A study on developing entrustable professional activities for renal pathologists

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250806-00900

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To establish specialty-specific Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for renal pathologists. Methods From 2024 to 2025, preliminary EPA indicators were drafted through literature review. A modified Delphi method was employed, involving two rounds of expert consultation and one consultation meeting with 12 specialists to refine the EPA framework. Results Eleven EPA indicators with content descriptions were developed, alongside expected entrustment levels for different training stages. The expert authority coefficient was 0.89±0.09, with 100.0% response rates across consultations. Kendall′s W coefficients for consensus were 0.448 and 0.510, respectively. Conclusions The established EPA framework is comprehensive and applicable. The development process demonstrates methodological rigor and reliability, offering a simple and practical standardized tool for competency-based training and assessment in renal pathology.

Key words: Nephrology, Renal pathologist, Entrustable professional activities, Delphi expert consultation method, Competency-based medical education

CLC Number:

R-05

Jiang Lei, Liu Gang, Zheng Xizi, Yu Xiaojuan, Ren Yali, Wang Suxia, Qi Xin, Lyu Jicheng, Yang Li. A study on developing entrustable professional activities for renal pathologists[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2026, 46(8): 622-627, DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250806-00900.

References

[1] ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training[J]. Med Educ, 2005,39(12):1176-1177. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02341.x.
[2] Nuts and bolts: entrustable professional activities[J]. Acad Pediatr, 2023,23(7):1307-1308. DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2023.05.018.
[3] 陈心航, 吴红斌, 江哲涵, 等. 国际置信职业行为研究在医学教育中的发展与启示[J]. 中华医学教育杂志,2020,40(12):945-950. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20201012-01447.
[4] Liu L, Jiang Z, Qi X, et al. An update on current EPAs in graduate medical education: a scoping review[J]. Med Educ Online, 2021,26(1):1981198. DOI:10.1080/10872981.2021.1981198.
[5] McCloskey CB, Domen RE, Conran RM, et al. Entrustable professional activities for pathology: recommendations from the College of American Pathologists Graduate Medical Education Committee[J]. Acad Pathol, 2017,4:2374289517714283. DOI:10.1177/2374289517714283.
[6] Pinsk M, Karpinski J, Carlisle E. Introduction of competence by design to Canadian nephrology postgraduate training[J]. Can J Kidney Health Dis, 2018,5:2054358118786972. DOI:10.1177/2054358118786972.
[7] White K, Qualtieri J, Courville EL, et al. Entrustable professional activities in hematopathology pathology fellowship training: consensus design and proposal[J]. Acad Pathol, 2021,8:2374289521990823. DOI:10.1177/2374289521990823.
[8] 李珊, 周文静, 齐心, 等. 置信职业行为在儿科住院医师培训中的实践研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志,2022,42(3):263-267. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210704-00839.
[9] 吕涛, 刘俊, 刘瑛, 等. 基于置信职业行为的妇产科住院医师规范化培训与考核模式的构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志,2022,42(6):550-553. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220310-00294.
[10] 冯莉莉, 陈旭岩, 张向阳, 等. 急诊住院医师置信职业行为指标构建及应用初探[J]. 中国毕业后医学教育, 2021,5(3):197-201. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2021.03.002.
[11] 齐心, 金哲, 韩晓宁, 等. 住院医师置信职业行为指标的构建研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(2):104-108. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20201117-01599.
[12] 金哲, 齐心, 李海潮, 等. 置信职业行为在临床医学教育中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(4):314-320. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.04.018.
[13] 邹万忠. 我国肾活检病理学回顾与展望[J]. 中华病理学杂志,2015,44(7):455-458. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2015.07.005
[14] Naritoku WY, Alexander CB. Pathology milestones[J]. J Grad Med Educ, 2014,6(1 Suppl 1):180-181. DOI:10.4300/JGME-06-01s1-10.
[15] Knollmann-Ritschel B, Huppmann AR, Borowitz MJ, et al. Pathology competencies in medical education and educational cases: update 2023[J]. Acad Pathol, 2023,10(3):100086. DOI:10.1016/j.acpath.2023.100086.
[16] 肾活检病理规范化诊断共识专家组. 肾活检病理规范化诊断的专家共识[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志,2018,34(12):941-946. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-7097.2018.12.013.
[17] Aggarwal A, Bharadwaj S, Corredor G, et al. Artificial intelligence in digital pathology-time for a reality check[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2025,22(4):283-291. DOI:10.1038/s41571-025-00991-6.
[18] Pantanowitz L, Hanna M, Pantanowitz J, et al. Regulatory aspects of artificial intelligence and machine learning[J]. Mod Pathol, 2024,37(12):100609. DOI:10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100609.
[19] Ye Z, Lu Q, Wang J, et al. A quantitative study of pathologists′ perceptions towards artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system[J]. PLOS Digit Health, 2025,4(10):e0001052. DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001052.
[20] Vos S, Hebeda K, Milota M, et al. Making pathologists ready for the new artificial intelligence era: changes in required competencies[J]. Mod Pathol, 2025,38(2):100657. DOI:10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100657.
[21] Xu H, Usuyama N, Bagga J, et al. A whole-slide foundation model for digital pathology from real-world data[J]. Nature, 2024,630(8015):181-188. DOI:10.1038/s41586-024-07441-w.
[22] Vorontsov E, Bozkurt A, Casson A, et al. A foundation model for clinical-grade computational pathology and rare cancers detection[J]. Nat Med, 2024,30(10):2924-2935. DOI:10.1038/s41591-024-03141-0.