中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 622-627.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250806-00900

• 医学教育评估 • 上一篇    下一篇

肾脏病理专科医师置信职业行为指标的构建

蒋镭1, 刘刚1, 郑茜子1, 喻小娟1, 任雅丽2, 王素霞2, 齐心3, 吕继成1, 杨莉1   

  1. 1北京大学第一医院肾内科 北京大学肾脏疾病研究所 卫生部肾脏疾病重点实验室 慢性肾脏病防治教育部重点实验室(北京大学),北京 100034;
    2北京大学第一医院电镜室暨超微病理中心,北京 100034;
    3北京大学第一医院整形烧伤科,北京 100034
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-06 发布日期:2026-07-29
  • 通讯作者: 杨莉, Email: li.yang@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学第一医院教育教学研究课题(2023YJ06);北京大学医学部教育教学改革与研究课题(2025SFZD09)

A study on developing entrustable professional activities for renal pathologists

Jiang Lei1, Liu Gang1, Zheng Xizi1, Yu Xiaojuan1, Ren Yali2, Wang Suxia2, Qi Xin3, Lyu Jicheng1, Yang Li1   

  1. 1Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital &Institute of Nephrology, Peking University &Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China & Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing 100034, China;
    2Laboratory of Electron Microscopy, Pathological Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China;
    3Department of Plastic Surgery &Burns, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2025-08-06 Published:2026-07-29
  • Contact: Yang Li, Email: li.yang@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Peking University First Hospital Medical Education Research Funding Project (2023YJ06); Peking University Health Science Center Educational Reform and Research Projects(2025SFZD09)

摘要: 目的 构建肾脏病理专科医师置信职业行为指标。方法 于2024至2025年基于文献研究法初步拟定置信职业行为指标,采用改良德尔菲法对12名专家进行2轮专家函询和1次专家咨询会,筛选、优化肾脏病理医师置信职业行为指标。结果 共构建了11项肾脏病理医师置信职业行为指标及其内容说明,并确定了各项指标在不同阶段的预期置信级别。专家权威系数为(0.89±0.09),专家积极系数均为100.0%,专家协调系数分别为0.448和0.510。结论 肾脏病理医师置信职业行为指标内容全面、实用,构建过程科学、可靠,可以为肾脏病理专科医师的培养提供简便可行的标准与评价手段。

关键词: 肾脏病学, 肾脏病理专科医师, 置信职业行为, 德尔菲法, 胜任力导向的医学教育

Abstract: Objective To establish specialty-specific Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for renal pathologists. Methods From 2024 to 2025, preliminary EPA indicators were drafted through literature review. A modified Delphi method was employed, involving two rounds of expert consultation and one consultation meeting with 12 specialists to refine the EPA framework. Results Eleven EPA indicators with content descriptions were developed, alongside expected entrustment levels for different training stages. The expert authority coefficient was 0.89±0.09, with 100.0% response rates across consultations. Kendall′s W coefficients for consensus were 0.448 and 0.510, respectively. Conclusions The established EPA framework is comprehensive and applicable. The development process demonstrates methodological rigor and reliability, offering a simple and practical standardized tool for competency-based training and assessment in renal pathology.

Key words: Nephrology, Renal pathologist, Entrustable professional activities, Delphi expert consultation method, Competency-based medical education

中图分类号: