TeamSTEPPS联合案例复盘在麻醉危机处理情景模拟教学中的应用

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230210-00119

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 28-32.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230210-00119

TeamSTEPPS联合案例复盘在麻醉危机处理情景模拟教学中的应用

朱冰青, 韩明明, 王松, 康芳

中国科学技术大学附属第一医院麻醉科,合肥 230036

收稿日期:2023-02-10 出版日期:2024-01-01 发布日期:2023-12-29
通讯作者: 康芳, Email: kangfang199771@163.com
基金资助:
安徽省高等学校省级质量工程(2020jyxm2321)

Application of TeamSTEPPS combined with debriefing in simulation teaching of anesthesia crisis management

Zhu Bingqing, Han Mingming, Wang Song, Kang Fang

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230036, China

Received:2023-02-10 Online:2024-01-01 Published:2023-12-29
Contact: Kang Fang, Email: kangfang199771@163.com
Supported by:
Provincial Quality Engineering Project of Anhui Provincial Institution of Higher Education(2020jyxm2321)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨提高医疗质量和患者安全的团队策略与工具包(team strategies and tools to enhance performance and patient safety, TeamSTEPPS)联合案例复盘在麻醉危机处理情景模拟教学中的应用效果。方法 2022年1至12月,选取中国科学技术大学附属第一医院麻醉科40名住院医师为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其平均分为试验组和对照组,试验组20名住院医师采用TeamSTEPPS联合案例复盘教学,对照组20名住院医师采用常规情景模拟教学。教学结束后,对两组住院医师的麻醉危机处理表现分别进行评分;并使用TeamSTEPPS团队合作认知问卷(TeamSTEPPS teamwork perception questionnaire,T-TPQ)和TeamSTEPPS团队合作态度问卷(TeamSTEPPS teamwork attitudes questionnaire,T-TAQ)对两组住院医师评分,同时进行教学满意度调查。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验、t检验和Fisher确切概率法对相关数据进行统计学分析。结果试验组住院医师麻醉危机处理模拟教学测评总分[(80.80±4.79)分]高于对照组住院医师[(72.65±5.54)分],其差异具有统计学意义(t=-4.98,P＜0.001)。试验组住院医师T-TPQ评分和T-TAQ评分分别为162.00(9.50)分和138.00(15.00)分,高于对照组住院医师的150.00(20.25)分和125.50(19.75)分;试验组住院医师对团队合作和学习兴趣感到满意的人数为19人和20人,高于对照组住院医师的13人和15人。其差异均具有统计学意义(均P＜0.05)。结论 TeamSTEPPS联合案例复盘能够提高住院医师在情景模拟教学中的团队合作力和学习兴趣,改善麻醉危机处理的教学效果。

关键词: 麻醉学, 策略, 复盘, 危机干预, 情景模拟教育

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the application of team strategies and tools to enhance performance and patient safety(TeamSTEPPS) combined with debriefing in simulation teaching of anesthesia crisis management. Methods Forty residents in the department of anesthesiology from the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China were randomly divided into experimental group and control group using a random number table. TeamSTEPPS training combined with debriefing for simulation teaching were adopted for the 20 residents in the experimental group, while regular simulation teaching were adopted for the 20 residents in the control group. The performance of residents of the two groups in anesthesia crisis management was scored after the teaching. Then TeamSTEPPS teamwork perception questionnaire(T-TPQ) and TeamSTEPPS teamwork attitudes questionnaire(T-TAQ) were used to rate their perceptions and attitudes towards teamwork of residents, and a teaching satisfaction survey was conducted. Wilcoxon rank sum test,student t test and Fisher's exact probability method were performed to analysis relevant data. Results In the experimental group, the total scores of the residents in the evaluation of anesthesia crisis management simulation teaching were higher than those of the control group[(80.80±4.79) points vs. (72.65±5.54) points], and the difference was statistically significant(t=-4.98,P＜0.001). The T-TPQ scores and T-TAQ scores of residents in the experimental group [162.00(9.50),138.00(15.00)] were higher than those in the control group [150.00(20.25), 125.50 (19.75)], and the differences were statistically significant(all P＜0.05). In the experimental group, the number of residents who are satisfied with teamwork and interest in learning (19 and 20 persons) were higher than those in control group (13 and 15 persons), and the difference were statistically significant (all P＜0.05). Conclusions TeamSTEPPS combined with debriefing can improve the teamwork and learning interest of residents during simulation teaching and therefore enhance the teaching effect of anesthesia crisis management.

Key words: Anesthesiology, Strategies, Debriefing, Crisis interventions, Stimulation education

中图分类号:

朱冰青, 韩明明, 王松, 康芳. TeamSTEPPS联合案例复盘在麻醉危机处理情景模拟教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024, 44(1): 28-32.

Zhu Bingqing, Han Mingming, Wang Song, Kang Fang. Application of TeamSTEPPS combined with debriefing in simulation teaching of anesthesia crisis management[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2024, 44(1): 28-32.

参考文献

[1] 程慧娴, 张恺辰, 鲁美静, 等. SimMan3G 情景模拟教学在麻醉危机处理教学中的应用[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2019,40(14):1797-1800. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2019.03.008.
[2] 费昱达, 王境一, 王瑾, 等. 麻醉学教学中引入TeamSTEPPS团队教学课程的探索[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(1):62-65. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200304-00250.
[3] 赵珍珍, 蒋政宇, 卞金俊, 等. TEAM STEPPS在危重病危机管理教学中的应用[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2019,26(8):762-764. DOI: 10.16770/J.cnki.1008-9985.2019.08.020.
[4] 童斌, 朱滨海, 占伊扬, 等. 医学模拟教学中Debriefing的认识与实践[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2020,4(3):258-261.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2020.03.016.
[5] 龙晓焕,王西富,关天悦,等. 医学模拟教育中复盘教学方法的发展和应用综述[J].中华医学教育杂志,2022,42(3):241-245. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210826-01080.
[6] Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS):development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing[J]. Simul Healthc, 2015,10(2):106-115. DOI:10.1097/ SIH.0000000000000072.
[7] Caitlin MM, Regina DG, Jill HE. Incorporating TeamSTEPPS training to improve staff collaboration in an academic level I emergency and trauma center [J]. Int Emerg Nurs, 2021(55):100959. DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100959.
[8] 宋雪松, 滕士勇, 韩伟, 等. 情景模拟教学联合案例教学法在麻醉科住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2021,5(1):69-72. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2021.01.017.
[9] Qu J, Zhu Y, Cui L, et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire to measure teamwork perceptions of Chinese residents: a cross-sectional study[J]. BMJ Open, 2020,10(11):e039566. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039566.
[10] Hall-Lord ML, Bååth C, Ballangrud R, et al. The Swedish version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork attitudes questionnaire (T-TAQ): a validation study[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2021,21(1):105-112. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06111-1.
[11] 叶雪晨, 朱亚鑫, 赖雁妮, 等. 团队合作态度问卷和团队合作认知问卷的跨文化调适研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2018,38(6):801-805. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.06.001.
[12] Lee A, Finstad A, Gawad N, et al. Nontechnical Skills (NTS) in the undergraduate surgical and anesthesiology curricula: are we adequately preparing medical students?[J]. J Surg Educ, 2021,78(2):502-511. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.08.001.
[13] 黄洁, 方育, 谭莹, 等. Seminar教学法结合PTC在麻醉危机管理中的效果分析[J].继续医学教育,2021,35(5):2-4. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2021.05.002.
[14] 赵敏慧,庄薇,厉跃红,等. 基于反思性实践的深度讨论在助产模拟训练中的应用探索[J].中华医学教育杂志,2018,38(3):341-345. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.03.006.

[1]	李春玲, 黄长盛, 郭曲练, 王锷, 李龙艳, 孔富姣, 孙蓓. 临床麻醉学课程思政的设计与实施效果[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(9): 659-662.
[2]	袁文青, 王敏敏, 褚红玲, 何旋, 谷士贤. 临床医学专业本科生早期参与临床科研训练的影响因素与管理策略思考[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(3): 173-176.
[3]	吴枝娟, 张阳. 麻醉学专业本科生麻醉伦理认知和评价的调查与思考[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023, 43(12): 897-901.
[4]	曾因明, 李文志, 郭曲练, 王国林, 姚尚龙, 邓小明. 我国麻醉学教育未来发展的思考[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(8): 673-676.
[5]	王颖, 汤泓, 胡聪, 牟敦兰, 李雪婷, 张香, 戚思华. 麻醉病例信息呈现格式化模板及其软件对病例汇报教学效果的影响[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(8): 732-735.
[6]	张文婕, 赖亚宁, 卿平. 深层学习策略在医学生职业认同与胜任力之间的中介作用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(3): 220-223.
[7]	龙晓焕, 王西富, 关天悦, 伍军华, 李力. 医学模拟教育中复盘教学方法的发展和应用综述[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(3): 241-245.
[8]	黄靖豪, 林献忠, 高友光, 林兰英. 智能移动终端联合矩阵式二维码技术在麻醉学实习教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(3): 250-253.
[9]	孙晓彤, 隽兆东, 张蕊, 孙丽娜. 山东省麻醉医师技能竞赛结果分析与思考[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(2): 185-188.
[10]	阿里木江·司马义, 高琳, 钱晶晶, 左勇, 马雪萍, 徐桂萍. 新疆麻醉科住院医师规范化培训师资培训效果分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(11): 1043-1046.
[11]	梁建芬, 黑子清, 李响. 我国麻醉学专业博士学位论文文献计量学分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(10): 916-919.
[12]	林增茂, 孔昊, 张锋, 李雪, 黄达, 张鸿. 模拟培训在超声引导区域麻醉教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022, 42(1): 55-59.
[13]	舒晖, 吴修铭, 冷言冰, 毛昂, 陈卫中. 以学习效果为导向的在线学习资源评价研究与建设策略[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(9): 854-858.
[14]	卿平, 姚业楠, 闫昱江. 课程公卫:临床医学专业学生公共卫生教育的一种教学策略[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(6): 499-503.
[15]	贺承鹏, 罗蓉, 杜亮. 医学研究生学习和应用医学统计学的策略[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(5): 456-459.

TeamSTEPPS联合案例复盘在麻醉危机处理情景模拟教学中的应用

Application of TeamSTEPPS combined with debriefing in simulation teaching of anesthesia crisis management

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价