中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 134-138.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.01.029

• 医学教育评估 • 上一篇    下一篇

八年制临床医学专业核医学课程考试成绩和试卷分析的评价与思考

闫平, 王荣福, 张春丽, 范岩, 付占立, 张旭初, 张建华   

  1. 100034 北京大学第一医院核医学科
  • 出版日期:2017-01-01 发布日期:2020-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 闫平, Email:pingyanzheng@126.com

Evaluation and thinking of test scores and examination paper for nuclear medicine course in eight years program students

Yan Ping, Wang Rongfu,Zhang Chunli, Fan Yan, Fu Zhanli, Zhang Xuchu, Zhang Jianhua   

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Online:2017-01-01 Published:2020-12-09
  • Contact: Yan Ping, Email:pingyanzheng@126.com

摘要: 目的 评价在北京大学第一医院见习的北京大学医学部2004级~2008级八年制临床医学专业核医学课程考试成绩与计算机试卷分析结果,为制定科学合理的试卷提供依据。方法 应用SPSS软件对试卷设计和对收集到的5个年级学生的考试成绩按照年级对照方法进行数据处理,并对试卷难度和区分度加以分析和讨论。结果 5个年级学生的核医学考题满分均为50分,考试平均成绩范围37.3分~40.4分,平均及格率为98.1%,考试成绩良好,基本符合正态分布;随着记忆题型减少、客观病例题型的增加与优化,试卷的难度增加;难度系数只有在“适当高”的范围内,区分度才能随之趋向良好。结论 考核应当注意试题的覆盖面,以掌握和应用内容以及病例组合题为主的试卷,才能使试卷的难度“适当高”,区分度良好。

关键词: 核医学, 考试成绩, 试卷分析, 评价与思考

Abstract: Objective To evaluate and reflection the test scores and examination paper of nuclear medicine course examination for 2004~2008 level of eight-year program medical students in Beijing University First Hospital, and to provide more scientific and reasonable exams.Methods According to grade control method, SPSS software was used to deal with the examination paper design and test scores, and analyze test difficulty and discrimination.Results 5 exam grade students average score was between 37.3~40.4 points, full score of 50 points, the average pass rate of 98.1%. The test scores showed a normal distribution. The difficulty of examination papers increased along with memory questions types reduced andObjective questions cases increased and optimized. Only at the range of appropriate high test difficulty the discrimination will tend to be good.Conclusions The course examination should pay attention to the coverage of the examination paper. The test questions would mainly be contained of master, application and case mix in order to make the appropriate high test difficulty and the good discrimination.

Key words: Nuclear medicine, Test scores, Examination paper analysis, Evalation and thinking