中文版社区护理感知量表在职业院校护理学生中应用的信效度检验

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220702-00850

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 236-240.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220702-00850

• 医学教育评估 • 上一篇

中文版社区护理感知量表在职业院校护理学生中应用的信效度检验

吴妍平¹, 王立新², 王云文¹, 封秀娟³, 卢羽彤⁴, 张彦芳⁵, 孙丽丽⁶, 徐仁华⁷

¹滨州医学院附属医院老年医学科,滨州 256603;
²滨州医学院附属医院重症医学科,滨州 256603;
³滨州职业学院健康学院智慧健康养老服务与管理教研室,滨州 256600;
⁴滨州医学院2020级护理学专业硕士研究生,烟台 264003;
⁵滨州医学院2021级护理学专业硕士研究生,烟台 264003;
⁶滨州医学院2022级护理学专业硕士研究生,烟台 264003;
⁷滨州医学院护理学院,烟台 264003

收稿日期:2022-07-02 出版日期:2023-03-01 发布日期:2023-02-24
通讯作者: 徐仁华, Email: xrhazz@163.com
基金资助:
中华医学会医学教育分会和中国高等教育学会医学教育专业委员会2018年医学教育研究立项课题(2018B-N18066);山东省社会科学规划研究项目(21CGLJ01)

Reliability and validity analysis of the Chinese version of the scale on community care perceptions among nursing students at vocational colleges

Wu Yanping¹, Wang Lixin², Wang Yunwen¹, Feng Xiujuan³, Lu Yutong⁴, Zhang Yanfang⁵, Sun Lili⁶, Xu Renhua⁷

¹Department of Geriatrics, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou 256603, China;
²Intensive Care Unit, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou 256603, China;
³Intelligent Health Pension Service and Management Teaching and Research Office, Health College, Binzhou Vocational College, Binzhou 256600, China;
⁴Master Degree Candidate, Nursing Major, Enrolled in 2020, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264003, China;
⁵Master Degree Candidate, Nursing Major, Enrolled in 2021, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264003, China;
⁶Master Degree Candidate, Nursing Major, Enrolled in 2022, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264003, China;
⁷School of Nursing, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264003, China

Received:2022-07-02 Online:2023-03-01 Published:2023-02-24
Contact: Xu Renhua, Email: xrhazz@163.com
Supported by:
Chinese Medical Association Medical Education Branch and China Association of Higher Education Medical Education Specialized Committee 2018 Medical Education Research Project (2018B-N18066); Project of Shandong Provincial Social Science Planning and Management Office (21CGLJ01)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析中文版社区护理感知量表(the scale on community care perceptions,SCOPE)在职业院校护理学生中应用的信效度。方法 2022年3月,在山东省某2所职业院校609名护理学生中采用一般资料调查问卷、中文版SCOPE进行调查,采用内部一致性检验、内容效度指数和因子分析检验分析问卷的信度和效度。结果 SCOPE量表最终保留情感成分量表(10个条目)、实习量表(5个条目)、职业量表(14个条目)和2个非计分独立条目共31个条目。总量表及分量表克朗巴赫系数分别为0.963、0.954、0.894、0.937;内容效度指数为0.903;探索性因子分析,情感成分量表和实习量表各提取1个公因子,职业量表提取2个公因子,3个分量表公因子累积方差贡献率分别为71.373%、70.398%、65.998%。结论中文版社区护理感知量表具有良好的信效度,简单易操作,可用于测评职业院校护理学生对社区护理的感知态度、择业意向及影响因素。

关键词: 学生,护理, 社区护理感知量表, 信度, 效度, 职业院校

Abstract: Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the scale on community care perceptions(SCOPE) among nursing students at vocational colleges. Methods In March 2022, the Chinese version of SCOPE was used to investigate 609 nursing students at 2 vocational colleges in Shandong Province, and the reliability and validity of the scale were analyzed by internal consistency test, content validity index and factor analysis. Results The Chinese version of SCOPE includes a total of 31 items: effective component scale (10 items), placement scale (5 items), profession scale (14 items) and 2 separate items. The Cronbach's α coefficients of the total scale and 3 subscales were 0.963、0.954、0.894 and 0.937 respectively; the content validity index was 0.903; 4 common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, the cumulative variance contribution rate were 71.373%、70.398%、65.998%. Conclusions The Chinese version of SCOPE has good reliability and validity, and it can be used to evaluate the perception attitude of community care among nursing students at vocational colleges.

Key words: Students, nursing, Scale on community care perceptions, Reliability, Validity, Vocational colleges

中图分类号:

R-05

吴妍平, 王立新, 王云文, 封秀娟, 卢羽彤, 张彦芳, 孙丽丽, 徐仁华. 中文版社区护理感知量表在职业院校护理学生中应用的信效度检验[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(3): 236-240.

Wu Yanping, Wang Lixin, Wang Yunwen, Feng Xiujuan, Lu Yutong, Zhang Yanfang, Sun Lili, Xu Renhua. Reliability and validity analysis of the Chinese version of the scale on community care perceptions among nursing students at vocational colleges[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2023, 43(3): 236-240.

参考文献

[1] Deloitte. 2018 Globalhealth care outlook: the evolution of smart health care. (2018)[EB/OL]. [2020-02-24]. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Life-Sciences-Health-Care/gx-lshc-hc-outlook-2018.pdf.
[2] 国家卫生计生委.全国护理事业发展规划(2021-2025年)[Z].国卫医发〔2022〕15号.
[3] 韩凤萍, 潘沙沙, 张东梅, 等. 社区护理人员情绪智力、心理韧性和职业成功感的相关性研究[J].中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(32):4169-4174. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.32.009.
[4] 李青, 胡欣, 付凌敏. 南昌市职业学校护生从事社区护理意向调查研究[J].护理研究,2018,32(2):268-271. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2018.02.027.
[5] 曹健, 张秀军. 安徽省专科护生社区职业选择影响因素的调查研究[J].中华全科医学,2017,15(10):1738-1740. DOI: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.10.030.
[6] van Iersel M, de Vos R, Latour C, et al. The scale on community care perceptions (SCOPE) for nursing students:a development and psychometric validation study[J]. Nurse Educ Pract, 2018,31:61-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.05.002.
[7] 范凤娇, 李小寒. 社区护理感知量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(16):84-87. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.16.084.
[8] Peeters MJ, Harpe SE. Updating conceptions of validity and reliability[J]. Res Social Adm Pharm, 2020,16(8):1127-1130. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.11.017.
[9] 王志燕, 高欢玲, 张红梅, 等. Kihon老年衰弱筛查量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(3):10-13. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.03.010.
[10] Keyworth C, Epton T, Goldthorpe J, et al. Acceptability, reliability, and validity of a brief measure of capabilities, opportunities, and motivations (″COM-B″)[J]. Br J Health Psychol, 2020,25(3):474-501. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12417.
[11] Shultz KS, Whitney DJ, Zickar MJ. Measurement theory in action: case studies and exercises[M]. New York: Routledge, 2013:35-37.
[12] Tuba B, Irem NO, Abdullah B, et al. Validity andreliability of Turkish version of the scale on community care perceptions (SCOPE) for nursing students[J]. Clin Exp Health Sci, 2022, 12: 162-168. DOI: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.897229.
[13] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):152-155. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
[14] Wilmskoetter J, Bonilha H, Hong I, et al. Construct validity of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10)[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2019,41(5):549-559. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1398787.
[15] 王梦佳, 张瑞星, 常明钰, 等. 心理适应量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(1):155-159. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.01.026.

中文版社区护理感知量表在职业院校护理学生中应用的信效度检验

Reliability and validity analysis of the Chinese version of the scale on community care perceptions among nursing students at vocational colleges

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	冯攀, 张泉慧, 罗慧琴. 2016至2020年医师资格考试医学综合考试决策一致性分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(8): 753-756.
[2]	尤美, 徐美虹. 营养与食品卫生学专业核心胜任力评估指标的构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(7): 581-585.
[3]	王玉洁, 张力川, 尹倩, 庞冬, 路潜. 基于WHO框架的护理教师核心胜任力量表的构建与信效度检验[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(10): 938-941.
[4]	郭海臣, 杨茂玲, 高瑞, 李庆林, 张淑娥, 袁嘉, 王燕萍, 李姝荟, 王冠君, 张仲, 杨立斌. 医学生网络学习动机量表的编制与信度和效度分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(10): 942-946.
[5]	李玥, 张丁丁, 佟元任, 魏怡真, 朱惠娟, 刘继海, 罗林枝, 张抒扬. 临床和转化医学研究导师胜任力评价量表的汉化和信效度分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(5): 472-476.
[6]	刘畅, 董越, 张子旬, 胡畅, 彭志勇. 我国医学教育期刊论文中部分问卷调查的质量分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(9): 721-725.
[7]	梁海飞, 潘桂常, 龚剑锋, 丁韦仁, 周海波. 采用概化理论改善临床技能测试设计的研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(8): 641-644.
[8]	张驰, 李欣, 贾金忠, 黄天壬, 刘德平. 医学研究生满意度量表的构建及其信度和效度分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(4): 316-320.
[9]	马俊红, 王景超, 周宇菲, 刘虹. 北京大学医学部学生医师资格考试第二阶段临床综合技能考试成绩分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2019, 39(8): 624-629.
[10]	俞杰, 王佳林, 王明钰, 郭爱敏, 康晓凤. 中文版临床推理与反思自评量表在护理学专业学生中的信效度测试研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2019, 39(7): 539-544.
[11]	宋文文, 师琳, 李鸿鹤, 闻德亮. 美国宾州大学医师职业精神量表的引进及其效度和信度的评价研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2019, 39(11): 868-871.
[12]	刘嘉祯, 陆耀红, 邹扬, 王洪, 王道珍, 李萍. 头戴式记录仪在临床操作技能评价中的信度研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2017, 37(6): 952-955.