Chinese Journal of Medical Education ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 66-69.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200310-00298

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of Mini-CEX in case-based clinical probation teaching

Cui Ying1, Bo Hong1, Cao Deping2, Guo Jinsong1, Guo Qingfeng1, Zhu Xiaoli1, Zhang Jin2   

  1. 1Education Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Haerbin 150001, China;
    2Harbin Medical University, Haerbin 150086, China
  • Received:2020-03-10 Online:2021-01-01 Published:2021-01-25
  • Contact: Guo Qingfeng, Email: guoqingfeng2013@163.com, Tel: 0086-451-85552505
  • Supported by:
    Medical Education science research project of Harbin Medical University

Abstract: Objective To explore the application effect of Mini-CEX in clinical probation teaching based on cases. Methods Experimental control method was used in this study. Sixty undergraduates of five-year program enrolled in 2015 in Harbin Medical University who was taking clinical probation from February in 2018 to January in 2019 were selected as the research objects. The students were randomly divided into control group and experimental group distributing with 30 in each. In clinical probation teaching, Mini-CEX evaluation method was used in the experimental group and traditional evaluation method was used in the control group. After the probation, comparing two groups for clinical diagnosis and treatment, and collect the comment from experimental group about students' satisfaction about Mini-CEX evaluation. Results The scores of medical history inquiry of experimental group and control group were (7.77 ± 0.82) and (7.10 ± 1.21), respectively; The physical examination scores were (7.40 ± 0.81) and (6.83 ± 0.99) respectively; The scores of humanistic care were (7.30 ± 1.12) and (6.07 ± 1.89) respectively; The clinical judgment scores were (7.47 ± 0.86) and (6.77 ± 1.48) respectively; The scores of communication skills were (7.77 ± 0.86) and (6.93 ± 1.53) respectively; The scores of organizational effectiveness were (7.20 ± 0.61) and (6.57 ± 1.10) respectively; The overall performance scores were (8.13 ± 0.68) and (7.40 ± 1.19) respectively; The differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). The questionnaire results show that 93.3% (28/30) of the experimental group students are satisfied with the Mini-CEX method. Conclusions The application of Mini-CEX method in clinical probation can improve the quality of student probation.

Key words: Mini-clinical exercise evaluation(Mini-CEX), Clinical probation, Application Medical students

CLC Number: