中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 201-204.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2020.03.010

• 研究生教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

临床医学专业研究生教育质量评价研究现状与问题分析

袁文青1, 宋燕新2, 张爱京1, 霍刚1, 谷士贤1   

  1. 1北京大学第三医院教育处 100191;
    2北京大学第三医院心内科 100191
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-12 发布日期:2020-12-10
  • 通讯作者: 谷士贤, Email: gsxbetty_82@126.com, 电话: 010-82266284
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学医学部教育教学重点课题(2017ZD03)

Current situation and problems of the quality evaluation of postgraduate education in clinical medicine

Yuan Wenqing1, Song Yanxin2, Zhang Aijing1, Huo Gang1, Gu Shixian1   

  1. 1Education Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China;
    2Internal Medicine-Cardiovascular Department,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2019-07-12 Published:2020-12-10
  • Contact: Gu Shixian, Email: gsxbetty_82@126.com, Tel: 0086-10-82266284
  • Supported by:
    Peking University Health Science Center Medical Education Key Program (2017ZD03)

摘要: 本研究通过分析1983年至2017年我国临床医学专业研究生教育质量评价体系研究现状,探究了目前存在的评价对象分层不具体、评价内容不全面、评价指标欠客观等问题,并从临床医学专业研究生培养单位出发,提出评价主体应适当调整、评价对象应具有针对性、评价内容应全面具体、评价指标应客观规范、评价方法应与时俱进等建议。

关键词: 临床医学, 研究生, 质量评价, 现状, 问题

Abstract: By analyzing the current situation of the quality evaluation system of clinical postgraduate education in China from 1983 to 2017, this paper explores the main problems including the current evaluation object stratification, evaluation content is not comprehensive, evaluation index is not objective and evaluation method is relatively backward. From the practical level of clinical medicine postgraduate training unit, it is proposed that the evaluation subject should be properly adjusted, the evaluation object should be targeted, the evaluation content should be comprehensive and specific, the evaluation index should be objective and standardized, and the evaluation method should keep pace with the times.

Key words: Clinical medicine, Postgraduate students, Quality evaluation, Current situation, Problems

中图分类号: