中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 407-410.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.03.021

• 研究与探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

医学本科生一般能力测评问卷的编制

张慧, 程化琴, 蔡景一, 陈娟   

  1. 100191 北京大学公共卫生学院2015级卫生事业管理专业硕士研究生(张慧),医学教育研究所(程化琴),医学部教育处(蔡景一),公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理系(陈娟)
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-29 出版日期:2018-06-01 发布日期:2020-12-08
  • 通讯作者: 陈娟,Email:chenjuan@bjmu.edu.cn

The development of medical undergraduates’ general ability evaluation questionnaire

Zhang Hui, Cheng Huaqin, Cai Jingyi, Chen Juan   

  1. Grade 2015,Master Candidate, Health Management Major, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China (Zhang H); Institute of Medical Education, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China (Cheng HQ); Department of Education, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China (Cai JY); Department of Health Policy and Management,School of Public Health, Peking University(Chen J)
  • Received:2018-01-29 Online:2018-06-01 Published:2020-12-08
  • Contact: Chen Juan, Email:chenjuan@bjmu.edu.cn

PDF (PC)

23

摘要： 目的 编制医学本科生一般能力测评问卷,并进行条目分析和信度效度检验,为医学本科生一般能力提供测评工具。方法 采用问卷调查和统计分析方法。第一轮调查483名医学本科生,运用条目分析方法中的离散程度、相关系数、克朗巴赫α系数和区分度进行条目筛选;运用验证性因子分析对既定的因子模型和数据的拟合程度进行分析。第二轮调查482名医学本科生,基于结果评价问卷的信度和效度。结果 医学本科生一般能力测评问卷包括人文关怀能力、人际沟通能力、自主学习能力、团结合作能力、批判性思维能力、信息获取与利用能力6个维度,每个维度包含7项条目,总共42个条目。问卷信度良好,总体克朗巴赫α系数为0.931,6个维度系数均超过0.700;问卷效度指标除了适配度指数为0.889,略低于标准值(0.9)之外,其他指标均超过标准值,提示因子模型拟合程度较好。结论 医学本科生一般能力测评问卷的信度和效度较好,可以作为医学本科生一般能力的测量工具。

关键词: 医学本科生, 一般能力, 测评问卷, 条目分析, 因子分析

Abstract: Objective To develop medical undergraduates’ general ability assessment questionnaire, and analysis items and evaluate the reliability and validity of the questionnaire.Methods Questionnaire and statistical methods were adopted. The first round survey reached 483 undergraduate medical students, and the data was used to screen items, analyzing each item’s degree of dispersion, correlation coefficient, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and the degree of discrimination, and confirmatory factor analysis was adopted to examine data fitness of the established factor model. The second round survey reached 482 undergraduate medical students, and the data was used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the questionnaire.Results Medical undergraduates’ general ability assessment questionnaire contained humanistic care ability, interpersonal skills, independent learning ability, team cooperation ability, critical thinking skills and the ability to access and applications of information, and each dimension contained 7 items for a total of 42 items. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for total scores was 0.931, and six dimensions were all better than 0.700. Except for the Goodness of Fit Index (0.889) was slightly less than the standard value (0.9), the other indicators were better than the standard value, indicating that the factor model fit well.Conclusions The reliability and validity of the medical undergraduates’ general ability assessment questionnaire are all good, which can be used as a tool of measuring the students’ abilities.

Key words: Medical undergraduate, General ability, Assessment questionnaire, Item analysis, Factor analysis