中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 196-200.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2020.03.009

• 研究生教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

医学院校师生对基于学科交叉的研究生培养认知调查

魏瑗1, 石慧峰2, 王青3, 谢家磊2, 王晓莉2, 赵扬玉1   

  1. 1北京大学第三医院妇产科 100191;
    2北京大学公共卫生学院妇幼卫生学系 100191;
    3北京大学研究生院医学部分院 100191
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-25 发布日期:2020-12-10
  • 通讯作者: 王晓莉, Email: xlwang@bjmu.edu.cn, 电话: 010-82801173
  • 基金资助:
    “北大医学交叉研究种子基金”项目(BMU2018MX017、 9930075488);全国医学专业学位研究生教育指导委员会项目(C-YX20190304-01)

A survey on the knowledge and attitude to interdisciplinary-based medical postgraduate training among medical graduate students and tutors

Wei Yuan1, Shi Huifeng2, Wang Qing3, Xie Jialei2, Wang Xiaoli2, Zhao Yangyu1   

  1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China;
    2Department of Maternal and Child Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China;
    3Graduate School of Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2019-09-25 Published:2020-12-10
  • Contact: Wang Xiaoli, Email: xlwang@bjmu.edu.cn, Tel: 0086-10-82801173
  • Supported by:
    Peking University Medical Seed Fund for Interdisciplinary Research (BMU2018MX017; 9930075488); National Medical Professional Degree Graduate Education Steering Committee Research Project (C-YX20190304-01)

PDF (PC)

37

摘要： 目的 了解基于学科交叉的医学研究生培养现状,为培养医学创新人才提供参考。方法 2019年5月,选取北京大学医学研究生430名和指导教师97名为研究对象,采用问卷调查方法,调查其学科合作经历和对基于学科交叉的医学研究生培养的意见和建议。结果 研究生和指导教师分别有47.0% (202/430)和84.5% (82/97)有学科合作经历,认为学科交叉有助于研究生培养的占比分别为98.8% (425/430)和99.0% (96/97);师生与其他学科开展合作的占比为53.9% (284/527),远低于期望合作的占比98.9% (521/527);研究生和指导教师认为限制基于学科交叉研究生培养的前3位原因是缺乏合作交流平台 [ 65.6% (282/430)、71.1% (69/97)]、基于学科交叉研究生培养制度不完善[ 63.3% (272/430)、71.1% (69/97)]和学科交叉培养意识欠缺[ 55.8% (240/430)、52.6% (51/97)]。结论 学科交叉在医学研究生培养中的作用已经得到师生的广泛认可,但仍然需要加强学科合作平台建设,完善人才培养制度和强化学科交叉教育理念,以促进多学科合作和基于学科交叉的医学人才培养。

关键词: 学科交叉, 医学研究生培养, 调查

Abstract: Objective To investigate the current status of interdisciplinary medical postgraduate training, and medical graduate students and tutors' knowledge about and attitude to interdisciplinary-based medical postgraduate training. Methods Using convenient sampling method, an online questionnaire survey was conducted among 430 graduate students and 97 tutors from Peking University Health Science Center to investigate their experience of cooperation with other disciplines, as well as their views on the interdisciplinary-based postgraduate training and suggestions on the improvement of the training model. Results The results showed that 47.0% (202/430) of graduate students and 84.5% (82/97) of tutors reported having the cooperation experience with other disciplines. 98.8% (425/430) of graduate students and 99.0% (96/97) of tutors recognized the benefits of interdisciplinary to medical postgraduate training, including broadening students' knowledge and perspective, sharing resources, improving research methods, and the discovery of scientific problems. The proportion of having a corresponding experience showed that 53.9% (284/527) was much higher than that of expecting interdisciplinary cooperation [98.9% (521/527)] among participants. The first three factors restricting the training reported by the graduate students and tutors were lack of platforms for cooperation and exchange 65.6% (282/430), 71.1% (69/97), imperfect training system 63.3% (272/430), 71.1% (69/97) and insufficient awareness of interdisciplinary-based training 55.8% (240/430), 52.6% (51/97). Conclusions The benefits of interdisciplinary in medical postgraduate training has been widely recognized by students and tutors. However, improving systems and platforms for multi-disciplinary cooperation, and strengthening the interdisciplinary education concept are still needed to promote interdisciplinary integration and medical innovative talents training.

Key words: Interdisciplinary, Medical postgraduate training, Survey

中图分类号: