美国密歇根大学心血管外科专业人才培养模式及其启示

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20251216-01634

中华医学教育杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 636-640.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20251216-01634

• 国外医学与比较医学教育 • 上一篇

美国密歇根大学心血管外科专业人才培养模式及其启示

范成铭¹, 杨进福¹, 冯虹²

¹中南大学湘雅二医院心血管外科,长沙 410011;
²中南大学湘雅基础医学院,长沙 410013

收稿日期:2025-12-16 发布日期:2026-07-29
通讯作者: 冯虹, Email: 803236@csu.edu.cn
基金资助:
2024年湖南省高校思想政治工作精品项目(24JP012);2023年湖南省卫生健康高层次人才225青年骨干专项计划(R2023017)

Training model for cardiovascular surgeons at the University of Michigan and its implications

Fan Chengming¹, Yang Jinfu¹, Feng Hong²

¹Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China;
²Xiangya School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China

Received:2025-12-16 Published:2026-07-29
Contact: Feng Hong, Email: 803236@csu.edu.cn
Supported by:
The 2024 Hunan Provincial Higher Education Ideological and Political Work Excellent Project [24JP012]; The 2023 Hunan Provincial Health High-Level Talent Scientific Research Project [R2023017]

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近20年来美国兴起的综合心胸外科一体化住院医师项目,以更早定向、一体化培训和专门的科研训练为特征,在保持高强度临床训练的同时,具有稳定的学术产出和人才吸引力,心血管外科住院医师培训一直沿用此项目。密歇根大学是美国历史最为悠久的研究型大学之一,也是实施该项目最有代表性的院校之一。本文采用资料分析和实地考察相结合的方法,从培养目标、培养路径、课程与轮转、教学方法与评价保障、临床胜任力与培养结果评价等方面对密歇根大学心血管外科专业人才培养模式进行阐释。借鉴其成功经验,我国需要结合国家医疗服务需求、现有制度、培养路径、培训供给侧约束等,逐步探寻适宜国情的心血管外科专业人才培训模式。

关键词: 课程, 美国, 心血管外科学, 住院医师, 专科医师, 启示

Abstract: Over the past two decades, the Integrated 6-year Cardiothoracic Surgical Residency Program (I-6) has emerged in the United States as a representative model characterized by early specialization, longitudinal training, and dedicated research development. By combining intensive clinical exposure with structured academic development, the program has maintained strong scholarly productivity and remained an established pathway for cardiovascular surgical residency training. The University of Michigan, one of the oldest research-intensive universities in the United States, is among the representative institutions implementing this model. Using document analysis and field observation, this article examines the cardiovascular surgery training model at the University of Michigan in terms of training objectives, pathway design, curriculum and rotations, teaching methods, assessment and quality assurance, clinical competence, and training outcomes.Its experience suggests that China should develop a context-appropriate training model for cardiovascular surgeons by aligning national healthcare needs, existing institutional frameworks, training pathways, and the constraints of training capacity.

Key words: Curriculum, United States, Cardiovascular surgery, Resident, Fellow, Implications

中图分类号:

范成铭, 杨进福, 冯虹. 美国密歇根大学心血管外科专业人才培养模式及其启示[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(8): 636-640, DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20251216-01634.

Fan Chengming, Yang Jinfu, Feng Hong. Training model for cardiovascular surgeons at the University of Michigan and its implications[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2026, 46(8): 636-640, DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20251216-01634.

参考文献

[1] 刘明波, 何新叶, 杨晓红, 等. 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2023》要点解读[J]. 临床心血管病杂志,2024,40(8):599-616. DOI:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2024.08.002.
[2] 国家心血管系统疾病医疗质量控制中心, 胡盛寿, 郑哲, 等. 2024年中国心血管病医疗质量概述[J]. 中国循环杂志,2025,40(7):625-645. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2025.07.001.
[3] 顾强, 王咏, 李蒙, 等. 心血管外科专科医师规范化培训实施的探讨[J]. 中国继续医学教育,2024,16(4):189-194. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2024.04.040.
[4] 杨丁, 牟巨伟, 高树庚. 胸外专科医师培训体系演进简述[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志,2023,10(3):188-194. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8773.2023.03.10.
[5] Tchantchaleishvili V, Barrus B, Knight PA, et al. Six-year integrated cardiothoracic surgery residency applicants: characteristics, expectations, and concerns[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013,146(4):753-758. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.05.023.
[6] Obafemi OO, Mullis DM, Rogers AB, et al. Characteristics of integrated thoracic surgery residency matriculants: a survey of program directors[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2022,114(3):1035-1042. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.01.030.
[7] Lebastchi AH, Yuh DD. Nationwide survey of US integrated 6-year cardiothoracic surgical residents[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014,148(2):401-407. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.040.
[8] Zhu Y, Goldstone AB, Woo YJ. Integrated thoracic surgery residency: current status and future evolution[J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2019,31(3):345-349. DOI:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.04.002.
[9] Swing SR, Beeson MS, Carraccio C, et al. Educational milestone development in the first 7 specialties to enter the next accreditation system[J]. J Grad Med Educ, 2013,5(1):98-106. DOI:10.4300/JGME-05-01-33.
[10] Fann JI, Calhoon JH, Carpenter AJ, et al. Simulation in coronary artery anastomosis early in cardiothoracic surgical residency training: the Boot Camp experience[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010,139(5):1275-1281. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.045.
[11] Feins RH, Burkhart HM, Conte JV, et al. Simulation-based training in cardiac surgery[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017,103(1):312-321. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.062.
[12] Ribeiro IB, Ngu J, Lam BK, et al. Simulation-based skill training for trainees in cardiac surgery: a systematic review[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2018,105(3):972-982. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.11.036.
[13] Ikonomidis JS, Menasché P, Kreisel D, et al. Attrition of the cardiothoracic surgeon-scientist: definition of the problem and remedial strategies[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2019,158(2):504-508. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.057.
[14] Wang H, Bajaj SS, Williams KM, et al. Early engagement in cardiothoracic surgery research enhances future academic productivity[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2021,112(5):1664-1671. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.10.013.
[15] Paneitz DC, Wolfe SB, Blitzer D, et al. Early career experiences of cardiothoracic surgery graduates by training model: a national survey[J]. Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep, 2023,1(2):358-361. DOI:10.1016/j.atssr.2023.03.004.

美国密歇根大学心血管外科专业人才培养模式及其启示

Training model for cardiovascular surgeons at the University of Michigan and its implications

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李薇, 马思原, 惠佳亮, 闫麦冬, 梁曦月, 周游, 万丽雅, 袁翌铭, 孙谢栩, 胡振富. 整合数智化资源的来华留学生临床技能学课程构建与实践[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(8): 573-578.
[2]	朱雪梅, 许春娇, 岳阳, 杜欣, 崔岩, 耿扬. 护理教师对器官系统整合课程态度和影响因素与应对策略分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(8): 579-587.
[3]	赵致慷, 黄丽, 李克, 杨宇霞, 王正斌, 王蕾. 我国急诊科住院医师规范化培训教学动态和研究热点的文献计量学分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(8): 604-609.
[4]	蔡剑飞, 孙秦陇, 鲍华芳, 汪玲. 结构化病史采集工具在住院医师风湿类疾病病史采集教学实践中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(8): 610-614.
[5]	蒋镭, 刘刚, 郑茜子, 喻小娟, 任雅丽, 王素霞, 齐心, 吕继成, 杨莉. 肾脏病理专科医师置信职业行为指标的构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(8): 622-627.
[6]	汪成合, 顾倩, 陈露, 李璎霖, 何竑超, 黄芳, 徐丹枫. 外科住院医师规范化培训智能体辅助膀胱镜检查培训课程的设计与实践[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(7): 534-538.
[7]	邓琳子, 刘尚昕, 李宏宇, 沈姞, 奚桓. 住培师资老年医学培训课程大纲构建[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(7): 539-543.
[8]	苏娅, 刘丰韬, 施余露, 黄虑, 董强, 陈嬿, 程忻. 英国住院医师教学能力培养模式及其启示[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(7): 554-557.
[9]	李天龙, 刘露, 苏思慧, 潘纯, 黄晓波. 目标导向的进阶式教学在住院医师重症医学营养支持培训中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(6): 457-463.
[10]	李冬凉, 董璐, 李萍萍. 基于住培学员视角的儿科住院医师儿童青少年精神病学培训现状与需求研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(6): 464-470.
[11]	方琳涵, 程淇, 宁佩珊, 胡国清. 国内外综合性大学医学数据科学课程开设情况的比较研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(6): 476-480.
[12]	王倩, 殷玲, 于洋, 于泳浩, 谢克亮, 李清. 两种情景模拟在麻醉临床前高级心脏生命支持培训的效果对比[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(5): 337-342.
[13]	潘存雪, 郑俊炯, 吴庆, 何涛, 王雪梅, 布艾吉尔·阿布都瓦依提, 李庆荣, 肖非, 林天歆. 全科住院医师规范化培训地域、院间差异及协同路径的质性研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(5): 343-350.
[14]	许方泳, 张单单, 张迎盈, 黄约诺, 潘素素, 张济周. 中医住院医师规范化培训教师教学工作偏好研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(5): 351-357.
[15]	高小卓, 朱延美, 张勇. 全视野数字切片联合基于案例学习教学在临床病理科住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026, 46(5): 358-362.