中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 916-920.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.06.026

• 住院医师培训 • 上一篇    下一篇

放射科住院医师规范化培训基于网络学习平台的过程性评价研究

刘颖, 郎宁, 袁慧书   

  1. 100191北京大学第三医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-01 发布日期:2020-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 郎宁, Email: 13501241339@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国学位与研究生教育学会研究课题(B1-20170308-01);中华医学会医学教育分会和中国高等教育学会医学教育专业委员会2016年医学教育研究立项课题(2016B-JJ019)

Research on the value of process evaluation of residents' standardized training in department of radiology based on the network study platform

Liu Ying, Lang Ning, Yuan Huishu   

  1. Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2018-04-01 Published:2020-12-09
  • Contact: Lang Ning, Email: 13501241339@126.com
  • Supported by:
    Chinese Degree and Graduate Education Association(B1-20170308-01); Chinese Medical Association Medical Education Branch and China Association of Higher Education Medical Education Specialized Committee 2016 Medical Education Research Project(2016B-JJ019)

摘要: 目的 通过建立微信学习、影像教学系统和基于放射科信息系统的报告评分及报告反馈系统的网络学习平台,采用基于过程评价的模式,在不同时间节点对规范化培训住院医师(以下简称学员)进行多次评估、反馈,以期提高放射科规范化住院医师培训效果。同时,对学员报告评分、中差报告再学习时间与考核成绩的相关性进行了分析,以探讨学员日常报告的书写情况、审核医师的评分是否可用于评估学员的学习效果。方法 本研究采用实验对照方法。选择北京大学第三医院参加规范化培训的27名学员为研究对象,其中2017年的12名学员为实验组,2016年的15名学员为对照组,两组学员生源组成相似。在放射科培训中,实验组采用网络学习平台教学模式,对照组采用传统教学模式。各组培训结束后分别进行X线和CT出科考试,比较两组学员的成绩差异;比较实验组不同来源学员的成绩差异,分析评分和再学习时间与出科考试成绩、一阶段模拟考试成绩的相关性。结果 X线考试成绩:实验组为(85.7±6.9)分,对照组为(80.0±7.7)分,差异无统计学意义(t=-1.988,P>0.05);CT出科考试成绩:实验组为(86.8±5.7)分,对照组为(81.1±7.5)分,差异具有统计学意义(t=-2.198,P<0.05)。将实验组按学员来源分为两组,比较两组学员的X线出科考试成绩、CT出科考试成绩和一阶段模拟考试成绩,差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。对实验组学员报告评分中差得分比例、审核医师评分、评分中差报告再学习时间与X线、CT出科考试成绩进行相关分析,显示学员的X线、CT出科考试成绩分别与报告评分中差比例及评分中差报告学习时间呈负相关,与审核医师评分呈正相关。出科考试后再学习时间与一阶段模拟考试成绩呈负相关。结论 基于网络学习平台的过程性评价模式提高了规范化住院医师培训的效果和他们掌握专业知识的能力。评分、再学习时间与学员成绩的相关性结果说明,学员日常报告的书写情况、审核医师的评分可用于评估学员的学习效果。同时,可以加强审核医师评分的作用,进一步提高报告医师书写报告的质量。

关键词: 网络化, 微信, 住院医师规范化培训, 过程性评价

Abstract: Objective To improve the effect of standardized residency training in radiology department by establishing WeChat learning platform, image teaching system and RIS-based report scoring and reporting feedback system, and adopting the process-based evaluation model, making multiple assessments at different time points and giving feedback. To explore whether the daily reports writing and doctor's scores can be used to evaluate the learning effect by analyzing the correlation between report score, the relearning time and the examination results. Methods The experimental control method was adopted. Twenty-seven trainees who participated in standardized training in Peking University Third Hospital were selected, including 12 trainees in 2017 as the experimental group and 15 trainees in 2016 as the control group. Two groups of trainees were similar in composition. In training, the experimental group was adopted the network learning platform teaching model, while the control group was adopted the traditional teaching model. After the training, results of X ray and CT were compared between the experimental group and control group. Results of different trainees in the experimental group were compared. Correlations between scores, relearn time and exams, one-stage mock examination were analyzed. Results The average scores of X ray: (85.7±6.9) in the experimental group and (80.0±7.7) in the control group, there was statistically significant difference in X ray scores (t=-1.988, P>0.05). The average scores of CT were (86.8±5.7) in the experimental group and were (81.1±7.5) in the control group, there was statistically significant difference in CT scores (t=-2.198, P<0.05). The experimental group was divided into two groups according to the source of trainees. There were differences of X ray examination, CT examination and one-stage mock examination between two groups (all P<0.05). Correlation analysis was made between the proportion of median score, superior doctor's score, median report relearning time and X ray and CT examination. The scores of X ray and CT examination were negatively correlated to the proportion of median scores, and relearning time, and were positively correlated to the scores of superior doctors. The relearning time after examination was negatively correlated to the results of one-stage mock examination. Conclusions The process evaluation model based on network learning platform improves the effect of standardized resident training and the ability to master professional knowledge. The correlations between scores, relearning time and examination results indicate that the daily report writing and the doctor's scores can be used to evaluate the learning effect. At the same time, the role of rating should be strengthened and the quality of report writing should be improved in the further.

Key words: Networking, WeChat, Residents' standardized training, Process evaluation