中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 53-57.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230316-00265

• 住院医师与专科医师规范化培训 • 上一篇    下一篇

全科医学专科医师和指导医师对专科医师规范化培训认识和态度的质性研究

张建欣, 姚弥, 董爱梅, 金雪, 祁祯楠, 荆冠宁, 周国鹏, 迟春花   

  1. 北京大学第一医院全科医学科,北京 100034
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-16 出版日期:2024-01-01 发布日期:2023-12-29
  • 通讯作者: 迟春花, Email: chunhua.chi@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学医学部专科医师培训研究重点招标课题(2020ZP07)

Qualitative research on the perspective and attitude of general practice specialists and their instructors towards specialist training

Zhang Jianxin, Yao Mi, Dong Aimei, Jin Xue, Qi Zhennan, Jing Guanning, Zhou Guopeng, Chi Chunhua   

  1. Department of General Practice, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2023-03-16 Online:2024-01-01 Published:2023-12-29
  • Contact: Chi Chunhua, Email: chunhua.chi@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Key Bidding Project of Specialist Training Research of Peking University Health Science Center(2020ZP07)

摘要: 目的 探究全科医学专科医师和指导医师对全科医学专科医师规范化培训(简称“全科专培”)的认识和态度,为全科专培的发展提供参考。方法 采用质性研究方法。2022年12月,对北京大学直属附属医院的7名全科医学专科医师和11名指导医师进行半结构访谈,采用主题框架法对访谈资料进行分析。结果 提取出3个主题:全科医学专科医师和指导医师一致认为需更进一步明确全科专培的目标和意义;全科专培方案应个体化;全科专培需采用多学科融合教学方式。结论 目前全科医学专科医师和指导医师一致反映全科专培的目标和意义不够明确,全科专培效果有待提高。建议全科专科医师和指导医师共同协商,结合培训医师的工作需求和职业发展规划,制定个体化的全科专培方案,采取多学科团队融合教学,促进全科专培质量的提升。

关键词: 态度, 全科医学, 专科医师规范化培训, 认识, 质性研究

Abstract: Objective To explore the perspective and attitude ofgeneral practice specialists and their instructors towards specialist training and to inform the development of general practice specialist training. Methods The qualitative research method was adopted. In December 2022, semi-structured interviews were conducted among 7 general specialist trainees and 11 instructors of general practice department from Peking University Health Science Center affiliated teaching hospitals. The interview data were analyzed by thematic framework. Results Three themes were extracted: teachers and students agreed that the purpose and significance of general practice specialist training should be further clarified; training program of general practice specialist training should be personalized; multi-disciplinary integration training should be adopted for general practice specialist training. Conclusions At present, teachers and students generally reflect that the goal of general practice specialist training are not clear, which leads to the unsatisfactory deliverance of process and effect. Therefore, it is suggested that general practice specialist trainees and their instructors should develop an individualized training plan based on the needs of workplace and personal career development, and multi-disciplinary integration training can promote the improvement of the quality of the general practice specialist training.

Key words: Attitude, General practice, Standardized training for specialists, Perspective, Qualitative study

中图分类号: