Comparative analysis of research hotspots in standardized residency training for general practitioners between literature in Chinese and English

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240116-00056

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To conduct a comparative analysis of the research hotspots in the field of standardized residency training of general practitioners in Chinese and English literature, aiming to inform relevant research in China. Methods Searches were conducted for literature related to general practice residency training from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2023, in CNKI, Chinese Medical Journals, and the Web of Science database. The analysis of keyword co-occurrence and clustering was performed using CiteSpace.6.2.R4 package. Results A total of 749 Chinese and 482 English literature was included in this study. From 2004 to 2015, English publications amounted to 222, nearly three times the volume of Chinese publications in the same period. Since 2016, the average annual number of Chinese publications has increased to 71.5, while English publications have remained at only 33 per year. Chinese publications accounted for only 1.9% (9/482) of the English publications, with a centrality of 0. Cluster analysis of high-frequency keywords revealed that English literature focused on the development of residents′ comprehensive abilities, identification and management of mental health, educational practice and effectiveness evaluation, and demand-oriented curriculum design. In contrast, Chinese literature centered on cultivating residents′ post-competency, optimizing training models, strengthening base construction, and evaluating teaching outcomes. Both Chinese and English literature highlighted the importance of improving training quality and residents′ comprehensive abilities. Chinese literature placed greater emphasis on meeting the training needs of residents from diverse backgrounds, whereas English literature prioritize improvement of residency training courses guided by the needs of special populations and current trends in disease prevalence. Conclusions Since 2016, research on standardized residency training of general practitioners in China has gained significant interest, yet its international influence remains to be enhanced. In the future, it is essential to adopt international best practices, foster global exchanges and collaborations, and improve the quality and impact of China′s research in this field.

Key words: Bibliometrics, General practice, Residency training, Research hotspots, Comparative analysis

CLC Number:

Ye Zhuojun, Shen Yanli, Jiang Xiao, Fan Shulei, Feng Zhiying, Meng Chao, Yuan Huiyun. Comparative analysis of research hotspots in standardized residency training for general practitioners between literature in Chinese and English[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2025, 45(1): 66-71.

References

[1] 武宁, 程明羕, 闫丽娜, 等. 中国全科医生培养发展报告(2018)[J].中国全科医学,2018,21(10):1135-1142. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.10.001.
[2] 杨辉, 韩建军, 许岩丽. 中国全科医生队伍建设的发展、挑战与展望[J].中国全科医学,2019,22(19):2267-2279. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.351.
[3] 于晓松. 新中国成立70年以来中国全科医学发展与展望[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(11): 1797-1799. DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001058.
[4] 孟群. 国外全科医学发展与我国全科医学教育面临的问题及思考[J].中国全科医学,2001,4(3):169-171. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2001.03.001.
[5] 赵欣欣, 孙小婷, 潘志刚, 等. 英美中三国全科医生培养模式对比研究[J].中国全科医学,2018,21(22):2660-2663,2667. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.22.003.
[6] 杨人灵, 郭伟, 姜悦, 等. 国内外全科医师规范化培训考核评价现状[J].医学研究杂志,2015,44(6):176-178. DOI: 10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2015.06.051.
[7] 孙雨菁, 任菁菁, 段春翠. 我国全科医学教育研究现况与展望——基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2023,7(2):113-118. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2023.02.001.
[8] 唐瑛, 李新刚, 刘财德, 等. 国内全科医学教育研究的文献计量学分析[J].潍坊医学院学报,2022,44(4):307-311. DOI: 10.16846/j.issn.1004-3101.2022.04.020.
[9] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2015.02.009.
[10] 刘则渊,陈悦,侯海燕,等.科学知识图谱方法与应用[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:110.
[11] 刘凯, 许军, 夏旭. 数据可视化分析软件CiteSpace在自测健康研究中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2016,33(12):1291-1296. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2016.12.024.
[12] Li D. Training doctors for primary care in China: transformation of general practice education[J]. J Family Med Prim Care, 2016,5(1):1-2. DOI: 10.4103/2249-4863.184614.
[13] 许新月, 杜晓莉, 刘斌, 等. 国内外医学教育评估研究热点可视化对比分析[J].现代预防医学,2021,48(14):2685-2688.
[14] 张安, 高立. 西方高等医学教育对我国医学教育教学改革的影响[J].济宁医学院学报,2018,41(1):33-36. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9760.2018.01.009.
[15] 朱晓丹, 李琰华. 叙事医学教学对提升医学生共情能力的有效性研究[J].医学与哲学,2023,44(8):57-59,81. DOI: 10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2023.08.12.
[16] 朱夏媛, 葛彩英, 孔慜, 等. 叙事医学在社区全科住院医师规范化培训中的探索[J].继续医学教育,2023,37(7):21-24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2023.07.006.
[17] 杨禹娟, 姚筱, 白净, 等. 叙事医学融入全科医学教育初探[J].中国医学伦理学,2023,36(11):1216-1219. DOI: 10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2023.11.07.
[18] 王林, 王以新, 陈婷燕, 等. 叙事医学在基层医疗中的实践:基于全科医生视角[J].中国全科医学,2024,27(24):3057-3060. DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0181.
[19] 刘孝美, 古瑶, 唐孟言, 等. 近10年我国叙事医学研究现状的共词分析[J].中国医学伦理学,2023,36(11):1200-1207. DOI: 10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2023.11.05.
[20] Li X, Lu J, Hu S, et al. The primary health-care system in China[J]. The Lancet, 2017,390(10112):2584-2594. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33109-4.