中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 664-669.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20231019-00589

• 教学方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

专题体验式教学方法在基础医学专业生物信息学课程教学中的应用

李淼新, 丁涛   

  1. 中山大学中山医学院遗传与生物医学信息学系,广州 510080
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-19 出版日期:2024-09-01 发布日期:2024-09-03
  • 通讯作者: 李淼新, Email: limiaoxin@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中山大学中山医学院2024年教学质量与教学改革工程类项目(50000-12220011)

Application of thematic experiential teaching in bioinformatics course learning for students majoring in basic medicine

Li Miaoxin, Ding Tao   

  1. Department of Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080
  • Received:2023-10-19 Online:2024-09-01 Published:2024-09-03
  • Contact: Li Miaoxin, Email: limiaoxin@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project of the Zhongshan School of Medicine in 2024, Sun Yat-sen University (50000-12220011)

摘要: 目的 探索并评估专题体验式教学方法在生物信息学课程教学中的应用效果。方法 采用试验对照方法。2022年4月至6月,选取中山大学中山医学院2018级和2019级五年制基础医学专业39名学生为研究对象,其中2019级26名学生为试验组,采用专题体验式教学方法;2018级13名学生为对照组,采用传统教学方法。运用Fisher精确检验、秩和检验等统计分析方法对两组学生的课程教学满意度评价问卷反馈和学习成绩进行评估,其中问卷反馈为匿名填写,共有34人参加。结果 2019级21名学生对课程教学效果评价“出色”的比例为76.2%(16/21),显著高于2018级13名学生的7.7%(1/13);2019级学生认为课程学习“非常有收获”的比例为61.9%(13/21),显著高于2018级学生的15.4%(2/13);2019级学生“非常同意”推荐这门课程的比例为61.9%(13/21),显著高于2018级学生的7.7%(1/13);2019级学生期末考核中位数成绩为87分,高于2018级学生的81分:其差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 在生物信息学课程中采用专题体验式教学方法有助于激发学生的学习兴趣,提升了教学成效和满意度。

关键词: 生物医学研究, 生物信息学, 专题体验式教学, 教学实践, 学习成效

Abstract: Objective To explore and evaluate the effectiveness of the thematic experiential teaching model in a bioinformatics course. Methods An experimental control study was employed. From April to June 2022, 39 students majoring in 5-Year Basic Medicine from the Zhongshan School of Medicine at Sun Yat-sen University, from the classes of 2018 and 2019, were selected as the study subjects. The 26 students from the class of 2019 were assigned to the experimental group, which employed the ″thematic experiential″ teaching model, while the 13 students from the class of 2018 were assigned to the control group, which used traditional teaching methods. Course teaching satisfaction evaluation questionnaires and academic performance of students were used for assessment. The questionnaire was filled out anonymously and voluntarily by 34 participants Statistical analyses were conducted using Fisher's exact test and rank-sum test. Results The proportion of 21 students in the class of 2019 who evaluated the course teaching effect as ″excellent″ was 76.2% (16/21), significantly higher than 7.7% (1/13) observed among the students from the class of 2018. The proportion of 2019 class students who found the course ″very rewarding″ was 61.9% (13/21), significantly higher than the 2018 class students' 15.4% (2/13). The proportion of 2019 class students who ″strongly agreed″ to recommend the course was 61.9% (13/21), significantly higher than the 2018 class students' 7.7% (1/13). The median of final exam scores for the 2019 class students was 87 points, higher than the 2018 class students' 81 points. All differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions Implementing the thematic experiential teaching model in a bioinformatics course helps to stimulate students' interest in learning and enhances teaching effectiveness and satisfaction.

Key words: Biomedical research, Bioinformatics, Thematic experiential teaching mode, Teaching practice, Learning effectiveness

中图分类号: