国际医学专业认证有效性研究的现状与思考

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20201217-01722

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 656-660.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20201217-01722

• 国外医学与比较医学教育 • 上一篇下一篇

国际医学专业认证有效性研究的现状与思考

赵悦¹, 吴红斌², 谢阿娜², 王维民³

¹北京大学教育学院2020级医学教育专业硕士研究生 100871;
²北京大学医学教育研究所全国医学教育发展中心 100191;
³北京大学医学部 100191

收稿日期:2020-12-17 出版日期:2021-07-01 发布日期:2021-06-29
通讯作者: 谢阿娜, Email: xieana@bjmu.edu.cn, 电话: 010-82801223
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(71804005)

Current status and reflections on the study of the effectiveness of international accreditation of medical education

Zhao Yue¹, Wu Hongbin², Xie A'na², Wang Weimin³

¹Master Degree Candidate, Medical Education, Enrolled in 2020, School of Education, Peking University 100871, China;
²National Medical Education Development Center & Institute of Medical Education, Peking University 100191, China;
³Peking University Health Science Center 100191, China

Received:2020-12-17 Online:2021-07-01 Published:2021-06-29
Contact: Xie A'na, Email: xieana@bjmu.edu.cn, Tel: 0086-10-82801223
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars (71804005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文旨在梳理国际医学专业认证有效性研究的现状,为国内医学专业认证研究及其认证体系的完善提供依据。以Web of Science核心合集中的期刊文章为研究对象,以1990年1月1日至2020年11月30日为时间范围,根据“认证影响”“有效性”“可持续质量改进”“学业表现”等关键词,筛选出23篇核心文献加以研读。结果表明,认证提升了学生学业表现、院校办学质量,同时承担着提升社会卫生健康水平的责任;仍然存在数据与研究方法局限、结果标准占比较低、区域差异较大等问题。因此建议,创新研究方法、加强标准的元评价、增进区域合作共享信息,以认证的相关研究来不断完善认证制度,促进认证的国际间交流,扩大我国医学专业认证影响力。

关键词: 认证, 医学教育, 研究综述, 有效性

Abstract: To review the current status of the overseas research on the validity of medical accreditation and thus to provide a basis for the improvement of medical accreditation system and concerned research. Reviewing the journal articles in the Web of Science core collection, 23 core articles were selected based on key words such as “Effectiveness”“Impact of Accreditation”“Continuous Quality Improvement”and“Academic Performance” from January 1,1990 to November 30, 2020. On the whole, accreditation improves students' academic performance, the quality of school running, and bears the responsibility of improving social health level. However, there are still some barriers, such as limitation of data and research methods, relatively low standard of results and significant regional differences. Therefore, it is recommended to innovate research methods, strengthen the meta-evaluation of standards, enhance regional cooperation in sharing information, continuously improve the accreditation system with accreditation-related research, promote the international exchange of accreditation, and expand the influence of accreditation of medical education in China.

Key words: Accreditation, Medical education, Research review, Effectiveness

中图分类号:

R-05

赵悦, 吴红斌, 谢阿娜, 王维民. 国际医学专业认证有效性研究的现状与思考[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(7): 656-660.

Zhao Yue, Wu Hongbin, Xie A'na, Wang Weimin. Current status and reflections on the study of the effectiveness of international accreditation of medical education[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2021, 41(7): 656-660.

参考文献

[1] Frank JR, Taber S, van Zanten M, et al. The role of accreditation in 21st century health professions education: report of an International Consensus Group[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2020,20(Suppl 1):305. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02121-5.
[2] 中华人民共和国教育部.教育部临床医学专业认证工作委员会正式通过世界医学教育联合会医学教育认证机构认定[EB/OL].(2020-06-23)[2020-11-19].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202006/t20200623_467763.html.
[3] van Zanten M. The association between medical education accreditation and the examination performance of internationally educated physicians seeking certification in the United States[J]. Perspect Med Educ, 2015,4(3):142-145. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-015-0183-y.
[4] van Zanten M, McKinley D, Durante Montiel I, et al. Medical education accreditation in Mexico and the Philippines: impact on student outcomes[J]. Med Educ, 2012,46(6):586-592. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04212.x.
[5] Tackett S, Boulet JR, van Zanten M. Medical School Accreditation Factors Associated With Certification by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG): a 10-year international study[J]. Acad Med, 2021,DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004047.
[6] Shroyer AL, Lu WH, Chandran L. Drivers of dashboard development (3-d): a curricular continuous quality improvement approach[J]. Acad Med, 2016,91(4):517-521. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001078.
[7] Maccarrick G, Kelly C, Conroy R. Preparing for an institutional self review using the WFME standards - an international medical school case study[J]. Med Teach, 2010,32(5):e227-232. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.482396.
[8] Yousefy A, Changiz T, Yamani N, et al. Developing a holistic accreditation system for medical universities of the Islamic Republic of Iran[J]. East Mediterr Health J, 2009,15(3):747-756.
[9] Blouin D. Accreditation of canadian undergraduate medical education programs: a study of measures of effectiveness[J]. Acad Med, 2020,95(6):931-937. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003065.
[10] Kulasegaram KM, Tonin P, Houston P, et al. Accreditation drives medical education. does evidence drive accreditation?[J]. Med Educ, 2018,52(7):772-773. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13584.
[11] Hays R. The potential impact of the revision of the Basic World Federation Medical Education Standards[J]. Med Teach, 2014,36(6):459-462. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.907881.
[12] Chatterjee P.Trouble at the medical council of India[J].Lancet,2010,375(9727):1679-1679.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60720-9.
[13] Norman G. The birth and death of curricula[J]. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2017,22(4):797-801. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-017-9790-1.
[14] Alrebish SA, Jolly BC, Molloy EK. Accreditation of medical schools in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study[J]. Med Teach, 2017,39(sup1):S1-1S7. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1254746.
[15] Akdemir N, Peterson LN, Campbell CM, et al. Evaluation of continuous quality improvement in accreditation for medical education[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2020,20(Suppl 1):308. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02124-2.
[16] Lindgren S, Karle H. Social accountability of medical education: aspects on global accreditation[J]. Med Teach, 2011,33(8):667-672. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.590246.
[17] Frenk J,Chen L,Bhutta ZA,et al.Health professionals for a new century:transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world[J]. Lancet,2010,376(9756): 1923-1958.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.
[18] Boelen C, Woollard B. Social accountability and accreditation: a new frontier for educational institutions[J]. Med Educ, 2009,43(9):887-894. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03413.x.
[19] Bandiera G, Frank J, Scheele F, et al. Effective accreditation in postgraduate medical education: from process to outcomes and back[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2020,20(Suppl 1):307. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02123-3.
[20] Blouin D, Smith EV. Measuring the continuous quality improvement orientation of medical education programs[J]. Int J Health Care Qual Assur, 2020,ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print)DOI: 10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2019-0102.
[21] Yang EB.Analysis on the performance and tasks of accreditation system for medical colleges[J].J Korean Med Assoc,2008,51(6):586–592.
[22] Bandiera G, Frank J, Scheele F, et al. Effective accreditation in postgraduate medical education: from process to outcomes and back[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2020,20(Suppl 1):307. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02123-3.
[23] Tackett S, Zhang C, Nassery N, et al. Describing the evidence base for accreditation in undergraduate medical education internationally: a scoping review[J]. Acad Med, 2019,94(12):1995-2008. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002857.
[24] van Zanten M, Norcini JJ, Boulet JR, et al. Overview of accreditation of undergraduate medical education programmes worldwide[J]. Med Educ, 2008,42(9):930-937. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03092.x.
[25] Karle H.Global standards and accreditation in medical education:a view from the WFME[J].Acad Med,2006,81(12 Suppl): S43-48. DOI:10.1097/01.ACM.0000243383.71047.c4.

国际医学专业认证有效性研究的现状与思考

Current status and reflections on the study of the effectiveness of international accreditation of medical education

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴敬, 朱亚鑫, 曲波. 现代教育技术在医学教育中的应用与展望[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(5): 390-393.
[2]	王月, 王朝, 汪张毅, 庞晓丽. 严肃游戏在医学教育领域中的应用进展[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(5): 399-402.
[3]	唐菲, 杨漂羽, 王萍, 冯丽. Peyton四步教学法在医学教育中的应用研究进展[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(4): 318-321.
[4]	冯莉莉, 龚晓杰, 宋琳琳, 吴圣, 王逸群, 陈旭岩. 基于置信职业行为构建胜任力导向的急诊住院医师规范化培训课程[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(4): 347-350.
[5]	张进, 杨立斌, 张淑娥, 赵晨曦, 曹德品. 形成性评价在本科临床医学教育中的实施现状与提升策略[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(4): 372-375.
[6]	赵晨曦, 张淑娥, 张进, 李庆林, 田静, 朱丽燕, 曹德品. 美国医学教育体系改革对我国本科临床医学教育的启示[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(4): 381-384.
[7]	侯建林, 王韵, 蒲丹, 张燕, 王颖, 崔爽, 郭立, 柯杨. 新形势下对我国临床医学教育的反思[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(3): 197-200.
[8]	齐心, 金哲, 韩晓宁, 张鸿, 李渊, 董爱梅, 齐建光, 陆叶, 江哲涵, 李岩刘佳帅, 王颖, 李海潮. 住院医师置信职业行为指标的构建研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(2): 104-108.
[9]	李彬, 何子涵, 杨阳, 邓玖鸿, 陈艺尹, 任倩, 郑庆华. 口腔医学专业智慧实验教学的发展现状[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(2): 151-154.
[10]	姜琳, 吕及晟, 张雪君. 多模块数字化影像解剖学课程实践教学和考核平台的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(2): 179-182.
[11]	王娟, 吕立夏, 陈浩宏, 曹金凤, 魏春岚, 杨文卓, 郑加麟. 美国的卫生系统科学教育及其思考[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(2): 183-187.
[12]	闫琦, 戴天, 冯艺, 安海燕. 体验式学习在八年制医学生麻醉学实习教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(1): 58-61.
[13]	费昱达, 王境一, 王瑾, 李旭, 阮侠, 权翔, 谭刚, 黄宇光. 麻醉学教学中引入TeamSTEPPS团队教学课程的探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(1): 62-65.
[14]	张桥. 侯宗濂医学教育思想及其在福建的医学教育实践[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(1): 91-93.
[15]	刘畅, 董越, 张子旬, 胡畅, 彭志勇. 我国医学教育期刊论文中部分问卷调查的质量分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020, 40(9): 721-725.