中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 695-698.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20201009-01437

• 教学方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

研讨式教学方法在我国肿瘤学教学中的应用效果评价

鲁亚杰, 孔胜男, 张红梅   

  1. 空军军医大学西京医院肿瘤科,西安 710032
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-09 发布日期:2021-08-04
  • 通讯作者: 张红梅, Email: zhm@fmmu.edu.cn, 电话: 029-84775412
  • 基金资助:
    2020年陕西省高等教育学会项目(XGH20120);2019年空军军医大学研究生公共课程教改课题(校研[2019]805号)

Evaluation of seminar teaching method in oncology education

Lu Yajie, Kong Shengnan, Zhang Hongmei   

  1. Department of Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China
  • Received:2020-10-09 Published:2021-08-04
  • Contact: Zhang Hongmei, Email: zhm@fmmu.edu.cn, Tel: 0086-29-84775412
  • Supported by:
    Foundation of Shaanxi Institute of Higher Education in 2020 (XGH20120); Graduate Public Course Teaching Reform Project of the Air Force Military Medical University in 2019([2019]805)

PDF (PC)

116

摘要： 目的 系统性评价研讨式(seminar)教学方法在肿瘤学教学中的应用效果。方法 检索中国知网、维普、万方数据库,收集seminar教学方法在肿瘤学教学中应用的对照研究文献,经质量评价后提取文献数据,对seminar教学方法的应用效果指标进行荟萃(meta)分析。结果 最终纳入符合标准的文献7篇。Meta合并结果显示,seminar教学方法在考核总成绩(SMD=1.21,95%CI=0.47~1.96,P<0.01)、理论考核成绩(SMD=0.96,95%CI=0.47~1.45,P＜0.01)和临床能力考核成绩(SMD=1.60,95%CI=1.07~2.14,P＜0.01)方面均优于传统教学方法;seminar教学方法可获得更高的学生满意度(RR=1.35,95%CI=1.16~1.57,P＜0.01);seminar教学方法相比传统教学方法更能激发学生的学习兴趣(RR=1.53,95%CI=1.18~1.98,P<0.01)。结论 seminar教学方法在肿瘤学教学中的应用效果优于传统教学方法。

关键词: 研讨式教学方法, 肿瘤学, 考核成绩, 荟萃分析

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of seminar teaching model in oncology education. Methods The CNKI,VIP and Wanfang databases were searched and the literature about seminar teaching model applied in oncology education was reviewed. After quality evaluation, literature data of learning outcomes of seminar teaching method was collected followed by meta-analysis. Results Seven literatures that met the standard were included. The results of meta-analysis show that: (1)The teaching method of seminar is superior to traditional teaching method in terms of the overall assessment score (SMD=1.21, 95%CI=0.47~1.96, P<0.01), theoretical assessment score (SMD=0.96, 95%CI=0.47~1.45, P<0.01) and clinical skill assessment score (SMD=1.60, 95%CI=1.07~2.14, P<0.01);(2)Seminar teaching method can obtain higher student satisfaction (RR=1.35, 95%CI=1.16~1.57, P<0.01); (3)With the seminar teaching method, students' learning interest can be stimulated more than that of traditional teaching method (RR=1.53, 95%CI=1.18~1.98, P<0.01).Conclusions Seminar teaching method is more effective than traditional one in oncology education.

Key words: Seminar teaching, Oncology, Assessment score, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: