业男生职业认同现状的混合研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(2): 91-95.
[11]	王亚栋¹, 刘凤悦¹, 刘铭坤¹, 靳斌¹, 朱民¹, 刘崇忠², 付春莉³, 张元凯⁴, 徐倩倩¹. 我国肝胆外科学教学研究的文献计量学分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(10): 763-767.
[12]	万丽红¹, 潘俊豪², 张琪¹, 王晓丹³, 杨朵朵¹, 李卓然¹. 护理学专业思政合力育人评价量表的编制[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(10): 788-795.
[13]	朱雪梅¹, 苏涵², 高学琴¹, 杜欣¹, 崔岩¹. 基于标准化病人视角对护理学专业学生人文关怀能力评价的混合研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(10): 796-800.
[14]	张巧月, 潘振华, 吴海江, 张勤. 我国临床药学教育研究现状、热点与前沿分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(1): 32-37.
[15]	叶卓俊, 沈艳丽, 江晓, 范抒磊, 冯智英, 孟超, 袁蕙芸. 中英文文献中全科住院医师规范化培训研究热点比较分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025, 45(1): 66-71.