中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 1140-1143.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210312-00333

• 医学教育评估 • 上一篇    下一篇

口腔医学专业大学四年级专业课程线上教学效果的评价

张舒, 刘杰   

  1. 北京大学口腔医学院教育处 100081
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-12 发布日期:2021-11-29
  • 通讯作者: 刘杰, Email: aiyari@163.com, 电话: 010-82195916

Evaluation of online teaching effect of major courses of senior undergraduates of stomatology major

Zhang Shu, Liu Jie   

  1. Department of Education, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2021-03-12 Published:2021-11-29
  • Contact: Liu Jie, Email: aiyari @163.com, Tel: 0086-10-82195916

摘要: 目的 探究口腔医学专业课程线上教学效果,剖析线上教学存在的问题,为提高线上教学质量提供参考。方法 本研究采用资料分析方法,选取北京大学医学部2015级和2016级口腔医学专业学生大学四年级第二学期的8门专业课程成绩以及2016级学生的学习任务完成情况等资料为研究对象,2016级学生采用基于超星学习通平台的线上教学方式,2015级学生采用传统课堂教学方式。结果 8门课程中,除了6门实践操作较少的课程之外,实践操作较多的口腔修复学和牙周病学课程,2016级学生成绩低于2015级学生成绩[(77.69±11.28)分比(82.02±4.42)分]和[(75.76±10.95)分比(83.17±5.94)分],其差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。2016级学生前四周学习任务的完成率为44.3%(27/61),经过教师反馈督促,到第八周时达到100.0%(61/61)。结论 对于实践操作较多的课程,线上教学效果不如传统线下教学,线上学习教师需要对学生进行及时反馈和督促。

关键词: 口腔医学, 线上教学, 教学效果, 评价

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of online teaching for stomatology and to analyze the existing weakness of online teaching, so as to provide reference for improving quality of online teaching. Methods Data analyze method was applied in this study, and the examination performance of eight major courses in the second semester of senior undergraduates of stomatology major in Peking University Health Science Center enrolled in 2015 and 2016 and the performance of learning by undergraduates enrolled in 2016 were selected as the research objects. Students of enrolled in 2016 adopted online teaching supported by “Chaoxing Xuexitong” Learning Platform, while students of enrolled in 2015 adopted traditional classroom teaching method. Results Among the 8 courses, except for 6 courses with less practical operation, scores of more practical operation courses such as prosthodontics of undergraduates enrolled in 2016 were lower than that of undergraduates enrolled in 2015 [(77.69±11.28) vs. (82.02±4.42)] and periodontology [(75.76±10.95) vs. (83.17±5.94) ], and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05). The completeness of learning process during the first four weeks of undergraduates enrolled in 2016 was 44.3%(27/61), and it reached 100.0%(61/61) in the eighth week after feedback and supervision from teachers. Conclusions The effect of online teaching for stomatology courses based on multiple practical operation was not as good as the traditional offline teaching method, while the effects of stomatology courses learning which need less practical operation do not show significant difference between online and offline teaching.

Key words: Stomatology, Online teaching, Teaching effect;Evaluation

中图分类号: