中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 7-9.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.01.002

• 医学教育管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京大学人民医院临床带教教师对教学目标知晓情况的调查研究

廉波, 陈彧, 刘刚, 赵舟   

  1. 100044 北京大学人民医院心脏外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-08 发布日期:2020-12-08
  • 通讯作者: 廉波,Email：lianbo_hero@163.com

The survey of teaching objective recognition for clinical tutors in Peking University People’s Hospital

Lian Bo, Chen Yu, Liu Gang, Zhao Zhou   

  1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2017-06-08 Published:2020-12-08
  • Contact: Lian Bo, Email: lianbo_hero@163.com

PDF (PC)

21

摘要： 目的 了解北京大学人民医院临床带教教师对教学目标的知晓情况。方法 本次研究纳入了2014年在北京大学人民医院从事临床教学工作的教师105人,并将其分为手术组带教教师59人,非手术组带教教师46人。采用面对面或者电话访问的方式,进行教学目标知晓程度的考查和相关问卷调查。使用SPSS 19.0软件进行数据收集和分析。结果 手术组带教教师中教学目标知晓程度得分小于60分的占比37.3% (22/59);非手术组带教教师得分小于60分的占比17.4% (8/46)。手术组和非手术组在教学时间(Z=2.69,P=0.01)、教学人数(Z=2.53,P=0.02)、教学目标评分(F=8.77,P=0.02)上的差异具有统计学意义。相关性研究提示教学目标知晓程度得分与带教教师的带教年限(r=0.46,P<0.001)、职称(r=0.45,P<0.001)、是否对学生进行教学评价(r=0.39, P<0.001)和教师年龄(r=0.47,P<0.001),呈正相关性;与外科带教教师呈负相关,但相关性较弱(r=-0.22,P=0.03);与带教教师的学历无相关性(r=0.15,P=0.13)。结论 临床带教教师的年龄、教学时间、职称、教学评价和外科带教教师,可能是影响教学目标知晓情况的相关因素。

关键词: 教学目标, 临床教师, 知晓

Abstract: Objective This study thought to understand the Peking University People’s Hospital clinical tutors’ recognition of teaching objective. Methods In 2014,105 clinical tutors working in Peking University People’s Hospital were involved in the survey, they were grouped into two cohorts,59 surgeons and 46 physicians. Teaching objective test and questionnaire survey were conducted by face-to-face or telephone interview, and data collection and analysis was made with SPSS 19.0. Results In the group of surgeons,22 (22/59,37.3%) tutors’ teaching objective score was less than 60,and 8/46 (7.4%) in the group of physicians. There was significant difference between the two groups on the dimension of teaching hours (Z=2.69, P=0.01),number of students (Z=2.53,P=0.02) and teaching objective test score (F=8.77, P=0.02). The research also found positive correlation between the teaching objective test score and the tutors’ teaching experience (r=0.46, P<0.001),professional title (r=0.45,P<0.001),teaching evaluation (r=0.39,P<0.001),tutors’ age (r=0.47,P<0.001);A weak negative correlation between the teaching objective test score and surgeon tutors (r=-0.22,P=0.03);And no correlation between the teaching objective test score and the tutors’ academic diplomas (r=0.15,P=0.13). Conclusions The teaching objective test score score may be affected by the tutors’ teaching experience,professional title,teaching evaluation,tutors’ age and surgeon tutors.

Key words: Teaching objective, Clinical teacher, Recognition