临床医学专业学生感知教育质量及与专业满意度关系的分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210816-01022

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 390-394.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210816-01022

临床医学专业学生感知教育质量及与专业满意度关系的分析

陈畑至¹, 由由²

¹北京大学公共卫生学院2018级公共卫生硕士专业学位研究生 100191;
²北京大学医学教育研究所全国医学教育发展中心 100191

收稿日期:2021-08-16 出版日期:2022-05-01 发布日期:2022-04-28
通讯作者: 由由, Email: youyou@bjmu.edu.cn
基金资助:
2019年度北京大学医学部教育教学研究课题[(2019)YB01];2018年度北京大学医学部引进人才项目(BMU2018YJ006)

Analysis of the relationship between education quality and major satisfaction based on clinical medical students' perception

Chen Tianzhi¹, You You²

¹Master Dgree Candidate, Master of Public Health, Enrolled in 2018, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China;
²Institution of Medical Education & National Center for Health Profession Education Development, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China

Received:2021-08-16 Online:2022-05-01 Published:2022-04-28
Contact: You you, Email: youyou@bjmu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Education Research Project of Peking University Health Science Center in 2019[(2019)YB01];Talent Introduction Project of Peking University Health Science Center in 2018(BMU2018YJ006)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的从临床医学专业学生视角分析X大学本科临床医学教育可能存在的不足,为其提升本科临床医学教育质量及临床医学生专业满意度提供参考。方法 2019年6月,采用问卷调查方法对X大学2014级临床医学专业181名学生(以下简称医学生)专业教育的感知教育质量(以下简称为感知质量)与满意度进行分析。利用因子分析将感知质量包含的具体指标降维得到公因子,并计算相应的因子评分。将各公因子分别命名为“临床阶段课程、教师与实习”“临床阶段考核与医院氛围”“临床前阶段课程”“临床前阶段教师”“临床前阶段考核”“基于问题学习(problem-based learning,PBL)”,此即为感知质量的6个维度。采用均数描述学生专业满意度及其对感知质量总体与各维度评价的现状,并基于均数对感知质量各维度进行降序排序;利用多重线性回归分析感知质量各维度对专业满意度的影响,并基于标准回归系数对感知教育质量各维度进行降序排序。结果医学生专业满意度评分为3.56分,感知质量整体评分为3.65分,感知质量各维度评分最高的为“临床阶段课程、教师与实习”(3.89分),最低的为“临床前阶段课程”(3.24分)。回归分析显示,R²值为0.528,感知教育质量各维度对专业满意度均存在正向影响,差异均具有统计学意义(均P <0.05),其中,标准回归系数最高的为“临床前阶段课程”(0.438)。结论 X大学医学生对临床阶段教育质量的评价优于临床前阶段,其中,“临床前阶段课程”的评价最低。然而,临床前阶段感知质量对专业满意度的影响力大于临床阶段,其中,首位影响因素是“临床前阶段课程”。X大学应当切实关注学生需求,听取学生的意见,重点关注临床前阶段课程质量的提升,例如在PBL教学、科研训练、课程整合等方面采取改进措施。

关键词: 临床医学专业学生, 临床医学教育, 感知质量, 专业满意度

Abstract: Objective To analyzes the possible shortcomings of undergraduate clinical medical education in X university from the perspective of clinical medical students, so as to provide reference for improving the quality of undergraduate clinical medical education and the major satisfaction of clinical medical students. Methods In June 2019, a questionnaire survey was used to analyze the perceived quality and satisfaction of 181 students majoring in clinical medicine in 2014 of X university. Factor analysis is used to reduce the dimension of specific indicators included in perceived quality to obtain common factors, and the corresponding factor scores are calculated. The common factors are named “clinical stage courses, teachers and practice”, “clinical stage assessment and hospital atmosphere”, “pre-clinical stage courses,”, “pre-clinical stage teachers”, “pre-clinical stage assessment” and “problem-based learning (PBL)”, which are the six dimensions of perceived quality. The mean is used to describe the current situation of students' major satisfaction and its evaluation of the overall and various dimensions of perceived quality, and the dimensions of perceived quality are ranked in descending order based on the mean; Multiple linear regression is used to analyze the impact of each dimension of perceived quality on major satisfaction, and the dimensions of perceived education quality are ranked in descending order based on the standard regression coefficient. Results The major satisfaction score of medical students is 3.56, and the overall score of perceived quality is 3.65. The highest score of each dimension of perceived quality is “clinical stage courses, teachers and practice” (3.89), and the lowest is “pre-clinical stage courses” (3.24). Regression analysis showed that R² was 0.528, and all dimensions of perceived education quality had a statistically significant positive impact on major satisfaction (all P<0.05). Among them, the “pre-clinical courses” (0.438) had the highest standard regression coefficient. Conclusions Clinical medical students of X university evaluated the quality of education in clinical stage better than that in pre-clinical stage, and “pre-clinical stage courses” had the lowest evaluation. Regression analysis showed that the influence of perceived quality of education on student satisfaction in pre-clinical stage was greater than that in clinical stage, and the first influencing factor was “pre-clinical stage courses”. X university should pay attention to the needs of students, listen to their opinions, focus on the improvement of the quality of pre-clinical courses, and take improvement measures in PBL teaching, scientific research training and curriculum integration.

Key words: Clinical medicine undergraduates, Clinical medicine education, Perceived quality, Major satisfaction

中图分类号:

R-05

陈畑至, 由由. 临床医学专业学生感知教育质量及与专业满意度关系的分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(5): 390-394.

Chen Tianzhi, You You. Analysis of the relationship between education quality and major satisfaction based on clinical medical students' perception[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2022, 42(5): 390-394.

参考文献

[1] 贺建清.高等教育服务与学生满意度研究[J].文教资料,2017(23):129-130.
[2] 杨立军, 张小青. 我国大学生满意度研究现状[J].大学(研究版),2016(10):44-53.
[3] 朱从书.高校学生满意度与专业满意度研究[J].读与写(教育教学刊),2019,16(3):35-36.
[4] 温利香. 应用心理学专业学生对专业培养的满意度现状研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2014.
[5] 李红玫. 辽宁省普通高等院校学生专业满意度研究[D].沈阳:沈阳师范大学,2011.
[6] Hernon P, Nitecki D A. Service quality:a concept not fully explored[J]. Library Trends, 2001,49(4):687-778.
[7] Brady M K,Cronin J. Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality:a hierarchical approach[J]. Journal of Marketing,2001,65(3):34-49.
[8] 王雁.普通心理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2002:15-18,31.
[9] 陈传林. 高等医学院校办学必须遵循医学教育规律[J].西北医学教育,2005,13(5):484-486. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2769.2005.05.013.
[10] 徐立, 张态, 黄和飞, 等. 基于学生满意度评价的专业质量调查与分析[J]. 大理大学学报, 2017,2(3):102-107.
[11] 张义, 刘娜, 张晶, 等. 某地方高校五年制口腔医学生专业满意度调查[J].教育教学论坛,2019(43):58-61.
[12] 蔡娜. 基于学生满意度的医学生教育教学质量的调查分析与思考[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2018,5:204-205. DOI:10.3877/j.issn.2095-8242.2018.A0.141.
[13] 邓均,王聪,孙天鹏.免费医学生的专业认同与专业满意度研究—以贵州医科大学为例[J].社会科学前沿,2020,9(3):305-311.
[14] 本科教学质量现状调查课题组, 陈敏, 房保俊, 等. 工科本科教学质量现状调查报告——三校学生满意度调查[J].高等工程教育研究,2009,(06):71-81,112.
[15] 杨兴益, 董瑞生, 张进荣, 等. 五年制临床医学专业《医学影像学》课程优化整合的教学研究[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2020,7(14):2-3.
[16] 赵炜明, 张晓杰, 云长海, 等. 医学教育全球标准中的学生考核新理念探析 ——以美国名校为例[J].医学与哲学,2020,41(8):56-59. DOI:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2020.08.13.
[17] 柴晓东.高校学生考核方式的现状与改革策略[J].长江工程职业技术学院学报,2016,33(4):29-32.
[18] 王跃群. 形成性评价在护理技能教学中的应用[J].解放军护理杂志,2009,26(9):70-71. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2009.09.033.
[19] 王庆华.形成性评价在护理管理学教学中的应用[J].护理学杂志, 2011,26(14):77-78.

临床医学专业学生感知教育质量及与专业满意度关系的分析

Analysis of the relationship between education quality and major satisfaction based on clinical medical students' perception

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵肖奕, 舒璇, 陈铮威, 陈丽霞. 互动式案例教学在八年制临床医学专业康复医学课后学习中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(9): 814-817.
[2]	陈畑至, 由由, 许诗瑶, 王志锋. 临床医学专业学生对其本科教育重要性和满意度评价的矩阵分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(6): 558-562.
[3]	张进, 杨立斌, 张淑娥, 赵晨曦, 曹德品. 形成性评价在本科临床医学教育中的实施现状与提升策略[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(4): 372-375.
[4]	侯建林, 王韵, 蒲丹, 张燕, 王颖, 崔爽, 郭立, 柯杨. 新形势下对我国临床医学教育的反思[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(3): 197-200.
[5]	卢晓宇, 李庆林, 张淑娥, 王丽华. 临床医学专业学生的成就目标定向对其学业拖延和学习成绩的影响研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(12): 1105-1109.
[6]	张进, 杨立斌, 郭庆峰, 曹德品. 形成性评价在本科临床医学教育中的应用研究综述[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(9): 731-735.
[7]	李鸿鹤, David A Hirsh, Tara A Singh, Yamini Saravanan, Rachel Hathaway, Bianca Shagrin, Elizabeth Gaufberg, Arundhati Ghosh, 刘君, 李扬龄, 闻德亮. 发达国家纵向整合临床实习模式的发展及其对我国医学教育的启示[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(9): 748-698.
[8]	张春妤, 王妍, 梁华茂. 北京大学第三医院八年制临床医学专业学生妇产科临床见习现状调查[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2019, 39(3): 189-192.
[9]	邢长英, 李萍, 艾志宏, 陶敏芳. 模拟人在产科学实习教学中的应用探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2018, 38(2): 261-264.
[10]	齐心. 临床医学教育过程性评价与结果性评价的比较[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2018, 38(2): 304-307.