北京大学第三医院学位论文质量保障体系建设

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210301-00263

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 学位论文质量保障是研究生培养工作的重要环节,而学位论文的核心价值在于对原创知识的贡献。自2018年起,北京大学第三医院基于全面质量管理理念,积极实施全员参与、全过程管理、全面质量管理和信息化智慧管理,逐步建立了研究生学位论文质量保障体系,在提高论文质量、尤其是在保障论文学术道德规范层面取得了良好的效果,2016年至2020年学位论文查重率大体呈下降趋势。建立科学化的研究生教学管理体系,充分调动全员参与全过程,形成严谨、创新的学术氛围,保障并不断提高学位论文质量,才能够培养合格的医学拔尖创新人才。

关键词: 学位论文, 原创性, 全面质量管理, 质量保障体系, 论文查重, 研究生培养

Abstract: The quality assurance of dissertations is an important part of graduate training, and the core value of dissertations lies in the contribution to innovative knowledge. Since 2018, based on the concept of total quality management, Peking University Third Hospital has actively implemented full participation, process-spanning management, all-sided quality management, IT-based smart management and gradually established a quality assurance system for dissertations. The project has achieved good results in improving the quality of dissertations, especially in ensuring the academic ethics of dissertations. From 2016 to 2020, the duplication rate of dissertations generally showed a downward trend. Establishing scientific culturing system, fully mobilizing all staff to participate in the whole process, forming a rigorous and innovative academic atmosphere, and continuously improving the quality of dissertations are very important to cultivate qualified innovative medical talents.

Key words: Dissertation, Originality, Total quality management, Quality assurance system, Dissertation rechecking, Postgraduate training

中图分类号:

R-05

袁文青, 张爱京, 霍刚, 谷士贤. 北京大学第三医院学位论文质量保障体系建设[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(12): 1126-1130.

Yuan Wenqing, Zhang Aijing, Huo Gang,Gu Shixian. Development of dissertation quality assurance system in the Peking University Third Hospital[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2021, 41(12): 1126-1130.

参考文献

[1] 岳英. 重识博士论文的价值危机:知识、技术与权力[J].北京大学教育评论,2018,16(1):2-14,186.
[2]高耀. 学科文化与博士学位论文的创新标准——基于哲学、社会学和物理学的考察[J].北京大学教育评论,2018,16(1):15-38,187.
[3]国务院办公厅印发《关于加快医学教育创新发展的指导意见》[J].中华医学信息导报,2020,35(18):2. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-8039.2020.18.101.
[4] 蒋传海. 推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设[J]. 理论视野, 2015(12):37-39.
[5]吴凡, 汪玲. “双一流”建设背景下医学研究生教育改革的思路与实践[J].中国卫生资源,2019,22(6):399-404. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-953X.2019.06.001.
[6]王凤清, 律颖, 王青. 医学学术型博士学位论文评价体系的构建[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2017,16(8):772-776. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2017.08.004.
[7]许丹东, 吕林海. 知识生产模式视角下的博士学位论文评价理念及标准初探[J].学位与研究生教育,2017(2):48-53. DOI:10.16750/j.adge.2017.02.011.
[8] Ghadirian L, Sayarifard A, Majdzadeh R, et al. Challenges for Better thesis supervision[J]. Med J Islam Repub Iran, 2014,28:32.
[9] Frei E, Stamm M, Buddeberg-Fischer B. Mentoring programs for medical students-a review of the PubMed literature 2000-2008[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2010,10:32. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-32.
[10]Reynolds JA, Thompson RJ Jr. Want to improve undergraduate thesis writing? Engage students and their faculty readers in scientific peer review[J]. CBE Life Sci Educ, 2011,10(2):209-215. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.10-10-0127.
[11]方坚. 我国学位论文质量控制研究述评[J].现代情报,2008(7):134-136.
[12]Supriyadi S, Kholid MR. Focused written feedback on developing quality bachelor’s thesis proposal[J]. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 2020,5(2):265-274. DOI: 10.24042/tadris.v5i2.5469.
[13]Nieminen P, Sipilä K, Takkinen HM, et al. Medical theses as part of the scientific training in basic medical and dental education: experiences from Finland[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2007,7:51. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-51.
[14]Can E, Richter F, Valchanova R, et al. Supervisors' perspective on medical thesis projects and dropout rates: survey among thesis supervisors at a large German university hospital[J]. BMJ Open, 2016,6(10):e012726. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012726.
[15]娄枝, 张务农, 乔刚. 博士学位论文质量监测评估指标体系研究[J].学位与研究生教育,2020(6):49-54. DOI: 10.16750/j.adge.2020.06.008.
[16]郭海燕, 刘春荣, 张志斌, 等. 博士学位论文评审制度改革及其成效分析[J].中国高等教育,2019(5):28-31.
[17]张鑫, 王科, 李欣. 研究生学位论文双盲评审的实践与思考[J]. 管理观察, 2018(7):88-90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2877.2018.07.035.
[18]洪流. 树立一流目标强化内涵建设推动江苏学位与研究生教育高质量发展[J].学位与研究生教育,2018(5):1-6. DOI: 10.16750/j.adge.2018.05.001.
[19]袁飞, 段昌柱. 临床医学专业学位研究生学位论文质量管理途径研究[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2017,16(12):1193-1198. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2017.12.002.
[20]李晨曦, 崔爽. 学位论文查重视角下加强医学研究生学术规范教育的思考[J].中华医学教育杂志,2020,40(10):800-803. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200225-00188.
[21]谢兆贤, 叶淑祯, 黄沈权. 一种综合性论文查重评估方法[J].计算机应用研究,2019,36(9):2726-2729.
[22]Kumar PKS. Similarity index of doctoral theses submitted to universities in Kerala: an investigation[J]. Library Philosophy and Practice(e-journal), 2019, 2130.
[23]Al-Thwaib E, Hammo BH, Yagi S. An academic Arabic corpus for plagiarism detection: design, construction and experimentation[J]. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2020,17(1):1-26. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0174-x.
[24]李程, 李茜希, 肖梦婷. 六西格玛与质量管理[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2017:7.
[25]Marchiori D, Mendes L. Knowledge management and total quality management: foundations, intellectual structures, insights regarding evolution of the literature[J]. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2020,31(9-10):1135-1169. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2018.1468247.
[26]常晓虹. 论高校全面质量管理[J]. 清华大学教育研究,2002,23(3):85-89. DOI:10.3969/ j.issn.1001-4519.2002.03.014.
[27]高兴亚, 喻荣彬, 李茜. 医学教育信息化的现状与未来[J].高校医学教学研究(电子版),2017,7(1):3-6. DOI: 10.3868/j.issn.2095-1582.2017.01.001.